Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … mandatory minimums a drop crime additional problems; based information readings personal research, attributed reduction crime? Do agree findings mandatory minimums ineffectual? How -strike laws? Page 2 Research locate a news article op-ed addresses issue relevant unit.
Society has seen an increasing number of states implementing mandatory minimums as a means to deter criminals. Mandatory minimums involve judges having to impose sentences that are in accordance with a particular law and thus provide criminals with no less than a specific amount of time behind bars as long as the criminal meets certain criteria. Mandatory minimums have been designed to guarantee that the country achieves a series of goals with regard to common crimes such as drug trafficking. Even with the fact that they appear to be effective in theory, information shows that mandatory minimums are not actually playing a positive role in assisting the community.
One of the reasons why crime levels dropped as a result of mandatory minimums involves higher drug prices. Dealers increase their prices as a result of facing harsher penalties and thus have...
The fact that the authorities devise more effective means to deal with dealers only means that particular deals are provided with harsh punishments. Most of them simply manage to avoid being caught as a result of perfecting their strategies. It is not necessarily that the authorities need to stop being tough on crime, as they generally need to concentrate on catching more dangerous criminals instead of pursuing small-time criminals and providing them with harsh sentences (Horwitz).
There is much controversy regarding the three-strike law, as while it is meant to keep dangerous criminals in prisons it also incarcerates smaller criminals for long periods of time on account of…
Bibliography:
Horwitz, S. "Holder seeks to avert mandatory minimum sentences for some low-level drug offenders," Retrieved September 21, 2013, from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-08-11/world/41299597_1_drug-policy-low-level-drug-offenders-sentences
Merica, D. & Perez, E. "Eric Holder seeks to cut mandatory minimum drug sentences," Retrieved September 21, 2013, from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/08/12/politics/holder-mandatory-minimums/index.html
"The Myth of Deterrence," Retrieved September 21, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/opinion/the-myth-of-deterrence.html?_r=0
Mandatory Sentencing Public policy, crime, and criminal justice Mandatory Sentencing: Case Study Critique The prime grounds of mandatory sentencing laws are utilitarian. The laws come with long prison sentences for recidivists, drug dealers and isolation of violent criminals from the community aiming at preventing them from committing additional crimes outside the prison walls. In addition, the design of mandatory sentencing aim at deterring and portraying a harsh reflection to potential offenders of the
Prison Industrial Complex as Another Form of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing US sentencing policies are still lean which has led to the federal government to incarcerate so many people. There are too many criminals committing too many crimes, and this explains why we have too many prisoners. Currently, the government's prison is holding 200,000-armed robbers, 150,000 sex offenders and 100 murderers (Davis, 2008). These people are enough to make fill a city.
Variations of the area court model, such as teen courts, medicine courts, and household physical violence courts, focus on specific concerns in order to establish even more extensive options. The underlying presumption of neighborhood courts is that neighborhoods are deeply damaged by the sentencing procedure yet are seldom spoken with and associated with judicial results. Correcting Community justice has actually been slowest to show up in the correctional industry. Maybe this
Therefore, by increasing the costs of imprisonment by the three strikes law, it is intended that there will be less crime. Marwell and Moody express several difficulties with the laws in the 24 states: Criminals are not always aware of the laws, at least not initially; repeat criminals can be expected to serve substantial prison terms even in the absence of the laws; almost all of the states already
instant case are typical of many criminal cases presented to the courts on a daily basis and the role and responsibilities of the principals remain essentially the same. The prosecutor in the case has the primary duty to ensure that justice is done. This duty applies not only to the victim, but also applies as to the defendant. In the instant case this requires that the prosecutor make every
A judge's discretion can mean the difference between a young African-American person going to jail and having his or her life irreparably damaged or being placed in a program that might have a chance to save a human being. While judges cannot be caseworkers, they can look at the circumstances of a young offender's life to make rational and reasoned evaluations of someone's risk to society. This can be demonstrated