Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Research Paper:
The "bookends" of the model being organization work settings and members is accurate and pragmatic as well.
In the authors' analysis of the conceptual models for understanding organizational change in chapter 8 illustrates the depth of his expertise in the academic field and his pragmatism at translating theory into results. It must have been the most challenging chapter of the book to write as it moves quickly between the theoretical and the pragmatic. It also shows through examples, both academic and from actual experience, just how capricious, even chaotic organizational change is to manage and make permanent. Clearly the author has reservations about the classical Lewin Model of change and provides a thoughtful analysis using Dr. Edgar Schein's models on corporate culture research to more fully define the three-step Lewin process. What is interesting about the progression of the analysis of the Lewin Model is the inclusion of phases of planned change as defined by Dr. Lippitt. Dr. Burke is trying to show the three-step process as defined by Lewin is too simplistic given the chaotic nature of organizational change. He is also showing that for change strategies anchored on Lewin's theories to be effective, they must also have taken the time to create insightful analysis into how the steps impact a given organization. While this chapter is light on its references to Malcolm Gladwell's the Tipping Point which is otherwise quoted throughout Dr. Burkes' book there are allegorical references in how Dr. Burke illustrates through analysis of organizations just how critical it is to pay attention to the smaller processes if the larger management change strategy is to be effective.
The Burke-Litwin Model for organizational change is also analyzed from the standpoint of Dr. David McClelland's contributions of individual's propensities for motivation to change. The author navigates the next few chapters well, mixing the theoretical models as a means to show the process-based approaches to making organizational change with the pragmatic lessons learned of a practitioner. He completes this analysis with an assessment of how the individual attributes of each model matter far more than the far-reaching, ore environmentally based ones. In this way he communicates that for lasting change to occur in any organization that has got to be an internalization of the goals and objectives they are based on. Without this there is no lasting change, he seems to be implying through the framework and model analysis completed. These points together then form an excellent foundation for the last chapters of the book that center on transformational leadership. These last chapters also form an excellent capstone series that tie together the best and worst practices of organizational change, the core concepts and frameworks and models, and the strategies for overcoming resistance to change. These chapters were the most prescriptive in how to transform management into leadership in the context of organizational change. They were also interesting to see how Dr. Burke analyses the phases of organizational change an how the practical lessons learned made the process more challenging and daunting that it is often made out to be. Throughout the book there is also the common thread of how chaotic change can be over time and how transformational leaders need to create a resiliency and trust to be effective. These chapters define transformational leadership in those contexts and also provide insights into real-world examples of how the authors' process-centricism has made a different. The use of hybrid models of transformational and transactional leadership also is useful for seeing how rewards are defined and fulfilled.
Organizational change is never a one-and-done proposition, and to make change effective and last, there are more complexities than many theorists and managers list in their advice. This book provides a solid foundation that shows just how chaotic change can be and that situational leadership that can transform and reward is crucial. It also shows that worst practices in organizational change happen when plans are too dogmatically adhered to. The author brings a message of organizational agility and the need to listen and respond to the complexities of change, not try to overcome it with an engineered response. Trust as the catalyst of change and the ability to internalize change…[continue]
"Organizational Behavior Organization Change Theory" (2009, October 22) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-organization-change-18375
"Organizational Behavior Organization Change Theory" 22 October 2009. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-organization-change-18375>
"Organizational Behavior Organization Change Theory", 22 October 2009, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-organization-change-18375
Yet, they do exist and can once again be said that the eight stage process has its roots in the theories enounced by John M. Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske and Michael T. Matteson. Throughout the book for instance, the three authors discuss organizational behavior aspects such as communications or conflict, which could easily interfere with the change process. To take one step forward however, the editing team also argues that
Accordingly, a McDonald's restaurant team is successively inter-reliant (Daft, 2008). Deprived of everyone working in unison and having adequate inspiration to deliver respectable and rapid good service, all members of the team usually fail. Consequently of one person losing inspiration or flopping to sufficiently achieve his duties, clients can protest and business can fail and be lost. Although most workers are trained to achieve multiple errands at numerous stations, they
Organizational Behavior The Transformation of JC Penny for the New Century Organizational behavior is the study of how the actions of individuals, groups, and structures influence the behavior of an organization. Organizational culture refers to the characteristics that define the organization and make them unique. Organizational culture refers to communication styles, management styles, interaction styles, policies and procedures, as well as the manner of dress within the organization. Organizational culture influences organizational
Organization Behavior "Performance Management" and "People Performance" Performance Management and People "Performance Management" and "People Performance" Management SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to discuss and critically evaluate the Performance Management model by Michael Armstrong and People Performance model by John Purcell. The paper starts with an ample introduction and significance of the employee performance management practices and proceeds by discussing the various concepts and strategies which are incorporated by business organizations all over
But Wal-Mart has been more successful where Kmart has failed. The author of the study explains this difference with the treatment, importance and role played and offered to the human resource. "Kmart and Wal-Mart are virtually identical, right? Yet most people prefer to shop at Wal-Mart. Kmart recently declared bankruptcy. Could the reason for this be as fundamental as leadership style and the resultant employee attitude? I believe so.
Organizational Behavior If you learned about organizational behavior, what can you learn from the organizational behavior? Organizational behavior: Lessons learned Organizational behavior is defined as "the study and application of knowledge about how people, individuals, and groups act in organizations" (Clark 2011). The basic premise behind organizational behavior is that people act in a fundamentally different manner in the context of organizations. The presence of others and the context of the organization elicit
Yet, from their operations it can be observed that the need for contingency is generally reduced as the company has the ability to succeed at mostly any endeavor. Nonetheless, in this time of a competition fiercer than ever and growing consumer demands, some of Microsoft's products have failed to generate the expected outcome. The most commonly used example in this sense was the operating system Windows '98, which replaced