Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
To reduce disruptive behavior in class, Mr. Byrne has two main options. He could use positive punishments that go beyond mere scolding -- things like adding extra homework for those who misbehave, increasing in-class work, making kids feel ashamed by singling them out or putting them out of the classroom, and even going as far as to do actual physical punishment (if the school allows mild striking). The kids will want to avoid these and will do so by not being disruptive. Mr. Byrne can also use negative punishments that withdraw pleasure -- things like taking away free time, separating the disruptive classmates from each other (move them to different desks) so that their capacity to interact is gone, giving detentions which remove fun time, and confiscating cell phones and video games or other items that bring the student joy. If they know they will lose something they want, they will be less likely to engage in acts that will lead to such consequences. Both of these methods may be effective in reducing disruptive behavior.
To...
Byrne can use reinforcements. When the cooperative behavior occurs, Mr. Byrne should reinforce it positively with things like verbal praise, affirmation, and other statements that make the student feel good for acting well and give them a sense of pride or satisfaction. He could also give them physical rewards -- prizes they can win or special temporary privileges that make them feel good, like being a group leader or a hall monitor. Another way of increasing cooperation is to withdraw unpleasant things when the good behavior occurs. For example, if the class is kept out of break time because of bad behavior, but during that time they behave well, Mr. Byrne could let them out earlier than he said. Or he could assign homework at the beginning of class, but then cancel it if the class behaves well. These are good ways of reinforcing constructive behavior. The students are more likely to cooperate.
Bibliography
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Bibliography
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Conditioning Classical and operant conditioning are types of behavioral learning. Subsets of behavioral psychology, classical and operant conditioning show how a subject (animal or human) can exhibit relatively permanent changes in behavior due to certain types of experiences. According to Cryver (2000), learning is a "fundamental process" in all animals. Classical conditioning is also known as "learning by association." Association in this sense refers to the association of a behavior with a
This technique is called shaping, as the teacher starts with information students already know and then new information is broken into small pieces. In teaching vocabulary, the teacher is more likely to suggest or work with the textbook, and the setting of a democratic environment based on common agreement is not such an important fact as in the humanistic approach. The lesson starts with a revision and review of the information
The rate of such behavior was considered to be significant as a measure of responsive strength (Skinner 1938, 1966, 1986; Killeen & Hall 2001). True or not, the emphasis on response rate has resulted in a scarcity of investigational work by operant conditioners on non-recurrent behavior such as movement in space. Operant conditioning differs from other type of learning study in one important aspect. The focus has been more or
In contrast, negative behavior such as pulling things off of shelves, running away, or taunting a sibling, may result in the small child being forced to hold his mother's hand, and the privilege of being permitted to wander around is thus withdrawn. This creates a type of operant conditioning known as negative reinforcement: the child does not like being constrained. The parent tells the child: 'if you behave, I will
B.F. Skinner is often associated with behavioral psychology, it is Edward Thorndike who set the stage for field. Thorndike's Law of Effect (1901) that successful behaviors tend to be repeated and unsuccessful ones do not set the stage for modern theorists along with the work of Pavlov (1927). Thus we now know that reinforcement always increases the probability that a behavior will occur or be repeated (Skinner, 1953). Positive
Social Cognitive Theory The author of this brief report has been asked to offer definitions of two key theories and terms from the general subject of psychology. Those two terms are social cognitive theory (SCT) and the other is classical condition. There will also be reference to operant conditioning. The words about this subject will emanate from the work of Guy Lefrancois and this treatise called Theories of Human Learning. The