Philosophy Of Horror: Or Paradoxes Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
704
Cite
Related Topics:

The term "art-horror" was new, and after the author defined it, it made perfect sense. There are differences in the genre between films, books, and theater, and it is easy to see how much of the horror genre could be considered "art-horror." In addition, the section on plotting was extremely enlightening, especially the characteristic horror plots, which were extremely familiar once the author laid them out. In addition, the author's definitions of different genres and how they are analyzed was helpful in showing the vast differences between genres and what they hope to accomplish.

This book helped put the entire horror genre into better focus. If anyone is interested in writing horror novels, this book should be on their list of books to read and emulate. The author has a deep understanding of the horror genre, but more than that, he seems to respect and admire it, which would serve anyone interesting in creating it quite well. The author's analysis of films, plot lines, characters, and even monsters is in-depth and helpful for anyone interested in...

...

After reading this book, viewing horror films is more interesting, and more intricate, which seems to be the author's ultimate purpose. It is interesting to note how the author says that horror films touch an emotional chord in the viewer. At first glance, I would not have thought that, but with the author's explanation, it makes good sense. Fear and disgust are emotions just as love and trust are, and those emotions are definitely awakened in films like "Jaws," "Carrie," the "Halloween" series, and numerous others.
Finally, the author's analysis of "why" people want to be horrified was extremely enlightening. It helped make the entire genre come together and make sense. Horror is a paradox, and there is something about it that keeps drawing viewers back, no matter how horrible the monsters and the mayhem. This author explains the genre well, and reading this book makes much more sense and art out of the horror genre.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Carroll, Noel. The Philosophy of Horror, Or, Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge, 1990.


Cite this Document:

"Philosophy Of Horror Or Paradoxes" (2006, December 19) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-horror-or-paradoxes-40832

"Philosophy Of Horror Or Paradoxes" 19 December 2006. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-horror-or-paradoxes-40832>

"Philosophy Of Horror Or Paradoxes", 19 December 2006, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-horror-or-paradoxes-40832

Related Documents

Art Philosophy Tragedy in Art The newspapers are forever mentioning the word, 'tragedy'. It usually means that there has been a death or deaths associated with a catastrophic event. Surprisingly, this is in keeping with the use of tragedy as described by Aristotle: that it should evoke the emotions of pity and fear in the presence of an action of a certain magnitude. Pablo Picasso's 1937 mural, Guernica: Testimony of War, is

wisdom of Socrates today: The Consolations of Philosophy by Alain de Botton The first chapter of Alain de Botton's The Consolations of Philosophy is set in an art museum. The author gazes upon an image of David's The Death of Socrates. De Botton contrasts his desire to be liked with the Greek philosopher's willingness to be unpopular, to the point of accepting a death sentence. "If the postcard [I bought

Secular Humanism the Rise and
PAGES 75 WORDS 20795

This work provided an intensive discussion historical forces that were to lead to modern humanism but also succeeds in placing these aspects into the context of the larger social, historical and political milieu. . Online sources and databases proved to be a valid and often insightful recourse area for this topic. Of particular note is a concise and well-written article by Stephen Weldon entitled Secular Humanism in the United States.

The boy had conflicting religious training. Officially, he was Catholic, but his grandfather's Protestantism influenced him greatly. He learned little of the major philosophers of the day because they were not given attention at the French university of the time, but he would encounter them later when he was in his twenties. He passed his written examination for the agregation on his second try and fulfilled his military service

. . while defending these institutions themselves" (1034-1035). Peled further argues that Rousseau was not able to solve this paradox and it was one of the reasons why he became increasingly pessimistic about modernity. But Rousseau's attempts to reconcile the contradiction in his approach are worth looking at in details. Although Rousseau abhorred inequality that rose out of private property, he did not hold any illusions about modernity. He believed

As a character, Celie's own experiences have not engaged her on the same levels that Shug's sexual experiences have. This is to say that Celie's life and collection of experiences have not been personally gratifying or freeing in the way that Shug suggest sexual experiences should or can be. To Shug, sex is more about the personal gratification and the freedom of bodily and emotional expression that comes with