Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Plato's Crito And The Law
Among the celebrated treatises on reason and logic known as the dialogues of Plato, it is the relatively short discourse between and the condemned philosopher Socrates his concerned companion Crito which today stands as the most lasting monument to the ancient Greek tradition of pedagogically examining the realm of ethics. The Crito is an artfully constructed depiction of an intensely logical dialectic between the sober and systematic Socrates, who has refuses to defy his impending death sentence as an extension of his conception of justice and injustice, and a wealthy patron willing to finance an attempt at escape. After allowing his friend Crito to present a series of arguments, which include the provision of financing for the flight to freedom and several provocative moral appeals, Socrates responds by reaffirming his commitment to remaining guided by reason. Socrates' subsequent defense of his own imminent execution is based on a fundamental belief in the objectively opposing forces known as justice and injustice,...
Socrates considered the ancestral oath of the Ephebes, which bound young Athenian men to "pay thoughtful heed to whoever may be in authority over me, and to the established laws and to whatever laws may be established in the future" (Komorowska, 2011), to be a consecration of his own honor, and by refusing to allow his present condition of captivity and condemnation to alter his existing moral precepts regarding a citizen's obligation to the law, he proved to be a man of immense personal principle.
Plato presents Socrates discussion with Crito as a calm and reasoned exchange, and this rhetorical device is designed to deemphasize the looming threat of forcible poisoning so that the reader may draw clear conclusions on the basis of the factual evidence presented. Socrates' series of assertions made to rebut Crito's claims, which scholars have since classified as…
Works Cited
Komorowska, Joanna. "Examina Antiqua." Examina Antiqua. 1.2 (2011): 169-182. Web. 24 Oct.
2012. <http://peitho.amu.edu.pl/volume2/komorowska.pdf>.
Plato. "Crito." Classics of Moral and Political Theory. Michael L. Morgan. 5th. Indianapolis, IN:
Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2011. 64-71. Print.
Socrates In Plato's Crito, Socrates engages the title character in a dialogue about the nature of law, justice, and ethics. Crito wants to break Socrates out from prison, making various arguments in favor of the escape. For one, Crito tells Socrates that it is not ethical to abandon his children if he can help it. Second, Crito repeatedly refers to his own honor and ego, not wanting to be viewed as
As a result, Plato is demonstrating social disobedience, by highlighting how anyone who questions authority will face a similar fate as Socrates. (Plato, 2007) In Crito, Socrates has been found guilty of his crimes and is awaiting his death sentence in an Athenian prison cell. On an early morning, his friend Crito pays him a visit and offers to help him escape. He feels that if Socrates is able to
Ethics in Law Enforcement Every individual dreams of living an ideal life filled with peace, prosperity, love and comforts. Many a time's people get money but no peace of mind and often they have incomparable mental solace without the wealth. Scholars like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates believed that an ideal life did not exist but a successful; peace filled life was only possible with adherence to ethics or moral principles of
Just, Unjust and Laws of Conscience Just a half a century ago, interracial marriage was still illegal in some states, and it has only been recently that same-sex marriages have been legalized across the country and cannabis has been decriminalized or legalized in more than half of the states. This trends mean that laws that were once widely regarded as just at one point in time become unjust as social views
In the Crito, Socrates discusses the differentiation between the injustice of laws and human beings, and his ability to still obey the law despite flawed human action (Rafferty, 2001). "But, Socrates, obey us, your nurturers, and do not regard children or living or anything else as more important than justice...If you depart now, you will depart having been done injustice not by us laws, but by human beings" (54b-c) Even though
Natural Law In Apology Crito, Plato presents Socrates a staunch defender law, sense respect legal orders polity a basic obligation citizenship. What important reasons Socrates position defense Athenian law? If accept Lewis' critique emotional subjectivism (Gaius Titus' position) Abolition Man sound, interpret Socrates' actions result subjective feelings. Plato's "Apology" and "Crito" and C.S. Lewis' concept of Natural Law: Where both pagan and Christian philosophies meet in agreement One of the most striking actions in