Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Nature vs. Nurture
An Age Old Debate
Nature vs. nurture is one of the age old debates primarily within psychology but also within other social sciences such as sociology. Intelligence is often one of the aspects in which the argument hinges upon. There has been some evidence that the first born child in any family is more likely to possess traits consistent with intelligence and aptitude. This would suggest that nurture is a key component in the equation since siblings have relatively similar genetic composition. A strong correlation between being the first born and such measurable personality traits as intelligence would indicate that the manner in which one is raised in regards to their status may influence personal development.
However at the same time it is hard to dispute the role that nature plays. Examples will be provided about cases involving eye sight and depth perception in which the biological capabilities that help to shape one's perception of the world are fairly easily identifiable. Therefore it is reasonable to argue that each plays some role in development and the extent of which nature or nurture influences various characteristics is the factor that must be determined. Yet there is one other possibility that has emerged in a relatively new field of psychology known as epigenetics. The epigenetics argument...
This paper will give a brief look into some of the arguments that surround each perspective that fueled the age old debate.
First Born Intelligence -- Nurture Argument
The environment in which you are raised undoubtedly plays a very significant role in your development; this is evident through mere intuition. However, intuition doesn't carry much weight in science and such claims must uphold there weight on their own merit through research. One argument that was proposed state that environments have greater intellectual stimuli will produce personalities of a higher intelligence. Therefore when a child represents the first born in the family they have access to both of their parent's intellectual resources. However, when the child is the second born they must share their parents with their sibling and as consequence experience slightly less intellectual stimulation. Therefore one would expect to find that the earlier you rank in birth order then the more likely you are to possess a higher intelligence than your siblings. Various experiments have support this argument with substantial evidence the most famous of…
Works Cited
Gibson, E., & Walk, R. (1960). Watch Out for the Visual Cliff. Scientific America, 67-71.
Hergenhahn, B., & Olson, M. (2011). An introduction to theories of personality. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Powledge, T. (2011). Behavioral Epigenetics: How Nurture Shapes Nature. BioScience, 588-592.
Zajonc, R., & Markus, G. (1975). Born First, Born Smarter? Psychological Review, 74-88.
Nature-Nurture and Language Development The development of language in an individual is considered as an antecedent from the cognitive ability that is found to be enacted from the genetic structure which helps in the retention and effective utilization of language in the early stages of life. However, the external stimuli with respect to culture and environment also play an effective role in the language development. Moreover, the application of language development
In this Nature vs. Nurture essay example, we will offer topics, titles, an outline, and what it takes to make a great paper. We begin with a strong introduction and thesis statement, followed by body paragraphs that offer in depth analysis of the topics as well as current evidence. We end the essay with a succinct recap of everything under the conclusion section. In critical essays, the main thing to
Nature vs. Nurture Upon researching the issue of nature vs. nurture both elements direct influence upon human development, it is clear that there is no definite way to argue if one plays a greater or not. Upon further understanding it is only fair to propose that both play a significant role in human development and shaping his or her character. At this point in discovery, it is only safe to comment
That is simply because individual in the same family are much more likely than unrelated individuals to share similar foundational experiences by virtue of their exposure to similar parenting and resources in their immediate environment throughout their early lives (Gerrig & Zimbardo, 2007; Rutter, 2006). Just as Rhesus monkeys tend to adopt maternal behaviors and elements of personalities of their mothers irrespective of their genetic inclinations, so do human infants
So, we see that women are committing to their partners even if they are older than their male companions, even if they rarely get married to them, they enter and stay in a stabile relationship. We have every reason to believe that women are in it mainly for the psychological comfort. But what about the men? Young men can date women of any age, given the fact that youth
Age and Love Passionate relationships are one of the most profound aspects of human social and individual development. Passionate intimate relationships are the next developmental stage after the childhood learning done in a family. It is through our passionate and intimate relationships that individuals learn the life lessons of becoming an adult. Some argue that young people do not have the capacity or reasoning skills to have passionate intimate relationships because