Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Morality, Suicide and Euthanasia
There are always important questions to be asked -- and answered -- when a child is very ill and healthcare decisions have to be made by the family. In the case of 11-year-old Jimmy, who suffers from an incurable neurological disease in addition to the deadly cancer known as lymphoma, this paper uses helpful, scholarly information from the literature to point out how the parents should respond to Jimmy's health problems and to his decision not to have the chemotherapy. Jimmy is very religious and says he wants to "go to God" but he is not in a position to make that decision independent of his parents.
Should minors be permitted to participate in decisions of the magnitude that Jimmy and his family are faced with? The answer is yes, of course in this case Jimmy should be involved and have his say. His parents will listen to him and it's his right to have input. However, at the age of 11 he will not be making the decision in this case, and it's only right that the decision is not left up to him. It is well-known in Western society that parents have the "…responsibility and authority to make medical decisions on behalf...
Diekema, professor in the University of Washington's Department of Bioethics and Humanities. The parents of an 11-year-old child know him best, care most about him, and providing that they are mentally and socially stable, they have the social and moral responsibility to make the best decisions for him.
"Furthermore," Diekema adds, "since many medical decisions will also affect the child's family, parents can factor family issues and values into medical decisions about their children" (Diekema, 1998, p. 2).
Meanwhile professor Raymond Devettere (who teaches healthcare ethics at Boston College) writes in his book (Practical Decision Making in Health Care Ethics: Cases and Concepts) that "…most children younger than twelve years of age" are not fully developed intellectually to be given "decision-making" authority vis-a-vis their own healthcare (Devettere, 2009, p. 106). In the case of children under 12, their illnesses may very well "…retard mental and moral development," Devettere explains.
Whose decision (parents or child) should be the decisive one? The answer is the parents…
Works Cited
Devettere, Raymond J. (2009). Practical Decision Making in Health Care Ethics: Cases and Concepts. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Diekema, Douglas S. (1998). Ethics in Medicine: Parental Decision Making. University of Washington / Department of Bioethics and Humanities. Retrieved July 10, 2012, from http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/parent.html.
McPherson, Amy. (2010). "Involving Children: Why it Matters," in Listening to Children and Young People in Healthcare Consultations, S. Redsell and A. Hastings, Eds. London, UK:
Radcliffe Publishing.
Active Euthanasia With Parental Consent Active Euthanasia This case provides an example of a situation in which active euthanasia was conducted with the consent of parents. There are three agents in this case among these three; the most important is the patient. The patient was a small girl named Andrea and her age was only nineteen years. Apart from her, the other two important agents in the case were the parents of
Moral Permissibility of Euthanasia Voluntary Active Euthanasia Voluntary Active Euthanasia can be described as a perfectly competent patient's appeal and request to be aided in the process of dying. This act is completely voluntary and by the choice of the patient himself due to the medical condition that he or she might be facing. It is a simplistic appeal on part of the patient to be provided with the necessary ways or
E. The exceptions made for impairment and age would open a Pandora's Box of legal precedence. The Death with Dignity Act and any other forthcoming active euthanasia laws will likely continue to follow the same line of reasoning, i.e. that it is the unimpaired individual who must shoulder the full responsibility of the decisions he or she is making regarding the end of his or her life. That is in
Medical Ethics Assisted Suicide & Euthanasia The dilemma in the case of John H. is the disagreement between the two specialists handling his case. Because of John's immediate condition (internal bleeding), the doctors disagree as to whether they should obey John's wishes from earlier or whether they should follow his immediate request for assistance. Perhaps the real dilemma is John's lack of specificity regarding his wishes. In the case that his condition
Physician-Assisted Suicide, And Active Euthanasia In Favor of the Moral Permissibility of Active Physician-Assisted Suicide According to Mappes and DeGrazia, Brock's support for voluntary active euthanasia is largely based on two ethical values that he regards fundamental (402). The values in this case include the well-being of an individual and individual autonomy or self-determination. Self-determination according to Brock has got to do with letting individuals chart their own destiny, that is, allowing
Ethical Issues of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia The ethical issues relating to assisted suicide and euthanasia have captured the attention of the public. The topic of Euthanasia is a contentious one and it inescapably incites strong emotional argument and gives rise to tough beliefs that do not straight away lend themselves to consensual harmony. It is improbable that a decision can be reached which will meet with universal support whenever such