Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
). Can Afghanistan be part of a containment process that is developed in parallel with a dialogue with Russia?
There is no straight answer to this question, but one has reasons to believe that this is potentially an approach used by the new administration. One should note, however, also the fact that stability in Afghanistan is of great interest to Russia as well, which is why the administration in Moscow has really shown its interest in working with the U.S. In stabilizing Afghanistan. There are several reasons for this. First, an unstable and uncontrolled Afghanistan is a source of drugs, which generally find the market in Moscow a very profitable one. Second, an insecure Afghanistan is a source of potential extremist and fundamentalist Islam, which is a great source of concern for Russia, especially given its own troubles with the republics in the Northern Caucasus and the terrorist acts that Islamists have organized in Russia (namely Beslan or the attack on the Moscow theatre).
The potential surge in the military effectives of the U.S. In Afghanistan is not due to the necessity of either containing Russia or a conflict with the Muslim civilizations. As it has been shown in this paper, these types of scenarios are circumstantial and explicable only at a certain moment in history. It is certain that Russia is more aggressive now, but it was not so in 2001, when the campaign was launched. At the same time, the new administration in Washington has clearly showed an intention of discussing with its European partners and an openness to dialogue with the Muslim world, including with countries with opposite interests.
The only explanation that does stand its ground is the fact that Afghanistan has a strategic position between the East and West and in the proximity of the Middle East and that a stable and secure Afghanistan would also be in the interest of the entire area. At the same time, another good explanation of the increase in the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan is given by the asymmetrical threats that the world faces, many of them originating in countries such as Afghanistan.
These types of risks and threats including drugs and weapons trafficking, as well as person trafficking, but, most of all, the terrorist threat. In terms of the different forms of trafficking, these have numerous negative effects at a global level. Drug trafficking obviously encourages consumption by ensuring that there is a constant supply of drugs on the global market. Afghanistan is the number one producer of poppies from which most of the opium-based drugs are made. Additionally, opium is the most important export in Afghanistan. A reduction of the opium trade having Afghanistan as its starting point would reduce consumption worldwide and help the global effort and fight against narcotics.
With weapons trafficking the effects are significant and with a similar global perspective. The bottom line is that these weapons can always end up in the wrong hands, including in the hands of various terrorist groups that will be using them against either in internal civil wars or against the Western countries, both with the same horrendous effect on civilians.
It is also about the terrorist threat. A badly governed, insecure Afghanistan will lead back to the 1990s, when the Taliban had provided the needed internal security, but had also closed their eyes in the face of the terrorist entities with activities in Afghanistan. If this occurs again, then the entire effort that the U.S. has led against the wave of terrorism that started with 9/11 will have been in vain. The fight against terrorism does not start with the effects, that is, with the terrorist acts. It needs to start with fighting the causes of terrorism and eradicating the terrorist structures and entities that encourage such events.
This is why the goal of the U.S. troops and personnel in Afghanistan will need to be not only the eradication and fight against terrorist entities, but the creation of functional institutions, an increase in the standard of living and providing the basic necessities for the Afghan population. This is also why many of the projects that the U.S. proposes for the region include electricity connection with Central Asia or borderline security programs.
So, the Obama Administration's efforts in Afghanistan should go beyond the simple fight against the enemy structure and more towards reconstruction and stabilization of a country in need of some of the basic functionalities of any region or economy. With that ensured, the fight against the Taliban will be much more sustained and successful in the future.
1. Eckholm, Eric. A Nation challenged: Penalties; Taliban Justice: Stadium Was Scene of Gory Punishment. The New York Times. December 2001. On the Internet at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00E6DD1231F935A15751C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all.Lastretrieved on March 14, 2009
2. Griffiths, John C. Afghanistan: A History of Conflict. Andre Deutsch, London. Updated edition, 2001. Andre Deutsch Ltd., 2002
3. Rashid, Ahmed. "Taliban - Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia," Yale University Press, 2000.
4. Toynbee, Arnold J.Between Oxus and Jumna. Oxford University Press, London. 1961
5. Huntington, Samuel P., the Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1996
Eckholm, Eric. A Nation challenged: Penalties; Taliban Justice: Stadium Was Scene of Gory Punishment. The New York Times. December 2001. On the Internet at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00E6DD1231F935A15751C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all.Lastretrieved on March 14, 2009[continue]
"Obama Administration And B Obama" (2009, March 15) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/obama-administration-and-b-23919
"Obama Administration And B Obama" 15 March 2009. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/obama-administration-and-b-23919>
"Obama Administration And B Obama", 15 March 2009, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/obama-administration-and-b-23919
While people who work with these kinds of issues can present their best guesses, they cannot actually provide proof that the Obama Administration's health care plan is good or bad, or how much it will cost. The 'if only' propositions that are in much of the plan tend to make statisticians and fact-checkers nervous, simply because of the nature of these kinds of propositions -- they rely on the
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act begun in the Bush administration and have actually been verified by the Obama administration. "This offers a reason for positive outlook about the capability of the insurance coverage growth in the Affordable Care Act to enhance access to and for grownups, however it recommends that doing away with the law or reducing the protection growth might lead to ongoing erosion of grownups' access
In the course of his campaign, Obama inspired millions of Americans - young and old, rich and poor, rural and urban, and from every racial and ethnic background. When Obama walked into the room. . The crowd was transfixed (Tufankjuan, 2008). The goal, of course, is that in politics, as well as society, race plays no part in the decision process. Thanks to previous Civil Rights advocates, and people
Obama Urges Tougher Laws on Financial Fraud In the wake of the Wall Street bank bailouts and the various security fraud cases that have occurred nationally the Obama administration has been under pressure to enact new legislation that effectively prosecutes financial fraud cases. Critics have argued that financial regulators have lacked the tools necessary to properly investigate and prosecute the financial executives who were responsible for the near collapse that occurred
Kant was no exception to the paradigmatic priorities (i.e. objectivity as knowledge) of the era, and brief reference to the episteme is serves accuracy in discursive analysis of this heritage within American politics and policy thought. For instance, Kant's Critique of Judgment is enormously influential in establishing a connection between judgment and political and moral precepts to conduct in communities. Intellectual lineage to Kant's model of Enlightenment 'reason" combines
Obama energy policy in relation to the economy of the United State of America's 21st century economy. It begins with a general description of the policies and then proceeds and outlines the various elements of the policy. After the analysis the paper then presents the criticisms that are waged against the policy. A conclusions and recommendations are then presented at the end of the paper. These are geared towards
Obama Care Plan Health care is undergoing a dramatic transformation and needless to say it is one of our largest industries that contribute handsomely to the Gross Domestic Product, greater demands are placed for the value of dollars that are being spent to provide for healthcare services to patients. Now-a-days, in this ever demanding environment marketing as a discipline is being practiced (Berkowitz, October 2010) In early days it was a great