Program Evaluation From An External Assessment

From an internal perspective, the head of the Public Administration Department should be in charge of constructing and enforcing compliance protocols. The first step is to communicate with the external evaluator in order to construct an assessment of needs and requirements.

After the initial communication, the head of department can meet with top management to ensure that the protocol is acceptable in terms of the overall university standard. One this has been done, it should be communicated to the other personnel within the department, and finally to students.

As mentioned above, one example of the compliance protocol is academic honesty. All lecturers within the department should understand what plagiarism is, for example, as well as how to detect it and what disciplinary measures should be upheld when it is detected. Students should also be made aware very specifically of these protocols.

The...

...

Lecturers must maintain a professional relationship with students at all times, providing them with the best education possible to fulfill their duties as public administrators in the future.
To create a platform for these forms of compliance, it is suggested that a protocol of open communication be established within the department. The head of department and personnel should, for example, be able to communicate openly about the compliance protocols, while students should be made fully aware of their duties and rights during their time at the department. In this way, full compliance with academic standards and disciplines can be ensured, which will ultimately result in excellence when students enter the world of public administration as professionals themselves.

Cite this Document:

"Program Evaluation From An External" (2011, June 02) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/program-evaluation-from-an-external-42275

"Program Evaluation From An External" 02 June 2011. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/program-evaluation-from-an-external-42275>

"Program Evaluation From An External", 02 June 2011, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/program-evaluation-from-an-external-42275

Related Documents

C. Evaluation question(s) and aims. The primary question that will be addressed is to identify whether HCBS program is able to provide service to the target population. The evaluation questions will also be directed to the cost effectiveness of the program. The following evaluation questions are identified: 1. Is the program meet the budget requirements of the 1915 (b)? 2. Has the program generates cost saving? 3. Has the program has been able to

Program Evaluation The difference between action research and program evaluation might seem rather negligible on the surface, but a basic understanding of how action research differs from more traditional research methods also leads to great clarity in understanding the differences in evaluative methods. Action research is essentially a method of formative evaluation, where the evaluation is an ongoing process embedded in the experimental phases of the research; program evaluation is more

This data would entail two components, a survey completed by the nurses during the course, which asks for input as to whether anything in the curriculum seems outdated. The second component would be an annual audit and fact-check. Finally, the third component would be verifying how the curriculum falls in line with the hospital's master plan. Should the hospital change its overall strategies, those changes should be reflected in

In order to accomplish this task, the net cost per student will be calculated and compared to the desired outcomes of the program. In order to be beneficial and worthwhile, the benefits of the program must not dramatically outweigh the costs of the program. Cost:benefit analysis will help to determine if the program is beneficial enough to continue. Resources The cost: benefit analysis will help to determine if the expenditures for

However, each chapter does include a paragraph explaining the intended purpose and outcome of the study. This study was not a traditional academic study and did not follow a standard academic format. It followed specific departmental government guidelines and stated the purpose, as directed by the General Assembly. The key research objectives focused on discovering the strengths and weaknesses of ever program or process that was examined in the

Logic Model I would use a logic model. Logic models work with graphics and schematic models leading one to articulate clearly what one wants to achieve, what one's objectives are, and how to achieve them. Logic models also have diagrams that help one assess if th outcomes have been achieved and what results are, and what one still has to do to achieve one's objectives. There are many types of logic models.