The mechanisms that have been put forth to handle issues of day amercement are rudimentary to the knowledge of many people in the U.S. For instance, day Fines is subject to the capabilities of the offenders. It is not a subject imposed to all offenders no with no consideration of their financial stabilities. Nonetheless, offenders who are judged to be within the bracket of paying day charge make it an obligation. The U.S. has state and federal strategies on imprisonment of offenders have received an enormous boost with involvement of the day Fines services.
The federal government of the U.S. has found a more equitable and distributive way of punishing offenders with day fines. Traffic offenders are rampant and active most of the day times. Since they are individuals who operate most of their activities during the daytime, the federal state perceives day fines as a more eloquent way of ending their difficulties when they face prosecutions due to minor and serious offenses. Through day fines, the courts have found a better way of dealing with rich offenders who find it legible when they are made to face the common courses of offenses in the society. At the end of the day, the government feels that it has offered punishment of traffic offenders in a more jurisdictional way possible. For instance, the court establishes the amounts of income per day of every offender. This means that those who are known to earn higher income per day are made to pay for punishment with respect to their amounts of income per day. This helps to reduce burdensome punishment on offenders who are not able to earn higher amounts of income per day (Tonry, 1998).
Before the adoption of the day fines punishment in the U.S., the United States involved the common way of punishing offenders. Most offenses were punishable through incarceration and other related approaches. Nonetheless, the state viewed every traffic crime as to consume a considerable amount of time than most states and courts could allow. The rooms in prisons were congesting up with inmates who kept increasing in number. One of the lethal features that were used while the state managed to deal with offenders is the imposition of fines. These fines had no legible structure like that used by the European day fines system. Most punishments were delayed while the offenders were interfered in their rights and consequences of being found guilty. Although the government struggled to establish appropriate avenues of accommodating offenders, the options of jurisdiction and punishment by the courts were running out. When the U.S. compared the present system of punishment with the European day fines, the European system proved to be effective and efficient.
The implementation processes involved with day fines incorporated most of the structures that dictated the need to have a formal ground of establishing law and order within the country. The European system posed equitable ways of managing cases that involved remuneration of the offender's salaries and linking them with punishments for the offenses committed. This has served to reduce a number of complications that were being experienced by the country throughout the onset of the court systems. Moreover, such period involved establishment of laws and regulations that provided ways of managing humanitarian activities (Mays & Winfree, 2009).
The United Kingdom is one of the European countries that have involved the use of day fines in controlling and monitoring traffic offences and offenders in the country. Day fines offer a rudimentary approach in which the United Kingdom has managed to have a solid foundation of fighting and punishing crimes. In most cases, the cases involving offenders are used to gauge the financial capabilities of the offenders in order to manage ways of freeing them other than crowding on the justice systems of the country (Justice Management Institute., & Vera Institute of Justice, 1996). For instance, various courts in London and Manchester impose day fines to traffic offenders in order to reduce cases of case delays and prosecution of individuals when their rights have been infringe in one way or the other.
Day Fines are applied depending on offender characteristics and capabilities. The invention of the day fines system by the United States traffic system paved a way in which the country managed to reduce on cases of offenders binding up. Moreover, it reduced cases of filling the prisons. The citizens have come to understand the basic facets that make up the system in order to foster an equitable justice system in the country. Traffic violation is understood to be a crucial feature that has rocked most states in the U.S. In fact, traffic violation has played an influential role in contributing to an increase in the number of criminals destined to prisons and courts. The government of the U.S. knows the need and importance of having a ground state management and control of traffic violation activities in the country. Day fines system of managing traffic violation is considered equitable and possible in many states of the U.S. (Levinson & Sage Publications, 2002).
The basic mechanisms involved by the state in establishing day fines were with the use of units. In the Staten Island in which day fines had been incorporated into the traffic system of the country, units were used as basic functionalities that brought the issue of day Fines in traffic systems. The court was served with the establishment and using units that corresponded with the offenses incurred by the individual people. Part of the offenses and units involved punishment through imprisonment. Offenders of traffic laws and regulations were rated less than one unit as far as their daily income is concerned. In many cases, the court established units that matched with what was required of every offender of traffic laws and regulations. Other different units served to improve connections and functionalities emanating from other cases from the court. With an increase of the court cases and imprisonment, the country saw it equitable to involve immediate day fines that could free offenders once they had committed and fulfilled financial requirements basing on the offenses incurred (Pollock, 2008).
Day fines were collected and enforced based on what the offenders could manage to offer in response to their varied offenses. Monitoring of every happening that took place between the offenders and the court administration tips the magnitude of success expected of every process in and out of court. With involvement of the European mode of day fines, many nations have reduced congestion in courts, and have encouraged care and responsiveness among the offenders. For instance, monitoring of the payments are done through physical contacts, mails, phone calls, and any other method that is perceived to bear fruit to the country. When compared to conventional ways that were used to render fines to offenders, the initial method proves to be equitable and effective to all the parties involved.
Each unit is established depending on the dollar value it can accrue. Offenses are sensible to human nature. They portray a legible way of establishing justice and cohesion within a state. In many cases, it is cheap to have dollar generations in handling offenses and offenders in and out of courts. The dollar or financial amount employed should be within the reach of the offender at all times. The offenses committed should be reflected clearly by the method used to deal with them in the court. At no time should the offense not be reflected by the dollar level awarded. For instance, every offense should have an equitable payment mechanism. It is understood that the U.S. viewed used of dollar generations as effective ways of getting to punish offenders. Physical punishments like imprisonment acted as natural platforms over which offenders engaged in other crime activities. The criminal activities did not contribute to the success and functionality of the immediate societies. Before the court imposes any fines to an offender, it ensures that the fines have been established as unit components of the dollar values.
The American traffic violation system has received immense support from its involvement with the European day fines system. The European day fines system is effective, influential, and easy to manage within the country. As used in some states, the day fines system is perceived with intense ease of use and manipulation in order to yield credit to the user organizations. In most cases, the system is friendly to the court system as well as the offenders and the national legal system as a whole. For instance, day fines system enables the country to reduce cases of congestion and struggles to establish options of offering prosecutions to the offenders of traffic justice. Moreover, the European day fines system provided a palatable ground over which justice is administered equitably to all the people involved and the national legal system.
Use of the day Fines system in traffic violation systems
There are a number of states in the U.S., which have involved the use of day fines in most of their…