Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
69).
For O'Brien there is no moral or rectitude in a war story because even what is good and beautiful in it comes from an obscene and evil motive. It is impossible, in a true war story, for a soldier to die declaring that he is glad to have died for his country, as does happen in We Were Soldiers. In a true war story no one is glad to die, neither for their country nor for their comrades; in a true war story people die because they are afraid of being called cowards. We Were Soldiers screams that war is hell, but Kiley, much more eloquently declares, that war is the retaliatory death by torture of a baby water buffalo.
We Were Soldiers could not be obscene or rooted in evil because no sensible American audience would have accepted it then. Sensible Americans like things that feel good and the obscenity and evil of a true war story shames and embarrasses. We Were Soldiers, in order to appeal to that audience, had to connect to it through national pride and the uplifting victory at the movie's end. In an O'Brien war story there is no national...
In an O'Brien war story there is no victory, only survival and even that is dubious.
Sometime early in the 90s, perhaps during the filming of Braveheart, it seems that Mel Gibson developed this tried-and-true, red-and-blue nationalism and felt, thereafter, compelled to reproduce the Braveheart story in as many American-centric permutations as possible. His flagship movie of the time was entitled the Patriot, even. We Were Soldiers continues this trend of be-proud-of-American-military-heritage, and so could never be true. Gibson's image of war as a proud and difficult thing could not be farther from that of O'Brien, one of the Vietnam War's most eloquent survivors. It is likely that, too O'Brien at least, Gibson too is just another "dumb cooze."
Bibliography
1. O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York: Random House, 1990. Print.
2. SparkNotes Editors. "SparkNote on the Things They Carried." SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. 2002. Web. 6 May 2010.
Bibliography
1. O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York: Random House, 1990. Print.
2. SparkNotes Editors. "SparkNote on the Things They Carried." SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. 2002. Web. 6 May 2010.
The Negro SoldierWatching \\\"The Negro Soldier\\\" against the backdrop of World War II was a profound experience for me. The film, I thought, tried to bridge the gap between the racial divides that have troubled this nation for many long years. It was nice that it showed the valor, fortitude, dedication, and sacrifices of black soldiers. It was good to see that we too are an integral part of this
soldier in today's army. Specifically, it will define what a soldier is, with an ideal target audience of college-age readers. The news media seems to show soldiers in fighting regalia, always at the ready for a skirmish or a war. While this media ideal is certainly part of the soldier's life, it is not the only thing soldiers do each day - a soldier is much more complex that
soldiers who fought in World War II and Vietnam. The writer illustrates many of the differences as well as similarities in the two war soldiers and uses movies and book sot underscore the point. There were four sources used to complete this paper. The life of soldiers during times of combat has often been compared. It seems that many people believe all experiences of war are identical and if a
When describing the incompetence of the Iraqis, Finkel chooses to cite the barrage of questions that occur in the mind of a typical soldier. For example, when the Iraqi security forces allow an EFP to explode that was clearly within their range of vision, Finkel rhetorically lists the queries likely to pop into a troop's mind: "Did they know the EFP [explosive formed penetrator] was there but not say anything
Another Website ("Historical Inaccuracies in Film") points out the same thing, that the final battle scene with Lt. Col. Moore leading the brave charge at the North Vietnamese headquarters did not take place in reality or in the book. There was no helicopter coming to the aid of Moore's assault. In fact the 7th Air Cavalry division was given an airlift out of the area and the next day a
John Steinbeck, why soldiers won't talk. "Why soldiers won't talk:" John Steinbeck's imaginative essay on the psychological impact of war One of the most interesting aspects of John Steinbeck's essay "Why Soldiers Won't Talk" is the way in which he subtly shifts from the first person to the second person in the essay. He begins the essay stating that he himself is not a soldier: "During the years between the last war and