Steinbeck's Okies: Three Critical Perspectives Term Paper

" Each of our three critics has the "Okies" under the microscopic; but they employ three different lenses to examine their subjects. As we move from Reed to Owens to Gladstein, the calibration of the microscope moves steadily away. The movement starts with a narrow aperture, and "zooms out" to encompass a universal perspective: the "Okies" however, remain solidly in the center of our lens' field of vision. Points

John R. Reed, in his article "The Grapes of Wrath and the Esthetics of Indigence" close scrutiny of life & language of the migrants.

A reveals their dignity focus firmly on them, no need for archetypal / biblical interpretation

Louis Owens, in his article "The American Joads," widens the lens of perspective symbolic of the entire...

...

expansion centrality of bible to Steinbeck's vision
Mimi Reisel Gladstein, in her article, "The Grapes of Wrath: Steinbeck and the Eternal Immigrant," goes one further and backs the lens off even more

Okies as a universal metaphor for immigrant workers throughout the world

Gladstein's immigrant background - her reading reflects her own experience she employs sociological terms like "ethnophaulism" her examination of language contrasts to Reed's examination of language summing up 3 lens visions and "living" characters common belief in "affirming message" in novel as a whole conclusion - 3 views - uplifting message

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. "The Grapes of Wrath: Steinbeck and the Eternal Immigrant.." The Grapes of Wrath: Text and Criticism. Ed. Peter Lisca and Kevin Hearle. New York, NY: Penguin, 1997. 682-692.

Owens, Louis. "The American Joads." The Grapes of Wrath: Text and Criticism. Ed. Peter Lisca and Kevin Hearle. New York, NY: Penguin, 1997. 644-653.

Reed, John, R. "The Grapes of Wrath and the Esthetics of Indigence."

The Grapes of Wrath: Text and Criticism. Ed. Peter Lisca and Kevin Hearle. New York, NY: Penguin, 1997. 604-615.


Cite this Document:

"Steinbeck's Okies Three Critical Perspectives" (2005, November 11) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/steinbeck-okies-three-critical-perspectives-70402

"Steinbeck's Okies Three Critical Perspectives" 11 November 2005. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/steinbeck-okies-three-critical-perspectives-70402>

"Steinbeck's Okies Three Critical Perspectives", 11 November 2005, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/steinbeck-okies-three-critical-perspectives-70402

Related Documents

Finally, redemption is possible and is achieved by some: when Hester, Pearl and Dimmesdale all stand on the public scaffold, Dimmesdale falls fatally ill and Pearl kisses him, the spell of sinfulness is broken for them (Hawthorne 175), while Chillingworth "positively withered up, shrivelled away and almost vanished from mortal sight" because his plan to destroy Dimmesdale were simultaneously broken (Hawthorne 175). In sum, Puritan religious views are highly

As one writer says, not reading this novel "…deprives individuals and communities of the opportunity to respond to an ethical imperative insisting on virtuous treatment of our fellow human beings" (George, 83). This is a tremendous summation of fundamentally what Steinbeck is trying to achieve with a novel like of Mice and Men, and a notion which sums up most likely Steinbeck's strongest motivation for writing the novel. However, as one

In the end of the book Rosasharn agrees and goes to him. In the film version there is no flood, Rosasharn does not give birth, and the baby does not die. When Tom leaves at the end, his speech to Ma about fighting injustice seems almost victorious, as though Tom were a hero instead of a victim. After he leaves, Ma and Pa get in their old truck and head

She describes the transcendental experience of a starry night: "Every pointed star gets driven into your body. It's like that. Hot and sharp and -- lovely" (p. 345) It is a moment that shows the close connection of the painful and the sublime for Elisa, a connection that she understands perhaps because the brutal and tender nature of gardening. The most profound contradiction in the story comes at the end,

Steinbeck the Pearl
PAGES 6 WORDS 1534

Pearl, by John Steinbeck, has been noted as one of the most highly regarded novels in United States since World War II. Its appealing characters and obvious allegory have helped to make it a mainstay in American literature. A parable is a short work, usually fictitious, that illustrates a lesson, often on the subject of good and evil and the novel reads like a one; rich in religious overtones of

I. Introduction A. Elisa Allen is the protagonist of John Steinbeck’s short story “The Chrysanthemums.” Louise Mallard is the protagonist of Kate Chopin’s “The Story of An Hour.” B. Both Elisa and Louise are products of their social and historical contexts, particularly when it comes to gender norms. C. Elisa and Louise are passive protagonists, because patriarchy has stripped them of political agency. Thesis: By creating passive protagonists in their respective short stories, Steinbeck