The Trial of Socrates
The Athenians suffered a crushing defeat in 404 B.C.E. with the end of the Peloponnesian War. A Spartan occupation force controlled the city, and instituted the rule of the Thirty Tyrants to replace Athenian democracy. While a form of democracy was reinstated it lacked the acceptance of ideas and freedom of speech that had been such an integral part of Athenian society (Rogers).
In Athens at this time it was the practice of private citizens to bring accusations of unlawful behavior to the attention of government officials. In 399 B.C.E. Socrates was charged with impiety by Meletus, a poet. Laws against impiety were wide-ranging so the charges had to be specified. The indictment against him reads "Socrates is guilty of refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state and introducing other, new divinities. He is also guilty of corrupting the youth. The penalty demanded is death" (Mahan).
The King Archon determined that the accusations against Socrates were lawful and had enough worth to justify a jury trial. The charges were adjudicated by a sworn jury drawn by lot. The law did not stipulate the penalty for impiety; it was up to the person bringing the case to the court to propose the punishment. If a guilty verdict was found it was up to the defendant to propose a counter penalty, and the jury to determine between the two. The trial began in the morning and had to be completed by the end of the day. The accusers and the accused spoke for themselves (Mahan).
Plato, a pupil of Socrates, wrote an account of Socrates' trial, called Apologia Socratous or Apology of Socrates, apologia meaning defense. In his defense Socrates asserts that the charges being brought upon him were motivated by his practice of teaching young men to question the authority and wisdom of the establishment. In reply to the question of shame for having been brought to trial to defend his sin against God by condemning me" (Rogers).
The jury found Socrates guilty by a margin of 30 votes. During the penalty phase of the trail Socrates argued that his sentence should be free meals for the remainder of his life at the Prytaneum, the hall where the members of the Prytaneis, foreign ambassadors, victorious generals, and Olympic athletes dined. He then proposed to pay a fine equivalent to eight and a half years wages. In response the jury voted him to death by a margin of votes greater than had voted him guilty. Socrates' punishment was postponed for a month to observe the annual religious mission of sending a ship to Delos (Mahan).
While in prison awaiting his execution Socrates is visited by Crito who has made arrangements for him to escape from prison and to the safety of exile. Crito argued that Socrates' death will reflect badly on his friends: people will think they made no attempt to save him. Furthermore, there were arrangements for him to live comfortably in exile. Crito also argued if Socrates stayed he would be helping his enemies in wronging him unjustly and therefore would be acting unjustly himself. He also pointed out that he would be abandoning his sons and leaving them without a father (Plato).
Socrates counters one should only concern themselves with acting well and not worry about public opinion. The only concern is if it is just for him to escape. Socrates argues the Laws of Athens and to break one would be to break them all. The citizen is bound to the law as a child is bound to his parent, and rather than escape he should try to persuade the laws to let him go. Since he is a citizen of Athens and has lived there happily all his life, he is has a duty to them in the form of a social contract. If he…
As a result, Plato is demonstrating social disobedience, by highlighting how anyone who questions authority will face a similar fate as Socrates. (Plato, 2007) In Crito, Socrates has been found guilty of his crimes and is awaiting his death sentence in an Athenian prison cell. On an early morning, his friend Crito pays him a visit and offers to help him escape. He feels that if Socrates is able to
Just, Unjust and Laws of Conscience Just a half a century ago, interracial marriage was still illegal in some states, and it has only been recently that same-sex marriages have been legalized across the country and cannabis has been decriminalized or legalized in more than half of the states. This trends mean that laws that were once widely regarded as just at one point in time become unjust as social views
If somebody has been accused of something that is punishable whether civilly or criminally, he will do everything just to be able to surpass the trial, even resorting to escape. Concerning the value of the law, Socrates has shown his strong standpoint about respect to its decisions. For him, if one has the ability to choose whether to obey a law, then it is a way of destroying the power