University Of Phoenix Overview Business Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
822
Cite

Key success factors

The following are the most critical success factors today for University of Phoenix:

Consistently attracting qualified students by developing relationships with corporations who offer reimbursement.

This Is critical for the long-term growth of the university, specifically working with larger corporations who offer attractive educational reimbursement programs to their students.

Developing more global opportunities for growth by partnering with other universities in Europe and Asia. University of Phoenix needs to also partner with universities in other regions of the world to extend its reach as well. The cultural differences in online learning in Europe and Asia require local partners to assist with the tailoring of content for needs in these markets.

Stability of 21,000 member faculty. This is also another key attribute to the success of the university, as the learning curve to have instructors teach online is significant. Stabilizing its workforce is critical.

Continually expanding the number of programs offered. This is also critical as it is necessary for the university to expand the total available market it serves.

Financial situation/needs

Today Apollo Group is profitable yet finds itself in the need of the following strategies to sustain its growth:

Strategies to increase net contribution margin. Currently Apollo Group overall and the University of Phoenix...

...

Programs for increasing this figure are necessary for the company to finance future growth.
Greater focus on accounting compliance. As of August, 2006 the company has delayed the filing of its 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission due to stock option grants reviews by its board of directors.

Greater expansion into Asia and Europe. The growth in sales signals that Apollo and University of Phoenix may be nearing saturation in the U.S. market and that global growth is now critical to the company's continued revenue and income growth.

Primary competitors

The following companies are the primary competitors to Apollo Group and University of Phoenix:

Career Education Corporation

DeVry Inc.

Edison Schools Inc.

Education Management Corporation

Laureate Education, Inc.

Learning Tree International, Inc.

Strayer Education Inc.

Opportunities

Despite the many challenges Apollo Group faces in growing University of Phoenix, there are significant opportunities for growth today. These include the following:

Demand for online education on the rise

Entry into China and India

Greater need for health care professionals and teachers

Standard course materials and adaptation of centralized services

US military contracts to provide programs

Cite this Document:

"University Of Phoenix Overview Business" (2006, August 23) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/university-of-phoenix-overview-business-71451

"University Of Phoenix Overview Business" 23 August 2006. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/university-of-phoenix-overview-business-71451>

"University Of Phoenix Overview Business", 23 August 2006, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/university-of-phoenix-overview-business-71451

Related Documents

Potential for denial of service attacks. Section 4. Recommendation. Based on the company's current adult student enrollment percentages and identified trends and opportunities, it is recommended that Apollo Group, Inc. more aggressively pursue the domestic 46 years-and-over market which currently stands at just over 10%. As Arsenault and Anderson (1998) emphasize, "The needs, interests, and expectations of retiring baby boomers will be significantly different than those of their parents and grandparents. Future

This strategy was combined with the company's focus on CAFE-based compliance and support for Fair Trade-based trading practices with coffee suppliers. This renewed focus on managing their supply chains to tighter levels of profitability and performance metrics including increasing quality standards has led to a significant reduction in operating expenses and control of variable costs (Starbucks Investor Relations, 2011). Starbucks was also able to manage costs of closing locations

Oxford Brookes University BSc (Hons) in Applied Accounting Research and Analysis Project An Analysis of the Business and Financial Performance of StarHub Group from 2008 to 2010 Topic chosen and for the reason For the basis of my Oxford Brookes University degree research and analysis project (RAP) is project, the topic selected was number 8, "The business and financial performance of organisation over the three years period." This selection is due in large part

Fixtures are considered part of personal property, but in cases where they become a part of real property and cannot be removed, they are considered part of real property. Building on a plot of land is a fixture that is considered part of real property, similarly things that are fixed with the real property and can not be removed without damage can be considered part of real property. In case

Calverta's Case Study Company Overview Calveta was founded by the Italian immigrant Antonio Calveta in 1966 that instilled a strong set of values into the foundation of the company. A neighborhood restaurant in Brooklyn expanded into a couple more and then in 1972 the company crafted a niche by beginning meal deliverance services to nursing homes. The market was a very promising one as most nursing homes in the United States chose

Strategy and SWOT Analysis Key Concepts in Business Strategy and SWOT Analysis Creating a competitive business advantage is a complex endeavor. Various techniques have been developed to guide the self-analysis process practiced by business enterprises. Traditional strategic planning engages a company in both internal and external analysis. In order to conduct a strategic analysis that makes niche or unique opportunities salient, it is necessary to have a robust view of the competitive