Non-Moral Or Religious Standpoint; While Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
983
Cite

Part 4 -- Just War and Iraq -- it can be very difficult to define intangible philosophies or actions that are both part of the human psyche and that seem obvious. One of these such intangibles is war. What is war? Each historical period has added a new meaning to the word, but the essence of it still remained the same. War is always associated with terror, cruelty and unhappiness. There are really five elements that allow a just war: cause, authority, intention, hope for success, and proportionality. Without becoming too cynical, most scholars would probably agree that the first Iraqi war was "Just" but the second, under Bush II, was not. There were clear distinctions. In the first, Iraq invaded a soverign country, Kuwait, who asked for aid and protection; in the second, data was never fully disclosed as to the infamous weapons of mass destruction, and later found to be exaggerated and false, thus not allowing for most of the principles of justness; but more as an economic excuse (Coady, 2008, 58-60).

Part 5 -- the argument for the use of the second atomic bomb, against Nagasaki, is essentially a moral argument based on utilitarianism. What decision resulted in the greatest good for the greatest number? If more people would die based on prolonging the war, invading Japan, and a potential invasion from the Soviets, then the use of the second bomb did save lives. In all five tests, dropping the second bomb appeared to be just...

...

We must remember, we had been at war for four years with Japan; Japan had committed numerous aggressive acts and actions that were immoral even during the time of war. The Japanese military, who all intelligence believed still held the power in Japan, operated under a tradition that it was better to die with honor than to surrender. For months, the Allies had been intensely fire-bombing Japanese cities, with still no end in sight; and Japan had been warned in the Potsdam Declaration of July 26th. Hiroshima was destroyed on August 6th, after which President Truman again warned that another attack would occur, unless Japan capitulated -- they did not, and then on August 9th, Nagasaki was destroyed. Clearly, warning had been given, it was likely that Japan did not take Truman's threats seriously (Sherwin, 2003).
Coady, C. Morality and Political Violence. New York: Cambrdige University Press,

2008.

Goodman, K., ed. The Case of Terri Schiavo: Ethics, Politics, and Death in the 21st

Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

"Information for Research on Euthanasia." December 2009. Euthanasia.com. .

Overview of Arguments Against Euthanasia." January 2010. BBC Ethics Guide. .

Sherwin, M. A World Destroyed. Stanford University Press, 2003.

Sources Used in Documents:

"Information for Research on Euthanasia." December 2009. Euthanasia.com. <http://www.euthanasia.com/index.html>.

Overview of Arguments Against Euthanasia." January 2010. BBC Ethics Guide. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/against/against_1.shtml>.

Sherwin, M. A World Destroyed. Stanford University Press, 2003.


Cite this Document:

"Non-Moral Or Religious Standpoint While" (2011, January 26) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/non-moral-or-religious-standpoint-while-5283

"Non-Moral Or Religious Standpoint While" 26 January 2011. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/non-moral-or-religious-standpoint-while-5283>

"Non-Moral Or Religious Standpoint While", 26 January 2011, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/non-moral-or-religious-standpoint-while-5283

Related Documents

Moral Questions and Moral Theory: Organ Donation The issue of organ donation seems as though it would be simple. When a person dies, he or she no longer needs organs and those organs could be used to save the life of someone else (Appel, 2005). However, the issue is not as black and white as that for many people. Some are very against organ donation because they do not believe in

Religious Hospitals
PAGES 6 WORDS 1961

JGH Profile Privacy The author of this report is asked to profile and otherwise answer questions regarding Canadian company JGH. A description of the services and structure will be offered and then the author will speak of the management theories and practices that the company engages in. How obvious and transparent these practices are will be discussed and whether or not it would be prudent and wise of JGH to continue that

Relativity of Moral Truth
PAGES 2 WORDS 649

Relativity of Moral Truth The viewpoints on moral truth are varied within circles of philosophic thought. Moral ethics are, for the most part, relative, though on what grounds of relative truth is a subject of much discussion. Three positions will be discussed in this paper: the topic of the Divine Command Theory, Ruth Benedict's beliefs in cultural relativism, and Thomas Nagel's morality of rational consistency. Of the three, Nagel's relative moral

A Holistic Psychology of Persons: Implications for Theory and PracticeSummaryDavid N. Entwistle\\\'s (2009) article, \\\"A Holistic Psychology of Persons: Implications for Theory and Practice,\\\" explores the implications of holistic psychology in understanding people\\\'s psychological functioning and well-being from the standpoint of a Christian psychologist. Entwistle�s (2009) point is to identify and evaluate the legal and ethical concerns that a psychologist applying a Christian framework to a client�s issues might face.

Although Lundman was evidently the first case to award damages for faith healing, prosecutions of parents whose children die under similar circumstances are reasonably common.(64) Many of the cases involve Christian Scientists who do not accept the superiority of contemporary medicine to their faith-based care; and many others involve Jehovah's Witnesses, who do not accept blood transfusions because of the biblical prohibition on ingesting blood.(65) but official punishment is

The immorality of Abortion from Deontology and Divine Command Perspectives I. Introduction The moral question of abortion is whether one is morally justified in killing a child growing in the womb. In section 1, I will summarize the argument. In section 2, I will explain my view on the moral question. In section 3, I will discuss two objections to my view. In section 4, I will provide a response to these