Ultra-Nationalist Ideologies Were Far More Threatening On Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
939
Cite

¶ … ultra-nationalist ideologies were far more threatening on a worldwide scale than communism to the liberal belief in individual rights from 1920-1945," because it is unequivocally true. One of the principle means of corroborating this statement is to analyze the atrocities and events that led up to and included World War II, which took place during the aforementioned time frame. World War II was largely about the propagation offFascism, which is ultra-nationalism at its finest -- or at its worse for the millions of people who were slaughtered in the wake of this ideology prior to and during World War II. An examination of first hand sources from the Japanese invasion of China, Italy, and from communist Russia indicate that ultra-nationalism was far more restrictive in individual rights than communism -- for the simple fact that the latter belief circumscribed such rights while the former simply eradicated them. Japan's invasion of China during the so-called fall of Nanking was largely based upon nationalistic tendencies. The Japanese prioritized its own nation above China, and were seeking to appropriate its territory and resources -- including people, commerce, and property -- for its own gain. As such, the Japanese offered little if any individual rights for the Chinese during this invasion and occupation. Their wanton slaughter of Chinese people and their wholesale raping and extermination of Chinese women was so pervasive that other international...

...

An examination of the following quotation from the diary of the German leader of that safety zone, John Rabe, demonstrates that even this zone did little to stop the Japanese troops from doing whatever they wanted to the Chinese.
Of the perhaps one thousand soldiers that we had quartered at the Minsitry of Justice, between 400 and 500 were driven from it with their hands tied. We assumed they were shot since we later heard several salvos of machine-gun fire. These events have left us frozen with horror (Rabe 245).

This passage indicates that the Japanese were willing to murder disarmed Chinese troops. Other entries in Rabe's diary allude to looting and raping, and simply slaughtering innocent Chinese citizens. It is crucial to note that the Japanese did not regard the Chinese as innocent, however. Their noxious actions were largely fueled by a nationalist sentiment that perpetuated the notion that those from China -- whether they were actual soldiers or not -- were the enemy. Thus, it is apparent that in the name of nationalism, the Japanese violated the individual rights of the Chinese.

Once one realizes the link between a strong national identity/ideology and fascism, it becomes possible to see how such an ideology is…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Not certain of the names of these books, but I put the page numbers in the citations for you


Cite this Document:

"Ultra-Nationalist Ideologies Were Far More Threatening On" (2013, May 15) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ultra-nationalist-ideologies-were-far-more-90402

"Ultra-Nationalist Ideologies Were Far More Threatening On" 15 May 2013. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ultra-nationalist-ideologies-were-far-more-90402>

"Ultra-Nationalist Ideologies Were Far More Threatening On", 15 May 2013, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ultra-nationalist-ideologies-were-far-more-90402

Related Documents

During this period, Austria also continued industrial expansion, but at a slower pace than Germany. With growth came further instability. Investment and founding of new organizations exploded since 1867, with over 400 new corporations being founded (Pulzer 1964) from 1867 to 1872. This was the age of the Gruender, which meant "entrepreneur," but also came to be associated with financially shaky schemes which resulted in the bursting of a speculative

Catholic church and public policy have remarked that the members of American clergy in general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are all in favour of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political system. They keep aloof from parties, and from public affairs. In the United States religion exercises but little influence upon laws, and upon the details of public opinion; but it