Personality Styles My Personality And Communication Style Essay

Personality Styles My personality and communication style

My personality and communication style is what Taylor (2010) would describe in "five factor" terms (447) as moderate extrovert, which implies significant introvert; moderate conscientious, which means that I can tolerate some deviation from form if content dictates; high on agreeability and openness, and low relative to the norm on neuroticism. My communication style is verbal, accomodative but not infinitely so, solution-oriented and not Machiavellian or vindictive (Taylor, 2010, p. 447), and I at least intellectually seek what Kotchemidova (2010) calls "egalitarian friendliness" (209).

Interactions with differing styles cause difficulties at work

This causes episodic difficulties and stress for me at the restaurant where I work as pantry chef, with some employees with different traits and communication styles. These are the minority however, and other co-workers provide examples that are free of conflict even though our character endowments and communication styles differ. Jeff is one waiter among twenty who I would diagnose as high-neurotic, non-verbal, low on agreeability and openness, and highly conscientious. From this behavior, Taylor (2010) might locate Jeff's "Locus of Control" (448) as external, because he uses nonverbal, affective behavior to discourage deviation from accepted structures, holds grudges through sullenness and reprisal, and becomes argumentative when procedure deviates from rigid hierarchies. When an order comes up before his, he becomes confrontational in a non-verbal way, hoarding orders and delivering them in a batch instead of a flow; haggling about presentation, and grumbling about kitchen service among the rest of the floor staff in a Machiavellian attempt to turn them against us and each other.

...

She is extroverted, overly verbal, helpful and encouraging to a point Kotchemidova would call "impulsive...and frivolous" (210), disrupting the kitchen by trying to 'help' and encourage, which often ends up as confounding rather than solving problems. This creates conflict when I am trying to provide service to the line cooks; salads to the floor staff, or assist the dishwasher's order of operations. Elizabeth's overly expressive and assertive "can do" attitude also comes into opposition with Connor the line cook's incessant joking, which might be funny in other contexts (Mitchell, Graesser and Louwerse, 2010), but disrupt operations usually at the time when they are least useful and aggravate other teammates' communication differences. Connor would probably rank high-verbal, low-conscientious but high-neurotic and with a locus of power centered in a structure he does not like, so his interjections end up more sarcastic than funny. He retreats from confrontation upon verbal opposition, which would indicate agreeability, but in a negativistic presentation.
This is all balanced by task-oriented and high-verbal Rita, the expediter, whose locus of control (Taylor, 2010) is by designation internally centered as authorized by the General Manager, being the facilitator of all these conflicting communication and personality styles. Rita commands rather than negotiates, because both wait staff and cook line, including myself, have a stake in the smoothest possible performance, and we recognize Rita has a stake in the highest possible output. Rita is highly verbal and open, but low-agreeable, assertive but I would say low-to-moderate neurotic at the same time as strongly conscientious (Taylor 2010). Rita sets the norms, mediates conflict and regulates the "emotion culture"…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

de Vries, R., Bakker-Pieper, A., and Oostenveld, W. (2010). Leadership =

communication? The relations of leaders' communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business Psychology 25, 367-380. Retrieved from: DOI 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2

Kotchemidova, C. (2010, Apr.). Emotion culture and cognitive constructions of reality.

Communication Quarterly 58 (2), 207-234. Retrieved from: DOI: 10.1080/01463371003717892


Cite this Document:

"Personality Styles My Personality And Communication Style" (2011, August 05) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-styles-my-personality-and-communication-51727

"Personality Styles My Personality And Communication Style" 05 August 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-styles-my-personality-and-communication-51727>

"Personality Styles My Personality And Communication Style", 05 August 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-styles-my-personality-and-communication-51727

Related Documents

Here, people always attribute causes to actions and happenings, with the belief that everything has an explanation only if we could look deeper enough (Changing Minds, 2011). This theory serves to show how people have very different perspectives to happenings or events in the daily lives, and these varying views can easily stray into power imbalance, prejudice and such like vices ultimately affecting the communication process. Under attribution theory, there

Although interpersonal and group level communications reside at a lower level than organizational communication, they are major forms of communication in organizations and are prominently addressed in the organizational communication literature. Recently, as organizations became more communication-based, greater attention was directed at improving the interpersonal communication skills of all organizational members. Historically, informal communication was primarily seen as a potential block to effective organizational performance. This is no longer

Women and men vary not only in their choice of language but also in their conversational behavior. Differences have been found in turn-taking (who speaks when), expressivity, the selection of topics, and the use of humor. Men have been found to take more turns and to talk more in mixed groups, in part because they interrupt women more often and answer questions not addressed to them. Turn-taking violations may take

Communication Abilities Comparison of my personal relationships with two people. Man is a social animal and every individual is involved in different kinds of relationships with other individuals throughout their lives. Some of these relationships are close and permanent, e.g., blood relationships with our parents and children or temporary, fleeting relationships like our relationships with fellow travelers during a train or an air journey. The quality and type of relationship is determined

] Younger people (18- to 34-year-olds) are much more likely to view television news as mainly interested in serving the public interest (57.5% vs. 46.7%). Creating a local brand and attracting the most viewers is the name of the game in the battle for ratings and revenues. The local newscast defines the image of the station, and now more than ever local stations need up-to-date newscasts to keep audiences tuned in.

Communication Competence: An Assessment of Male Verses Female College Athletes Underreporting Injuries to Coaches The interaction between the coach of the team and the players is considered to be one of the most important factors that influence the performance of the team. Many analysts believe that it is very important for the players to have a comfort level with the coach so that they can communicate with them without any hesitation.