Telecom Act Of 1996 Was Term Paper

Instead the opposite has happened. Competition in local telephone markets has failed to materialize because the local telephone monopolies have refused to open their networks to new entrants who must rely on parts of the monopoly network to provide local service. The major telephone companies have not sought to provide local telephone service outside of their home territories.(1) the Bell operating companies, instead of competing with each other for local customers, bought each other, creating a small number of dominant national firms with regional monopolies that are even more immune to competitive entry ("Lessons from 1996").

Regional Bell companies, unable to remain competitive as their brethren merged, were forced to do the same.

These effects were seen almost immediately when the Act was signed into law. Announcement of proposed mergers were made immediately by four of the seven Bell regional holding companies. NYNEX was acquired by Bell Atlantic. Pacific Telesis was acquired by SBC ("The United States Telecommunications"). One after the other mergers were announced, further reducing competition, rather than spurring it on. And the regional Bell companies, that were once powerfully profitable, completely lost their individual identities.

Conclusion:

Although the Telecommunications Act eliminated cross-industry barriers that prevented cable, long distance, and regional...

...

Today, consumers can receive Internet service through their cable TV provider or their telephone service provider. Packages including cable TV, phone and Internet are available from a couple of companies. However, the regional Bells aren't able to enjoy these new market opportunities as they've been transformed into national conglomerates, with the series of mergers and acquisitions that followed the Telecommunications Act.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

FILE s652.enr. 3 Jan 1996. FCC. November 3, 20007 http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.pdf.

Glassman, J. 5 Feb 2001. The Telecom Act, Five Years Later: Deregulation or Remonopolization? Reason Magazine. November 3, 2007 http://www.reason.com/news/show/36043.html.

Kall, M. 19 Feb 1996. The Telecommunications Act: The Good, Bad, and Unknown. TidBITS.com. November 3, 2007 http://db.tidbits.com/article/1130.

Lessons from 1996 Telecommunications Act:
Deregulation Before Meaningful Competition Spells Consumer Disaster. Feb 2001. Consumers Union. November 3, 2007 http://www.consumersunion.org/telecom/lessondc201.htm.
The United States Telecommunications Act of 1996. 1998. National Telecommunications & Information Administration. November 3, 2007 http://www.ntia.doc.gov/opadhome/overview.htm.


Cite this Document:

"Telecom Act Of 1996 Was" (2007, November 04) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/telecom-act-of-1996-was-34646

"Telecom Act Of 1996 Was" 04 November 2007. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/telecom-act-of-1996-was-34646>

"Telecom Act Of 1996 Was", 04 November 2007, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/telecom-act-of-1996-was-34646

Related Documents

Sikhs are also mistakenly included since police are unable to detect the difference. (District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia Advisory Committees to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 2003) a lot of people are being arrested on very technical immigration infringements of visa, and immigration judges will never let go an individual till the FBI articulates a curiosity in that particular person. For instance, on one occasion a student

Confidence in Hong Kong's legal system is a direct result of its links with the rest of the world. if, in our haste to use Chinese, we change the standard and the meaning of the law, and non-Chinese speakers get pushed out of practice, then we risk losing those links.' The traditional Chinese structure has focused on mediation for civil and commercial cases, with lawyers widely viewed as troublemakers, and

Communications In 1996 the promise of low priced long distance calls and improved customer service that would naturally result from a planned increase in competition was a siren song for legislators and yet, as law makers would discover in the ensuing years, the Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 not only had little impact on the long distance price issue but also stymied growth in the development and availability of internet

U.S. Debt Crisis
PAGES 10 WORDS 2900

U.S. Debt Crisis Financial crisis is not a totally new concept. It is a fact that more than three quarters of the entire members of the IMF, whether they are developed or developing countries have been affected by a serious financial crisis ever since the year 1980, demonstrating the instability of the world wide global economy. The origins of the financial crises may be different, but what all these crises have

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition

WorldCom Prior to the corporate financial scandal, WorldCom was one of the largest long distance telephone companies (Reuters, 2003). Initially headquartered in Mississippi it later moved to Virginia. The company grew fast by acquiring other companies such as MCI Communications in 1998 and UUNET technology in 1996. Other companies acquired included, Metromedia in 1992, Resurgens Communications Group in 1993. In the course of this acquisition spree, WorldCom undertook two complex