Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
More than twenty-five years ago, Jack Mezirow initiated a profound movement in the field of adult education, that of transformative learning theory. Since this time, the concept of transformative learning has been a topic of much research and theory building in the field of adult education as described in more detail in this research paper. Although Mezirow is considered to be the major developer of transformative learning theory, other perspectives about transformative learning have emerged and are still emering, indicating that Mezirow's work was just a beginning.
Today there are four major models of transformative learning: the cognitive-rational approach of Mezirow, Freire's social transformation, the concept of development by Daloz and spirituality dimensions advocated by Dirkx and Healey. And, critics such as Boyd, and Clark and Wilson have criticized Mezirow's theory as too rationally driven. Even so, Merizow's theory still serves as a widely-used foundation to explain or compare the process that adult learners use to critically examine their beliefs, assumptions, and values as they acquire new knowledge and experience a "re-framing" of their perspective of circumstances, issues, and subsequent actions (Taylor, 1998). Transformative learning may not always be appropriate as a goal of adult education, but most educators agree that it does have postive potential and it is therefore important that adult educators understand it.
Jack Mezirow developed the concept of perspective transformative learning in 1978. Mezirow explained his theory is an abstract, generic, individualized process of adult learning (Mezirow, 1991). Transformative learning offers an explanation for change in meaning structures that originated in two domains of learning based on the epistemology of Habermas'communicative theory, instrumental learning and communicative learning. Instrumental learning is concerned with learning through task-oriented problem solving and determination of cause and effect relationships -- learning to do, based on empirical-analytic discovery. Communicative is defined as learning involved in understanding the meaning of what others communicate concerning values, ideals, feelings, moral decisions as well as other concepts as freedom, justice, love, labor, autonomy, commitment and democracy.
Mezirow believed that when instrumental learning and communicative learning involve reflective assessment of premises and movement through cognitive structure by identifying and judging presuppositions, transformative learning is occurring. (Mezirow, 1991). Mezirow developed transformative learning to explain how expectations, framed within cultural assumptions and presuppositions, directly influence the meaning derived from experiences. He identified ten sequential stages of transformative learning (Mezirow, 1995):
1. A disorienting dilemma
2. Self-examination with feelings of guilt or shame
3. A critical assessment of assumptions
4. Recognition that one's discontent and process of transformation are shared and that others have negotiated a similar change
5. Exploration of options for new roles, relationships, and actions
6. Planning of a course of action
7. Acquisition of knowledge and skills for implementing one's plans
8. Provisionally trying out new roles
9. Building of competence and self-confidence in new roles and relationships
10. A reintegration into one's life on the basis of conditions dictated by one's new perspective.
"Perspective transformation is the process of becoming critically aware of how and why our assumptions have come to constrain the way we perceive, understand, and feel about our world; changing these structures of habitual expectation to make possible a more inclusive, discriminating, and integrating perspective; and, finally, making choices or otherwise acting upon these new understandings" (Mezirow, 1991). According to Mezirow, transformational learning is optimized by communication free of distortion and manipulation, but these factors are inevitable. Transformational theory states that these barriers can be overcome through critical reflection, rational discourse, and experience (Mezirow, 1978). For learners to change their specific beliefs, attitudes, and emotional reactions, they must engage in critical reflection on their experiences, which in turn leads to a perspective transformation (Mezirow, 1991).
Today, transformative learning has evolved into a more comprehensive and complex description of how learners construe, validate, and reformulate the meaning of their experience (Cranton 1994). Cranton states that "Perspectives on adult learning have changed dramatically over the decades. Adult learning has been viewed as a process of being freed from the oppression of being illiterate, a means of gaining knowledge and skills, a way to satisfy learner needs, and a process of critical self-reflection that can lead to transformation. Thus, Cranton concludes that, "The phenomenon of adult learning is complex and difficult to capture in any one definition." Although there are many conflicting meanings, perhaps the more modern-day definition developed by O'Sullivan (2003) best captures the broader views of today's transformative learning:
"Transformative learning involves experiencing a deep, structural shift in the basic premises of thought, feelings, and actions. It is a shift of consciousness that dramatically and irreversibly alters our way of being in the world. Such a shift involves our understanding of ourselves and our self-locations; our relationships with other humans and with the natural world; our understanding of relations of power in interlocking structures of class, race and gender; our body awarenesses, our visions of alternative approaches to living; and our sense of possibilities for social justice and peace and personal joy."
There are four major models of transformation learning: the cognitive-rational approach of Mezirow, Freire's social transformation, the concept of development by Daloz and spirituality dimensions advocated by Dirkx and Healey. Some views these models as contradictory, while others say it's a matter of emphasis that differentiation the theories.
3.1 Mezirow's Cognitive-Rational Approach
Mezirow's cognitive-rational approach focuses on the process of critical reflection and discussion. Rational thought and reflection are considered most important factors for transformational learning. For learners to change their meaning schemes (beliefs, attitudes, and emotional reactions), they must first engage in critical reflection on their experiences, which in turn leads to a perspective transformation (Mezirow 1991). These meaning structures are frames of reference that are based on individuals' cultural and contextual experiences and these influence how they behave and interpret events. Mezirow believes that perspective transformation usually results from a "disorienting dilemma," which is triggered by a life crisis or major life transition, although it may also result from an accumulation of transformations in meaning schemes over time (Mezirow 1995).
3.2 Paolo Freire's Social Transformation
Social transformation acknowledges social inequities and champions liberation. The main difference between Mezirow and Paolo Friere is that the later focuses more on social transformation while the former is more concerned with personal transformation. Friere believes that social transformation occurs as the critical consciousness of the oppressed are awakened so that they learn to perceive social political and economic contradictions and to take action against oppressive elements (Friere, 2002). This awakening of one's critical consciousness is a result of the educational process. Friere states that the disempowered already know a great deal about their sources of their oppression and what must be done to rise above them. But, what they do not have is an organized approach to translating their knowledge into action. The purpose of education, therefore, is to elicit knowledge and responses.
3.3 Daloz's Developmental Approach
Developmental Approach views understanding the meaning of one's life as fundamental to being human, and sees mentorship as a crucial factor for transformational learning. Daloz (1986) stated that it is frightening for students to let go of old conceptualizations of self and the world. He challenged teachers to place more emphasis on structuring their teaching for fostering personal development of the students rather than developing specific competencies. He frequently used the metaphor of transformation as a journey in which the mentor or instructor served as a gatekeeper as well as a guide for students on the journey (Daloz, 1999). Daloz suggests that mentors perform three functions: they support; they challenge; and they provide vision (Daloz, 1986).
3.4 Dirkx's and Healy's Spirituality Learning
The spiritual-integrative approach recognizes the resolving of inter-psychic conflicts as the key for transformational learning to take place; this view emphasizes the extra-rational. Dirkx (1998) asserts that the imagination facilitates learning through the soul, saying that transformational learning transcends beyond the ego-based, rational approach that relies on words to communicate ideas to an extra-rational, soul-based learning that emphasizes feelings and images. Healey (2000) researched practitioners of insight meditation and reported that they had an expanded self-awareness that led to a deep self understanding and mindfulness in the present.
4.0 Strengths and Weaknesses of Mezirow's Cognitive-Rational Approach
As previously discussed, Mezirow's theory of transformation emphasizes reflection, rational discourse, and experience. Although critics acknowledge these factors as central to transformative learning, some contend that Merizow's views are too rationally driven. Robert Boyd moves beyond the ego and the emphasis on reason and logic (Boyd and Myers, 1988). For example, he has developed a view of transformative learning as an intuitive, creative and emotional process. Further, he believes that the process of discernment is central to transformative education. This process involves receptivity, recognition, and grieving. An individual must be open to receiving alternative expressions of meaning, recognize that the old ways of perceiving are no longer relevant and move to adopt new ways, integrating old and new patterns.
Clark and Wilson have also critized Mezirow for focusing too exclusively on individual…[continue]
"Transformational Learning Theory In The Context Of Adult Learning" (2005, January 13) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformational-learning-theory-in-the-60975
"Transformational Learning Theory In The Context Of Adult Learning" 13 January 2005. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformational-learning-theory-in-the-60975>
"Transformational Learning Theory In The Context Of Adult Learning", 13 January 2005, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformational-learning-theory-in-the-60975
He attempts to show that this concept has emerged and is slowly developing in adult education to an extent that it has attracted both researchers and practitioners in the field. Actually, the author's main goal is to provide better understanding of the complexity of transformative learning through summarizing its main theoretical views in the field of adult learning. Generally, there are several adult learning theories that basically provide insights and
Adult Learning: Andragogy Adult learning as a concept was first introduced in Europe in the 50s (QOTFC, 2007). But it was in the 70s when American practitioner and theorist of adult education Malcolm Knowles formulated the theory and model he called andragogy. He defined andragogy as "the art and science of helping adults learn (Zmeryov, 1998 & Fidishun, 2000 as qtd in QOTFC)." It consists of assumptions on how adults
310). This seems entirely true, but I believe that it is seldom put into effect. The institution that was most relevant here was, of course, the hospital and the health system as a whole. Learning in a hospital is very different from learning in school. This is something that we failed to attend to with sufficient care as we worked with our adult learners. One of the key differences between
They are also learning new ideologies that transform their perspectives and broaden their viewpoints to gain a greater sense of understanding and awareness of the values of their jobs and how they subsequently change them as people -- which is the very essence of transformative learning. The proclivity for those who are in increasingly higher levels of education, particularly those in graduate school as opposed to undergraduate school to demonstrate
Millions of dollars are spent on test-prep manuals, books, computer programs and worksheets (Gluckman, 2002). Static/captive learning can help teachers around the nation prepare their students for standardized testing. Significance of the Study to Leadership A principal is the leader of the campus. The challenge for the principal is to know his or her district's mandated curriculum and make sure teachers are able to deliver it (Shipman & Murphy, 2001). As
learning can be categorized into three distinct groups: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Behaviorism refers to the student's interaction with the environment and focuses on the external aspects of learning and on that which encourages learning such as positive reinforcement on the one hand and punishment on the toehr. Cogntivism, on the other hand, focuses on attitudes, motivation, and ideas and refers to the brain's interaction with the academic environment
Applying Leadership Theory to Leadership Practice In this paper the writer researches and writes a literature review on a Applying Leadership Theory to Leadership Practice. The research paper is a comprehensive thematic review of the scholarly literature related to the topic. The leadership theories to focus on are: Path-Goal Theory; Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory; Psychodynamic Approach Theory; outcome and situational leadership; Leadership focused on effectiveness and productivity; Leadership and Body language;