Stereotypes in Social Psychology Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Stereotyping Inevitable: An Investigation of How People Use and Maintain Stereotypes, and How They Can Be Changed

Social psychology by nature deals with the examination of social phenomena including stereotyping. The intent of this paper is a close review of the nature of stereotyping, in order to determine whether stereotyping is inevitable and to determine whether or not social stereotypes can be changed. In particular stereotyping will be examined to determine whether or not people have an unconscious tendency to create perceptions of others, and what if anything can be done to change this unconscious pattern of thinking. The effects of stereotyping on members of groups will also be discussed and analyzed.

Analysis of Problem

Before one can examine the question of stereotyping, they must first understand exactly what stereotypes are. Stereotypes can be defined in a number of ways; most simply stereotypes are a set view or image of the members of a group or culture or generalizations one makes about strangers or certain members of a group based on limited knowledge of that groups beliefs, culture etc. (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2004).

It is important to note that not all stereotypes are considered negative, but many are misleading and too general and inflexible to offer an accurate assessment of a group or members of a group. Even if a stereotype is considered positive, it allows misconceptions of a particular person or groups of people, and any assumptions or misperceptions of a particular group can be harmful or damaging over time.

Most social psychologists agree that stereotyping is overall negative because it is harmful to human relational processes. It often leads to false beliefs and assumptions about other groups.

Social psychologists have long noted that stereotypes are traditionally formed when members or participants in a particular group, which they identify with, view other people who are not part of the group in terms of stereotypes (Kenrick & Simpson, 1997; Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2004). According to some researchers, people automatically assign stereotypes to other people based on the ways they view them, thus stereotyping occurs whether or not a conscious effort is taken to acknowledge or disregard the preconceptions one has formed about a particular person or group of people (Devine, 1989; Kenrick & Simpson, 1997).

People have a tendency to view individuals as alike and different when they are not members of our immediate group that is familiar and considered the norm (Anthony, Copper & Mullen, 1992). People who are considered members of our 'in groups' that is the people we are most likely to associate with, we are less likely to stereotype and recognize that each person is an individual possessed of unique traits and characteristics (Kenrick & Simpson, 1997).

Most people attribute differences that are evident in people who are not members of our immediate social circle as negative, thus negative stereotypes and labels are often formed to identify these characteristics and categorize them (Kenrick & Simpson, 1997).

Stereotypes may be inevitable if they are in fact truly created on a subconscious level. If as Kenrick & Simpson suggest, people have a natural tendency to form preconceptions about a certain group of people based on little knowledge of that groups actual morals, behaviors, cultural tendencies and behaviors, it is very possible that stereotypes will continue to exist for all time.

Fortunately however social psychology lends itself to the belief that people can change, thus one must believe that the tendency to form stereotypical beliefs about a certain group or culture can be altered with a conscious effort on the part of the group that is judging others.

Stereotypes are maintained when people have fears and make assumptions about other members of groups without knowing anything about them. It is natural for humans to be mistrusting of members of a group that are not similar to their own; for example, people from one culture might be more likely to distrust members of another culture automatically, whether it be because they look different, act in different ways or partake in different day-to-day actions and activities (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2004).

It is possible however to break the cycle of stereotyping by training individuals to be more open minded about people from different cultures, backgrounds, belief systems etc. The first step toward breaking down the cycle of stereotyping people is learning to identify what stereotypes one uses to begin with.

One cause of stereotyping is the belief that all members of a group outside of one's own group are the 'same' meaning they are not possessed of unique talents, skills, abilities or other traits that distinguish them from one another. When one holds stereotypical beliefs about another person or group of people, they believe that all members of that group are the same. This contradicts normal logic, which would dictate that all people are in fact different. As Kenrick & Simpson (1997) point out, people who stereotype still believe and acknowledge that they are unique and that members of their group are unique. The key to changing stereotypical behaviors then, will be helping people who stereotype recognize that members of other groups are also individuals, and must be treated as such. This will help break the unconscious association one has that a group of people is alike based on false premises.

Another key to changing stereotypical behavior is making the public aware of false stereotypes when they exist. Take for example, the recent terrorist activities that have befallen the nation. At the time the attacks on the World Trade Center occurred, out of fear and distrust many people may have automatically assumed that any 'outsider' or individual who was an Arab was automatically dangerous or had 'terrorist' tendencies. While stating this seems ridiculous, in all reality many people leap to similar conclusions when faced with situations that are unfamiliar and threatening.

Changing behavior such as this will require that people become more aware of the tendency to 'type' certain people based on the actions of a few. Not all beggars on the street for example, should be considered uneducated, poor and subject to substance abuse behaviors. However, stop any one person on the road and ask them to characterize the typical person who might beg for money or be homeless, and they will probably describe someone that fits the above description. These ideas aren't often based on personal experiences with an individual, but rather assumptions that are made as a result of a variety of factors.

For attitudes to change and for the tendency of people to leap to conclusions about another's habits and behaviors to change, the public must first become aware of the natural tendency humans have to judge others and make assumptions about their natural tendencies and deficits. Recognition of one's own prejudices and fears will also enable an individual to understand under what circumstances they would be more likely to judge someone else and make false assumptions about their attitudes and beliefs.


Stereotypes have existed since the dawn of time. Since man was first able to become a member of a group or society, man has had a tendency to conjure negative associations of people that were 'outsiders' or not members of their own society. Social psychologists have suggested that man's tendency to judge members of groups that are different from ones own is unconscious. This would lead one to believe that stereotyping is behavior that is inevitable. One cannot argue that stereotyping has existed for many years. Simply examining ones own prejudices will probably reveal numerous stereotypical beliefs about members of certain groups.

There is however much hope that the cycle of stereotyping can be broken. There are several steps one can take to reduce the likelihood that they will stereotype others, at least in a negative fashion. From a social…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Stereotypes In Social Psychology" (2005, March 12) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from

"Stereotypes In Social Psychology" 12 March 2005. Web.9 December. 2016. <>

"Stereotypes In Social Psychology", 12 March 2005, Accessed.9 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Social Psychology Bringing it All Together

    Social psychology is a very broad field that takes in the many varieties of group dynamics, perceptions and interactions. Its origins date back to the late-19th Century, but it really became a major field during and after the Second World War, in order to explain phenomena like aggression, obedience, stereotypes, mass propaganda, conformity, and attribution of positive or negative characteristics to other groups. Among the most famous social psychological studies

  • Social Psychology Social Beliefs and

    I have had friends that I've known since I was in grade school. Our initial interaction occurred because of our attraction toward one another. We had so many things in common, such as the same favorite television shows and the same favorite sports. Our proximity to one another also aided in the development of this attraction toward one another. We all lived on the same block and therefore had

  • Social Psychology View What Ensures That Women

    Social psychology view: What ensures that women are treated fairly in office settings in the United States? One of the most prudent applications of social psychology within contemporary settings are those that relate to gender. Gender issues can become exacerbated when they are viewed within particular social constructs, such as the work environment. Due to the fact that the majority of the world was initially a patriarchal society (particularly in the

  • Social Psychology Is the Study

    Looking at a problem from several different angles and viewpoints is the ultimate goal of group work and group decision-making. Having people who are different from one another helps to avoid 'groupthink' and contributes to in-depth discussions and better ideas than could be found in a group where the participants were basically all alike (Chartrand, van Baaren, & Bargh, 2006). How a person reacts to others and to the situation,

  • Social Psychology 2nd Morality and Group Relations

    Social Psychology 2nd Morality and Group Relations: Possible Bias The article entitled "Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members" as written by Brambilla et al. is comprised of three different research studies. However, each of these studies explores different facets of the same phenomena: how morality within and outside of groups varies by type of threat, and what sort

  • Social Psychology Principles in Shrek

    A person in a state of cognitive dissonance will strive to look for ways of reducing the dissonance he or she is feeling since it is uncomfortable. Reducing cognitive dissonance may entail a change in behavior, modification of perceptions, or addition of a cognition that is consistent with a person's behavior. Cognitive dissonance is demonstrated in the movie Shrek in the scene where we see Shrek struggle with his feelings

  • Social Psychology

    Social Psychology Social Biases Social bias is a concept which should need no explanation, however, unfortunately, that is not the case. In this society, instances of social bias are insidious and all pervasive. They are represented by prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Also unfortunate, is the fact that social bias is not always obvious because it can manifest in either subtle or blatant form. Furthermore, though not always apparent, individual lives are continuously

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved