Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Nonprofit vs. For-Profit Healthcare Organizations
Healthcare organizations, both profit and non-profit, are designed to help people in need. However, sometimes that goal fails because of the notions of performance that are used in the private sector (i.e. for-profit). These are not the same as the notions used in the public sector (i.e. nonprofit) (Speckbacher, 2003). Private sector health care is based much more closely on economic theory than public sector health care, and that greatly affects how patients are treated, even though many in the industry will insist that there is no change in how patients are received in either type of organization (Speckbacher, 2003). In order to understand the difference between the two kinds of healthcare organizations, one must consider the way they are operated and maintained.
For-profit healthcare is part of the private sector, and is designed for making money as well as for helping patients. Non-profit healthcare still makes money, but it is not set up to make a profit as a private sector business. Instead, it belongs to the public sector, like governmental entities,...
But does that affect the way in which the patients are treated? Do they get better care at one type of facility as opposed to the other type of facility? That is something that many people are questioning, especially as healthcare changes in the United States, and something for which there is no clear answer.
Most of the answers on that issue are conjecture, opinion, and speculation, but Ha & Reschovsky (2002) did analyze the medical care in both of these types of organizations. The researchers came to the conclusion that non-profit medical care was more satisfactory than for-profit medical care, but their method was based on the self-reporting (i.e. opinion) of people who had received care. Because of that, there is still questions as to whether there is a significant difference in the treatment or standard of care between people who see doctors or visit hospitals that are for-profit vs. non-profit.
Other studies into the issue have also been conducted. In 2002, Brickley and…
References
Brickley, J.A., & Van Horn, R.L. (2002). Managerial incentives in non-profit organizations: Evidence from hospitals. Journal of Law & Economics, 45(227).
Ha, T.T. & Reschovsky, J.D. (2002). Assessments of medical care by enrollees in for-profit and nonprofit health maintenance organizations. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346.
Speckbacher, G. (2003). The economics of performance management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13(3).
Healthcare Organization Case Study Health Care Organization Case Study Banner Healthcare Health Care Organization Case Study Banner Healthcare represents a set of diverse healthcare related facilities that provide healthcare services to societies in USA and beyond. Banner seeks to establish a healthier life for communities through developing a healthy environment. Banner Healthcare is arguably the largest healthcare provider in the country. The organization spans seven states, including Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Alaska, Nebraska and
Conclusion Based on the information currently available, the Canadian health care system is the more utilitarian and is, therefore, the better approach but those facing the need for advanced and expedient care would certainly argue otherwise. Therein lies the problem and therein lies the challenge for American society. Even the most ardent proponents of employer-based insurance plans would dare not argue that having great numbers of uninsured is the price that
Overview of the Organization: Ronald McDonald HouseAlthough most people are familiar with McDonald�s because of its burgers and fries, the Ronald McDonald House is the charitable, nonprofit arm of the organization. The Ronald McDonald House supports critically ill children and their families. According to its �About Us� section of its website, 90% of all children�s hospitals are adjacent to at least one RMH. Its charity programs also raise funds for
Organization Project Intermountain was started as a small healthcare nonprofit organization, situated in Salt Lake City. With its well-crafted mission, a clearly stated vision, patient's oriented philosophy and a strategy to manage the organization effectively; it was soon able to manage over 32,000 employees. Helping the acute healthcare needs of Southeastern Idaho and Utah's residents, Intermountain's well-managed system of about 23 hospitals, clinics, physicians and health strategies; deliver clinically exceptional medical
Healthcare Reform "Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital" The case of Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital was a case that attempted to end the segregation of African-American and Whites in the U.S. hospitals and medical professions as a whole. The case challenged the use of public funds to maintain and expand the segregated hospital care in the United States. Source of the laws related to the case are: Title VII
Healthcare Policy Systems: Hong Kong, Australia VOUCHERS FOR THE ELDERLY Healthcare Policy Systems in Hong Kong and Australia Primary Health Care for the Elderly in Hong Kong Primary care is the starting point in the healthcare process (PCO, 2011). A good one is made available to the public for a comprehensive, holistic, coordinated and in locations accessible to where people live or work. It also provides preventive care and optimal disease management. In Hong