Whigs Vs. Democrats Slavery, Freedom, Crisis Union Essay

WHIGS vs. DEMOCRATS Slavery, Freedom, crisis Union 1840-1877 Democracy America: The Whigs Democrats Many Americans half nineteenth century a powerful federal government a threat individual liberty supported sovereignty state local government.

Slavery, freedom, and the crisis of the Union 1840-1877: Considering economic policies and the balance of power between national and local government, how did Whigs and Democrats differ in their definitions of American freedom and its relationship to government authority? Use two examples from both the Democrats and Whigs to support your claims.

Ever since the birth of America, two competing strains of thought ran through the American consciousness. The first was the Jeffersonian idea that the government which governed best, governed least and that a relatively weak central government was a facilitator of liberty. The contrasting Hamiltonian notion stressed that a strong federal government was required to protect individual liberties and the state as a whole. These tensions were later embodied in the clashing political positions of the Democrats and Whigs. The Democratic Party was created in the spirit of Jefferson and supported a weak federal government and states' rights, and became associated with the interests of the South (What's in a name, 2009). In contrast, "the Whigs started off as a coalition of those opposed...

...

Many southerners in the Whigs professed admiration for Jackson but were clearly uncomfortable with his latter policies on banking" (What's in a name, 2009). Jackson's destruction of the second federal bank of the United States (one of the founding concepts of Hamiltonian democracy) was keeping with his Jeffersonian principles and his advocacy of states' rights.
The Democrat's supporters were predominantly agrarian in nature, and perceived the federal government as representing the interests of the industrialized north. In contrast, the Whig Party supported what it saw as progress for the new nation in the form of industrialization. Although it would ultimately prove to be a fractious, difficult-to-unify coalition of interests, "Whig Party's platform of federal support for internal improvements such as roads and canals, protective tariffs, and a national bank....[demanded] a stronger national role in regional economic development" (Baker 2007). The Democrats viewed these policies as supporting a minority of 'big business,' industrial interests vs. The interests of the people. The Whigs criticized the populist Democrats for their corruption, and alleged that the use of a 'spoils system' often put into place by Democrats, in which only the party in power's political supporters were allowed…

Sources Used in Documents:

Cite this Document:

"Whigs Vs Democrats Slavery Freedom Crisis Union" (2012, June 24) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/whigs-vs-democrats-slavery-freedom-crisis-80849

"Whigs Vs Democrats Slavery Freedom Crisis Union" 24 June 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/whigs-vs-democrats-slavery-freedom-crisis-80849>

"Whigs Vs Democrats Slavery Freedom Crisis Union", 24 June 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/whigs-vs-democrats-slavery-freedom-crisis-80849

Related Documents

In 1837, Lincoln took highly controversial position that foreshadowed his future political path. He joined with five other legislators out of eighty-three to oppose a resolution condemning abolitionists. In 1838, he responded to the death of the Illinois abolitionist and newspaper editor, Elijah Parish Lovejoy, who was killed while defending his printing presses from a mob of pro-slavery citizens in Alton, Illinois. In a statesmanlike manner, Lincoln gave a cautious

So far, I have tried to made a short historical review of the first years of the existence of the Republican party, identifying a few ideological main trends that defined the activity and the platform of the party. Namely, I have talked about the anti-slavery position (proved, among others, by the importance given to the Northern branches), somehow moderate in order to keep the votes of the nativist Americans, who

American Civil War Causes.
PAGES 8 WORDS 2506

In many ways, the how of the evolution of the Civil War is a pseudo-chicken-and-egg question; which issue supported the other? Did the slave labor of the South spawn the abolition rampant throughout Union ideology or did the economics of one-sided success and agricultural threat pose a fundamental insecurity system? New Jersey highlighted the road in between. "Let the south be protected in all her rights but let the

Women and the Home Front in Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee during the Civil War This paper examines the living conditions and attitudes that shaped the lives of the women in western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee during and after the American Civil War. The thesis statement should deal with the breakdown of long standing ties between the people of the mountains as they chose to fight for the

Similarly, George Caleb Bingham depicts visually how American political campaigns shifted their focus from appealing mainly to an elite body of male voters toward pandering to the public. Bingham portrays a group of voters clamoring to be heard, marking changes in the ways American citizens viewed their role in the political process. Using lofty language, Daniel Webster writes a Second Reply to Robert Y. Hayne regarding the debate over states' rights

South Secede in 1861? Why did the South decide to secede from the Union? What were all the circumstances, political, social, economic and moral that led to the South's decision to slice the nation in half? This paper reviews those issues -- including all the political and economic issues leading up to the secession -- through the use of available scholarly literature. The South -- Just Prior to the Civil War