Probation and Parole Programs Individuals Who Are Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Probation and Parole Programs

Individuals who are unfamiliar with the criminal justice system may think that a convicted criminal is sentenced to a certain period of time in prison and when released has paid his -- or her -- debt to society in full and is as free as anyone without a criminal record. However, in most cases, prisoners released from jail or prison are sentenced to additional time on probation or parole as a sort of transitional phase in their lives during which they have a much higher level of supervision than does the ordinary individual. This period of time is -- ideally -- one in which each individual can make a smooth transition back to ordinary civilian life while at the same time posing a reduced risk to public safety.

A few basic definitions will be useful at this point. While "probation" and "parole" are parallel terms, they can refer to different legal statuses, depending on the jurisdiction. In many states, probation refers to early release from jail, or the period following release from jail. Jails are used to incarcerate inmates who have been convicted of relatively minor crimes (or are awaiting trial, but this type of inmate is not eligible for probation). Jail in the United States is almost always used for inmates who have a year or less to serve.

Probation, on the other hand, is a term that is applied to inmates who have been released (early or not) from prison. They have been convicted of more serious crimes and served sentences of longer than one year. Because they have been convicted of more serious crimes and so may be assumed to be more dangerous to others and also because they have been incarcerated for a longer period of time and so may be assumed to face a harder time re-integrating into society -- the conditions for those on parole tend to be more stringent than for those on probation.

The level of oversight provided to those on probation or parole tends to depend on the severity of their crime, although there are also significant variations among jurisdictions and even among parole and probation officers. In general, a minimum degree of supervision may be required by law or by policy with higher levels of supervision added at the discretion of a judge or probation or parole officer. In general, the conditions that a probationer or parolee faces are designed both to keep the public safe as well as to keep the former inmate on the straight and narrow (

Andrews, & Bonta, 1994, p. 48).

The word "probation" means testing of something, and probation can be seen as a period in which an individual is tested by being free yet being required to follow certain rules. If the probationer succeeds at the "test" of probation, then he or she is considered by the criminal justice system to be safe to return as a full member of society. Some of the conditions of probation are almost universally true: For example, essentially all probationers are forbidden to possess firearms or other weapons and many have curfews (Rhine & Paparozzi, 1999, p. 27).

Most individuals on probation or parole are not supposed to "associate" with other former inmates, and many are required not to use alcohol, even though alcohol may not in any way have been involved in their offense. However, since alcohol since to reduce inhibition and increase impulsivity, it can prove to be a dangerous habit for an offender. Not only alcohol but most illegal drugs can increase the chance that an individual will re-offend, so many probationers and parolees are required to submit to random drug tests.

Of course, probationers and parolees, like the rest of us, are not supposed to commit criminal acts. Testing positive for an illegal drug like methamphetamines would therefore not only be a violation of the conditions of an individual's parole but would also be an additional and separate crime, which could return an individual to jail or prison on the probation violation and might also results in a new charge and a new trial.

Probationers are often required to participate in certain types of programs meant to rehabilitate them, especially as there is less and less rehabilitation attempted in prison itself. These programs can include psychological counseling, drug and alcohol abuse education and prevention, anger management, domestic violence counseling, or parenting. All of these programs are designed to help improve public safety and to minimize the chance that the individual in question does no further harm to his or her victims and family (Smith & Dickey, 1998. P. 28).

Other conditions of parole or probation depend much more specifically on the nature of the offense for which the person served his or her time. Sex offenders, for example, may be forbidden to have pornography in their possession. If their victim was a minor, they may be forbidden to have any contact with any children. Individuals convicted of acts of domestic violence may have a restraining order that forbids his or her coming into contact with the victim. Many sex offenders as well as individuals convicted of other crimes such as domestic violence or drunk driving are now outfitted with electronic tracking units so that their whereabouts can be pinpointed at all times. An individual who is supposed to keep a certain distance from his victim, for example, or a sex offender who is forbidden to come within a certain number of feet of a school might well be fitted with such a monitor so that authorities can be alerted immediately if he or she is in a place that is not permitted under the conditions of probation (Corbett, Fitzgerald, & Jordan 1998).

Whether or not such conditions actually do keep the community any safer is an issue subject to a great deal of debate, and many individuals within the criminal justice community believe that the current system of tracking former inmates costs far more than it gives in return. The following parole official was quoted in a Department of Justice report that questioned the efficacy of probation programs:

[For some] people in probation and parole, there's a real fear about reaching out to the community, about bringing the community into their work -- because [they] feel powerless and defeated, not necessarily with their day-to-day work with offenders but admitting that what they're doing is not necessarily working, and I think they're embarrassed by their inability to bring about some real change and there's a fear of looking inadequate. (Department of Justice, 1998)

The report goes on to note that community members generally want the same things that probation officers and others criminal justice professionals want, and even in many ways what felons themselves want. The public's desires include the following:

1. To be safe from violent crime

2. For offenders to be held accountable for their past and present actions

3. For offenders to prepare the damage that they have done to the extent that this is possible

4. For offenders to get whatever treatment that makes them safe to be members of the community

5. For the public, including the victim(s) to be involved in the process of determining how probation should be organized.

However, while there is a high level of agreement about the basic contour that probation and parole should take, the public generally wants all of these things accomplished immediately while criminal justice professionals (along with former felons) know that such a process takes time.

Constitutional Challenges

The above description of parole and probation conditions and programs might seem perfectly reasonable, and indeed monitoring felons tends to be an idea that receives a lot of support from community members who are frightened about what these individuals may do once they are released back into the…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Probation And Parole Programs Individuals Who Are" (2011, March 30) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/probation-and-parole-programs-individuals-50278

"Probation And Parole Programs Individuals Who Are" 30 March 2011. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/probation-and-parole-programs-individuals-50278>

"Probation And Parole Programs Individuals Who Are", 30 March 2011, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/probation-and-parole-programs-individuals-50278

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Probation and Parole Supervision Probation and Parole

    Probation and Parole: Supervision Probation and parole agencies supervise offenders in the community. Once an offender has been granted probation or parole, a probation or parole officer is assigned to supervise the progress of that offender in the community. There is a conflict over the duty and specificities of supervision. To some, supervision is based upon the casework model where supervision forms the basis of a treatment program. In other words, the

  • Compare and Contrast Probation and Parole

    parole and probation encompass the re-integration of convicted criminals within their communities in a supervised, controlled, and humane manner. On their web site, the American Probation and Parole Organization describes probation and parole as "twins," as both programs encourage rehabilitation of offenders and are viable alternatives to imprisonment. Because American prisons are already dangerously overcrowded and increasingly more expensive to run, parole and probation offer financially feasible, effective, and

  • Probation and Parole

    probation and parole in the state of Pennsylvania. As in most states, probation and parole go hand-in-hand in Pennsylvania. The same agency, the Board of Probation and Parole (PBPP) oversees both agencies in the state, and they work together to ensure citizens' safety and well-being through the criminal justice system. They are an essential part of the criminal justice system, and an essential aspect of overall public safety. Definitions of

  • Recidivism Rates of Those on Probation or Parole

    Recidivism of Those on Parole Probation and Recidivism Recidivism can be referred to as the tendency of offenders getting back to crime after charges have been pressed against them or even while still serving their probation. It is categorized as a new crime that a felony inmate or a probationer commits (Merriam Webster, 2012). The basic way of measuring recidivism rate is through the frequency of re-arrests, reincarnations as well as the

  • Parole Some Might Describe America as Being

    Parole Some might describe America as being a nation of prisoners. There is no escaping the fact that our society produces many laws that result in many infractions of these laws which eventually result in many prisoners and court cases. The role of probation and the probation officer in this chaotic mess we call the justice system plays a pivotal role in the effectiveness of a communities approach on crime. The purpose

  • Probation Parole & Prison Privatization

    Parole reduces the financial strain on prison system in terms of costs of feeding and housing prisoners as well as overcrowding and the need to build more prisons. Parole sentences that require prisoners to volunteer involve prisoners in the local community and enable prisoners to 'pay' their debt to society and thus pay for their incarceration. Most probationers in the system are nonviolent: "three-quarters of probationers were supervised for a non-violent offense"

  • Punishment Program

    Punishment Program This punishment program is a middle ground between incarceration and traditional probation and parole. The individuals participating in this program are released into the community, however, they are subject to very strict guidelines and conditions; failure to meet the requirements leads to a jail term in one of the state's jails to serve their sentence. The punishment program is divided into three types; house arrest, day reporting and


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved