No Child Left Behind -- Research Paper

Growth models are more reliable in NCLB research because: a) status models depend on data that is "vertically scaled" (measuring from one grade to the next); b) status models can be linked to "individual students or schools over time"; and c) status models sometimes employ "hierarchical linear modeling" -- a more sophisticated and potentially esoteric technique (Azin, p. 74). Meanwhile, growth models are more effective in evaluating the success of students and schools under NCLB because they take into account "gain scores" (which are calculated by examining the difference from the starting point to the end point) (Azin, p. 74). Further, the multilevel growth model for evaluation measures both student growth and group-level growth, offering researchers and educators an opportunity to factor in teaching quality and school quality.

Conclusion:...

...

But those researchers and other scholars and educators generally agree that though NCLB is not perfect, introducing accountability to schools puts pressure on teachers and administrators to get the most out of their resources in order to prepare students for the real world.
Works Cited

Azin, Mariam, and Resendez, Miriam G. "Measuring Student Progress: Changes and Challenges

Under No Child Left Behind." New Directions for Evaluation no. 117 (2008): 71-84.

Hanushek, Eric a., and Raymond, Margaret E. "Does School Accountability…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Azin, Mariam, and Resendez, Miriam G. "Measuring Student Progress: Changes and Challenges

Under No Child Left Behind." New Directions for Evaluation no. 117 (2008): 71-84.

Hanushek, Eric a., and Raymond, Margaret E. "Does School Accountability lead to Improved

Student Performance?" Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24.2 (2005): 297-327.


Cite this Document:

"No Child Left Behind --" (2010, July 03) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-12557

"No Child Left Behind --" 03 July 2010. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-12557>

"No Child Left Behind --", 03 July 2010, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-12557

Related Documents
No Child Left Behind Act-
PAGES 10 WORDS 4609

(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 3 WORDS 998

III. Other Issues and Challenges The No Child Left Behind act is viewed by many if not most of today's teachers as having tunnel vision and that acknowledges little but standardized testing outcomes. Specifically reported by Dillon (2009) in the 2009 New York Times article entitled: "No Child Law Is Not Closing a Racial Gap" that there has not been a narrowing of the gap between white and minority students in

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 16 WORDS 4890

These authors note that the obstacles for ELL students are particularly challenging, given that they include both educational and technical issues. These challenges include the following: Historically low ELL performance and very slow improvement. State tests show that ELL students' academic performance is far below that of other students, oftentimes 20 to 30 percentage points lower, and usually shows little improvement across many years. Measurement accuracy. Research shows that the language

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 7 WORDS 1984

There are over 4.4 million ELs enrolled in U.S. public schools, a number that has doubled during the last decade, making ELs roughly 10% of the total enrollment nationwide (Conrad 2005). The demographic increases demonstrate to government agencies that more needs to be done to support and ensure their integration and success in the educational process, and standardized testing in English is the least appropriate way to meet their

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 2 WORDS 599

In principle, it is now believed that the traditional emphasis on passive learning through lectures and textbook methods of instruction are far less effective than active methods of academic instruction. Whereas modern educators have been pushing for public education systems to move away from passive learning methods, the NCLB creates the exact opposite incentive: to waste classroom modules memorizing information for the test and practicing test-taking instead of learning

No Child Left Behind Act.
PAGES 3 WORDS 999

Review and Comment Indications suggest that Obama will endorse a rewritten version of No Child Left Behind once requirements like teacher quality and academic standards are toughened up to focus more attention on failing schools. This will mean more, not less, federal involvement in the program. Overall, reaction to Obama's plans are negative. Most who were opposed to Bush's policy had hoped for a brand new start rather than a rehash