Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The problem lies in the fact that NCLB is often used in a punitive fashion, even against schools that are making an effort and showing improvement. Without some humanization and an appeals process, the use of standardized testing can be a blunt instrument in the hands of legislators.
Questions about the unfairness of other standardized measurements and assessments such as the SAT are also rife because of the negative impact they can and have had on students' lives. Theoretically, the SAT is supposed to give colleges information about how students will perform in college, and flag students from easier schools with high GPAs who still struggle with basic skills. But there are questions about the fairness and accuracy of the SAT, despite many recent revisions, including the introduction of an essay portion. Women and African-Americans and members of other minority groups continue to show stronger undergraduate performances than would be predicted by their SAT scores, compared with their white male counterparts (SAT race, gender gaps increase, 2003, Fair Test). New revisions to the test have not substantially improved this (Schaeffer & Mermell 2008).
The way that the SAT makers grade the test for reliability "predictably, consistently, and reliably yields questions that favor whites dramatically over other subgroups...the explanation comes from the way that designers of the SAT -- and of many other standardized tests -- define reliability. A reliable question that is intended to be difficult, for instance, is one on which those who score highest overall consistently do well, and on which those with low scores consistently do poorly...Therefore, the highest achievers among test takers set the standard, and questions on which they do well look more statistically reliable than those on which they do poorly, even though some minority students may score higher on those questions" (Young 2003).
Given such questions about the validity of the SAT, more and more colleges are allowing prospective students to opt out of the SAT, and provide a graded paper instead as proof of the rigor of their coursework in high school and their ability to engage in critical thinking. Some students feel that using more qualitative means rather than quantitative means of assessing students decreases the chance of bias influencing the acceptance process, and that it allows more student control over the process of how he or she will be fairly assessed.
Even if the SAT becomes less important in the future and NCLB is reformed, it is unlikely that standardized assessment will ever completely end. However, benchmarks must be placed in a human context, and for students with alternative learning needs, standardized assessment may have less usefulness and value, given that these student's education often has a more idiosyncratic path. Regardless, at all levels where measurement plays a critical aspect of student placement, there must be a delicate balance between parental and student decision-making regarding the efficacy of such tests in painting a picture of their learning and the need to establish a benchmark or baseline of achievement
Moravcik, Meghan E. (2006, July 8). Horne sues education department. Arizona Republic.
Retrieved from Interversity on January 10, 2009 at http://www.interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Jul2006/msg00009.html
Multiple choice tests. (2009). Engineers for education. Retrieved on January 10, 2009 at http://www.engines4ed.org/hyperbook/nodes/NODE-66-pg.html
Problems with standardized tests Engineers for education. Retrieved on January 10, 2009 at http://www.engines4ed.org/hyperbook/nodes/NODE-69-pg.html
SAT race, gender gaps increase. (2003, October). Fair Test. Retrieved on January 10, 2009 at http://www.fairtest.org/sat-race-gender-gaps-increase
Schaeffer, Bob. (2006, July 7). Feds threaten most states with NCLB funding loss. AP Wire.
Retrieved from Interversity on January 10, 2009 at http://www.interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Jul2006/msg00011.html
Schaeffer, Robert & Jesse Mermell. (2008, June 17) FairTest reacts to the "New" SAT validity studies. Fair Test. Retrieved on January 10, 2009 at http://www.fairtest.org/fairtest-reacts-new-sat-validity-studies
Young, Jeffrey R. (2003, October 10). "Researchers Charge Racial Bias on the SAT."
The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved on January 10, 2009 at http://faculty.adams.edu/~tpmcneil/rcg/researchers_charge_bias_on_the_sats.pdf
"Self-Incriminating And Individuals Should Have" (2009, January 12) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-incriminating-and-individuals-should-25507
"Self-Incriminating And Individuals Should Have" 12 January 2009. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-incriminating-and-individuals-should-25507>
"Self-Incriminating And Individuals Should Have", 12 January 2009, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-incriminating-and-individuals-should-25507
Human Rights Should Australia Have a Bill of Rights? Back between 1992 and 1994 in Australia, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission together with the Australian National University (ANU) which was a center for Public Law made a publication that contained volumes of essays explaining the desirability for a Bill of Rights. The survey conducted by ANU reported that over 70% of the Australians where for a Bill of rights. 8%
Miranda Rights Should Be Available to Individuals Detained by Private Security Most people are familiar with so-called "Miranda Rights" that are named after the 1968 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona. Fewer people actually understand what those rights actually are or why they are important. Specifically, Miranda does not actually require police to "read rights" to suspects or prohibit them from questioning suspects and arrested persons. Instead, Miranda imposes a
Exclusionary Rule The Future of the Exclusionary Rule The first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, otherwise known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect citizens against abusive state power. These protections include preventing the government from entering and seizing property without just cause or stripping citizens of their rights without due process (Oaks 665). These protections are encoded within the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S.
Miranda Ruling: Its Past, Present and Future In almost all cases, the Miranda ruling of 1966 applies to police interviews with criminal suspects, although other Supreme Court decisions extend some of the rights to legal counsel and prevention of self-incrimination to public and private employers. According to the Supreme Court, the Miranda Warnings must be given prior to questioning to all persons who have been arrested and are in police
4. Identify what issues the judge would take into consideration when setting bond for John Judges consider a number of factors as well as issue prior to setting bail. These factors include but they are not limited to the severity of the offense committed, John's ties to the community, his criminal record as well the probability of his absconding. The fact that John does not have any prior arrests could work
Craig Price The story of Craig Price is tragic, violent and troubling. For these very reasons it is important to investigate this man's life and childhood in order to better understand the effects of juvenile delinquency and how they possibly related to his behavior. The purpose of this paper is to describe and postulate how Craig Price's violent behavior relates to theories of juvenile delinquency and how he developed into a
Miranda Rights Miranda THE PROS AND CONS OF THE MIRANDA RIGHTS Protection against self-incrimination is undoubtedly one of the most basic rights as described in the laws and codes of the American legal system. In the past, this right was often completely abridged, for those that were accused of a crime would be forced to confess their guilt through various forms of torture. But under American law, the protection against self-incrimination infers that