Suicide and Society
Suicide: An Individual Phenomenon or a Societal Construct?
Statistics show that suicide rates in the U.S. are highly predictable. It is annually expected each year that over 30,000 suicides will occur, as compared to about 17,000 homicides. This stable and predictable estimate of suicide rate stems from a precise analysis of social factors describing four separate categories of suicidal influences: egoistic, altruistic, anomic, and fatalistic. According to the functionalist theory described by Emile Durkheim, rates are social facts based on other established social facts, and thus have a sociological basis. As suicide rates are social facts, Durkheim set out to provide an empirical basis of social explanation regarding suicide, providing a far different account of trends than the previously perceived notion that suicide is based purely on individual or psychological reasons. Thus, the phenomenon of what actually motivates the occurrence of suicide can be examined from a social perspective, implicating society as a factor in stimulating an individual to commit suicide.
Theoretical Perspective
As Henslin explains in Down to Earth Sociology, the study of sociology proposes several different events. He explains, societies structure and nuances are interrelated, society is dynamic and defined in history, and individuals can flourish in society through a system of selection. Thus, sociologists like Durkheim study the dynamics of society to account for historical and social justifications, finding relevance in social outcomes. In the case of suicide, Durkheim defines it as, "all cases of death resulting directly of indirectly from a positive or negative act of the victim himself, which he knows will produce this result," excluding accidental deaths from this scenario. Upon Durkheim's functionalist analysis of suicide rates, factoring in demographics, he accounted for distinct trends in the consistency of the rates, noting a series of social sets implying a collective tendency toward the results. He narrowed his theory on societal...
Lack of or excesses in social integration and normative integration (moral value) can affect these norms. Among the suicidal categories, the functionalist theory considers egoistic and altruistic forms of suicide to be related to changes in social integration, while anomic and fatalistic categories of suicide involve affected normative integration.
Analysis
Egoistic suicide occurs as a result of a lack of social integration, where these individuals are less bound by social norms and values, which allows greater freedom of thought and thus more deviant behavior, such as academic failure and crime. Age appears to be relevant as peaks in this category are seen in adolescents and the elderly. Social isolates also pertain to the egoistic group, as they do not benefit from social support or guidance. Another interesting group discerned in egoistic suicides is unmarried men where the stable influence of marriage and its stress of social norms and goals are not present. The opposite case of altruistic suicide also involves the impact of social cues.
Altruistic suicide is the reverse situation, resulting from an excess of social integration. For instance, members of gangs, the military, and groups like Al Quaeda pertain to this group because of the extreme social bond they have to their alliance. These individuals tend to become so committed to their group that they lose an individual perspective and thus overvalue the norms of their group. This results in their willingness to sacrifice their own life for the benefit of the group. Suicide rates pertaining to altruistic behavior are also increased among people in Japan, India, and preliterate societies. Normative or moral integration, such as anomie and fatalism, also defines groups prone to increased occurrences of suicide.
Anomie is defined as the state of…
