Rater Errors In Performance Appraisal Thesis

Having managers justify their reviews to their superiors will give little quality control if the supervisors wish the reviews to have a predetermined positive or negative conclusion. Using pay-for-performance and performance reviews in general when the outcomes are foregone conclusions and shaped by rater needs to motivate employees, preserve workplace harmony, or conversely cut a department is both unjust to employees and fosters worker cynicism and resentment. While fears of lawsuits may be valid, having a paper trail of positive or negative assessments that contain known errors is unlikely to help the organization prosper in the long run and can create legal complications of its own. Employers must first ask if performance reviews can be meaningful in the organization, of if the work culture is better suited to team-based reviews, rather than individual reviews. Pay-for-performance strategies should only be used if supervisors have enough data about employees to make meaningful judgments....

...

And finally, if performance reviews are used, more than one individual should weigh in on the assessment, to minimize bias as much as possible

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Curtis, Ami B., Richard D. Harvey & Daran Ravden. (2005, February). Sources of political distortions in performance appraisals. Group & Organization Management, 30(1): 42-60.

Retrieved February 21, 2010 at http://www.buec.udel.edu/beckert/BUAD%20875%2009S/Pres%203%20article%20appraisal.pdf

Staudenmayer, N, M Tyre, L Perlow. (2002, September-October). Time to change:

enablers of organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5): 583-587.
89 (1)158 -- 164. Retrieved February 21, 2010 at http://www.tamu.edu/classes/psyc/payne/PA/Murphy%20et%20al.%202004.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Rater Errors In Performance Appraisal" (2010, February 21) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rater-errors-in-performance-appraisal-14855

"Rater Errors In Performance Appraisal" 21 February 2010. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rater-errors-in-performance-appraisal-14855>

"Rater Errors In Performance Appraisal", 21 February 2010, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rater-errors-in-performance-appraisal-14855

Related Documents
Performance Appraisals
PAGES 4 WORDS 1077

Performance Appraisals Jeffrey Spence's 2011 article "Conscious rating distortion in performance appraisal: a review, commentary, and proposal framework for research" discusses the relationship between managers and employees and how managers use conscious rating distortion as a means to evaluate individuals that they are in charge of. Performance appraisal is one of the principal topics that the paper relates to as the writer tests several theories with the purpose of determining the

However, as Murphy (2008) notes, these original scores, and the weightings, are given by biased humans who may have another agenda than simply giving the most accurate appraisal possible. In addition, there is also the question about whether a truly accurate (when negative) appraisal is the best course of action due to the possible negative consequences. Management by Objectives (MBO) Sudarsan (2009) surmises that, in the past, researchers have concluded that

performance feedback methods that seek to present employees with an opportunity to receive feedback (with regard to their performance) from not only their supervisors but also from customers, co-workers, and peers. One of the key advantages of this performance appraisal system has got to do with its ability to allow for full participation. It also gives a variety of perspectives with regard to the performance of an individual. It

Performance Management
PAGES 3 WORDS 949

performance management? Performance management is the company's goals equal the employee's activities and outputs. Defining performance, it specifies which aspects of employee's performance remain relevant to the business through job examination. Job examination or analysis means getting detailed data concerning jobs. Measuring performance involves measuring said aspects through performance evaluation. Performance evaluation is a method for managing performance. After evaluations, employees gain feedback and learn whether their performance has

The company leaders should however provide the training and development opportunities for their teams and make good on that commitment. The aspect of keeping commitments to employees, even when it is costly and hard to do in circumstances including the development of new performance management systems, is a necessary cost of consistency and leadership for higher performance (Castellano, Roehm, 2001). Once Angus and his team have been able to

According to Weiss and Kolberg, "In the 1960s, a breakthrough in sharing the assessment results came from the Peace Corps when the psychologists who were working with the volunteers used surveys that were geared to expand the volunteer's self-knowledge, under the assumption that expanding self-knowledge would help a volunteer better deal with culture change. This was the first time that this type of assessment was done for the primary benefit