Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Strategic Direction of Apple in the Enterprise
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) has emerged as one of the most profitable and prolific companies in the world, generating a market capitalization rate of $623B as of this writing in late August, 2012, delivering $148B in Revenues in their latest fiscal year and $40B in Net Income (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). One of Apple's greatest strengths is its ability to quickly translate innovative product concepts and designs into state-of-the-art products that deliver exceptional customer experiences. Apple has honed this through decades of disciplined execution and a continual focus on creating a highly synchronized supply chain, highly collaborative product design and development workflows, and the ability to take concepts to completed products in a fraction of the time of their competitors (Murray, Goode, Muro, 2010). Apple is credited with creating the smartphone market, tablet PC, cloud-based music buying and delivery service (iTunes), centralized document and image storage (iCloud) and more innovations in operating systems in the last five years than Microsoft (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). All of these accomplishments taken together have led to Apple creating a catalyst of growth in the tablet PC market, fueling a 100%+ increase in iPad sales (13% year over year) and iPhone sales that have increased 152% over the last eighteen months as well (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). Apple continues to accelerate the sales of their iPad, iPhone, iTouch devices in addition to its mainstream laptops and systems. Apple is able to accomplish these significant results by concentrating on the execution of its value chain, a decades-only concept that Dr. Michael Porter originally created to illustrate how the functional departments of a company all must be synchronized to deliver profitability (Porter, 2008). Apple's value chain is exceptionally effective in managing the coordinating of supply chain, sourcing, quality management, production, product design, marketing services, logistics and retailing operations. As long as two decades ago Apple had been concentrating on how to create this level of synchronization across their entire enterprise (Larson, 1994).
As the business model of Apple has continually become more complex, the ability of the organization to stay agile and quick to respond has increasingly become more difficult. This is a common problem companies have as they grow in size and complexity of their business models. For Apple, the environmental factors in the areas of economic, social, technological and political change have challenged their ability to grow, and also forced them to create a more market-driven organizational structure, abandoning the highly successful product divisions of the 1990s and early 2000 timeframe (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). The intent of this analysis is to evaluate how Apple is managing to continually grow despite economic, social, technological and political environmental forces impacting their business. In addition, an analysis of their market environment, response to the turbulent economic environment they operate in, the nature of their product strategies, an assessment of their strategic direction and strategic options are all included in this analysis. A separate section is included for each of these areas throughout the analysis. The Porter Fives Forces Model is used for analyzing these market dynamics (Porter, 2008).
Analysis of the Market Environment
Apple's ability to manage the many turbulent factors in the each of the areas of economic, social, technological and political change globally illustrates what can be accomplished when an organization creates an organization focused on agility of each customer-facing and production process. Apple has long been known for its ability to create products and services that excel on the dimension of user experiences (Larson, 1994). Many companies have been able to create a single product or even a product line that excels on this dimension of user experience. Yet it took decades of integration, process improvement and system and strategy development to translate this ability to take highly innovative, customer-driven products and quickly be able to translate them from concept to reality in record time (Fleischer, 2006). Apple has relied on the accuracy and speed of their new product development process to fuel top-line revenue growth while successfully entering entirely new geographic and product-based market segments (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). This accuracy and speed of innovation is a shock absorber the company relied on regularly to overcome the bumps that chaotic change in economic, social, technological and political areas bring to the company. Apple has succeeded at integrating the customer into every critical selling and service process that their role in absorbing economic shock is indistinguishable from the company itself (Chang, Weng, 2012). Apple absorbs economic shock better than any high tech company today due to how closely they are aligned with their customers' needs, wants and are highly effective in surpassing their expectations as well. This gives Apple an uplift in terms of its brand value as well, allowing the company to quickly move into entirely new markets not considered before (Hsiao, Tsai, Shen, Yeh, 2011).
The second and third environmental factors, social and technological are two areas that Apple has been able to harness and use the chaotic nature of for its advantage. Beginning with the social aspects of change, Apple has continually had a brand specifically designed for the nonconformist, the person out to change the world, much like tis founder Steve Jobs was (Hsiao, Tsai, Shen, Yeh, 2011). Apple was prescient in this area of their branding strategy, as social media specifically and the Internet in general has re-ordering the politics of enterprise spending on information technologies and their use (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). The pace of technological change is increasing as well, and Apple has been one of the primary catalysts of the revolution occurring in this area. When the first iPhones were under consideration for development, Apple executives started design sessions by saying how much they hated their existing cell phones and deliberately set out to revolutionize the industry based on how much they hated how difficult the devices were to use (Murray, Goode, Muro, 2010). The result was the iPhone product lien and the development of the smartphone industry (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). Why Apple succeeded in being a disruptive force in the smartphone and alter, tablet PC market can be traced back to hwo the company views technological change in the environment. Their executive management and most senior engineering teams see technological change as an opportunity to disrupt long-standing markets with highly innovative, state-of-the-art products (Chang, Weng, 2012). Apple also realized that with the rapid adoption of social media and the pervasive nature of the Internet, the best strategy to compete would be to focus on the operating system first (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). Using their Apple iOS operating system as the foundation for it assault against the chaotic change in the social and technological areas of its market, Apple emerged with one of the leading mobile device operating systems globally. Figure 1, Comparing Global Mobile Operating System Market Shares, 2011 shows the distribution of sales by device as of last year, as shown in one of the filings by Apple with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Apple Investor Relations, 2012).
Figure 1: Comparing Global Mobile Operating System Market Shares, 2011
(Apple Investor Relations, 2012)
Apple chose to address the challenges brought about by the chaotic nature of social and technological change by concentrating on what it does best, building software, systems and products that exceed customer expectations with exceptional experiences. In doing this, the senior management teams at Apple has to navigate between the expectations and needs of their long-standing, decades-old customer base on the one hand and the emerging class of customers who are purchasing the iPad, iPhone and iTouch in literally millions of units a month (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). The greater the social and technological change and its chaotic nature, the greater the tension between serving both of these groups of customers. Figure 2, Persona of Apple Customers, shows the attributes of the Apple customer base. There are the customers who have been purchasing products from the company for decades, and they are a strong component of the customer base, influencing product design (Fleischer, 2006). To be successful Apple has had to balance these two potentially divergent groups while also launching new products.
Figure 2: Persona of Apple Customers
Sources: (Apple Investor Relations, 2012) (Chang, Weng, 2012) (Hsiao, Tsai, Shen, Yeh, 2011) (Murray, Goode, Muro, 2010)
Political change has not been as severe for Apple as it has been for its suppliers, many of which are located in countries going through tumultuous changes in their governments. China is the location of many of Apple's most strategic suppliers, an the continual change there in terms of government control of production relative to emerging free market segments of their economy is costing Apple millions of dollars a year in advising and government relations efforts (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). Apple is also especially vigorous in protecting its patents and brands globally, which also has been extremely costly for the company as well (Apple Investor Relations, 2012).
Apple's Response to a Turbulent Global Environment
The Five Forces Model…[continue]
"Strategic Direction Of Apple In The Enterprise" (2012, August 24) Retrieved October 27, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/strategic-direction-of-apple-in-the-enterprise-81768
"Strategic Direction Of Apple In The Enterprise" 24 August 2012. Web.27 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/strategic-direction-of-apple-in-the-enterprise-81768>
"Strategic Direction Of Apple In The Enterprise", 24 August 2012, Accessed.27 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/strategic-direction-of-apple-in-the-enterprise-81768
The Porter Five Forces Model has also shown these strengths and their ability to provide the company with resilience in the face of significant competitive threats. Weaknesses include too much fo a dependence on the iPhone and iPad products, a lack of products at the low-end of the market, and a lack of control of the gray market in China for their products (Apple Investor Relations, 2012). The opportunities
Table 2: Distribution of Revenue by Product Area Source: (Apple Investor Relations, 2008) (Prudential Equity Group LLC, 2006) Planning The cornerstone of Apple's planning processes is the continual development of products and services that compliment the product and services ecosystem shown in Figure 1 (Apple Investor Relations, 2008) (Prudential Equity Group LLC, 2006). Figure 1: Apple Product and Services Ecosystem Source: (Apple Investor Relations, 2008) (Prudential Equity Group LLC, 2006) For Apple, their future planning revolves
Apple is very interested in the selling process. As a consequence, Apple has made significant investments in programs designed to improve reseller sales. One of these programs is the Apple Sales Consultant Program. This program consists in placing Apple employees and contractors at selected third-party reseller locations. The reason behind this strategy consists in the fact that Apple's managers consider that one of the key factors that sustain a successful general
BEST BUY CO. INC. STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Strategic Analysis of Best Buy Current situation A- Current performance B- Strategic posture Corporate Governance A- Board of directors B- Top management External Environment: Opportunities and threats A- Natural physical environment B- Societal Environment C- Task Environment D- Summary of external environment Internal Environment: Strengths and Weakness A- Corporate Structure B- Corporate Culture C- Corporate resources D- Summary of internal environment Analysis of Strategic Factors (SWOT) A- Situational Analysis Strategic Alternatives and Recommended Strategy A- Strategic Alternatives Recommended Strategy Implementation Evaluations and control Part II Functional and Business strategies of
Reviving a Company: How to Bring New Life to a Mature Business An Independent Learning Project Poly-Metal Finishing, Inc. is a company that has had a successful history of more than thirty years in the metal-working industry, providing complete anodic service to the aerospace, military and commercial sectors. I have worked for this company for eight years and am now part of the management team. With a change in management has come the
Strategic leadership influence culture organization eventually organization succeed fail. Show examples Air Asia, Apple Enron (Failure). I limit references subject matter Edgar Schein's theories culture organization business management authors. The influence of strategic leadership on organizational culture and the ultimate success or failure of the organization The focus on strategic leadership and organizational culture has been increasing exponentially throughout the past recent years, in both the academic community, as well as among
Apple's trade show focus is on its core markets of science and research, education (which is nearly 30% of total laptop and PC sales) (Apple Investor Relations, 2011), enterprise, and the vast global home market (Mitchell, 2011). Apple is very selective about the trade shows it participates in based on these criterion of markets served and total available market available, and also uses a series of metrics and key