Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. together with other judges; however, expressed discomfort with what they termed government sanctioned bodily intrusions using sharp needles (Liptak, 2013).
Missouri prosecutors' petition was occasioned by a case where one Tyler G. McNeely was pulled over for speeding on a highway. Tyler, according to the Supreme Court, had the telltale signs of intoxication (Liptak, 2013). He had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and had the smell of alcohol in his breath. Besides, his performance in field sobriety test was poor. Tyler was adamant about taking breath test. He did not consent to taking blood test either. A blood test was nevertheless taken and the results showed that the blood alcohol level was 0.15%. The state court suppressed the evidence provided on grounds that the officers failed to obtain a warrant to enable them conduct bodily intrusions. The Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11-1425, raised issues concerning whether dissipation of blood alcohol can justify taking ones blood without a warrant in case of absence of additional factors complicating matters (Liptak, 2013).
With regard to judicial officers engaging in judicial campaigns, I totally concur with the writer's position that this negates the officers' impartiality and contribute to impropriety in dispensing justice. The Code of Judicial Conduct is very explicit on the conduct of court judges. It also illuminates matters pertaining impropriety on the bench. A judge who has been supported by corporate bodies like the oil, gas, electrical, and chemical industries in his...
John Summers is anything to go by. The writer of this article is against the position of conservatives on judicial campaigns.
The article is very fair as it provides sentiments expressed by some officers of the Court like Justice Willet vis-a-vis the Texan Judicial Code of Conduct.
Regarding Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11-1425, I totally disagree with the outcome of this article where Justice Scalia proposes that drivers who have refused to take breath test be told that blood would otherwise be drawn because a warrant had been requested. This boils down to intimidation and violation of constitutional rights that are safeguarded by Fourth Amendment provisions. Before a warrant is given an independent magistrate should review the evidence provided. This article is unbiased as it presents the positions of both the protagonists and the antagonists. It does not take side. The author of this article does not tell the readers the position s/he has taken.
References List
Cohen, a. (2012, Oct. 11). Would you Trust These State Justices to Review Your Cases. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/would-you-trust-these-s tate-justices-to-review-your-case/262480/
Liptak, a. (2013, Jan. 9). Justices Look at Legality of Drunken-Driving Test. New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/us/supreme-court-weighs-drunken-driving-blood-tests.html?_r=0
The 16th Amendment was the first to be passed in the 20th century. It allowed incomes to be taxed as a clear response to the Supreme Court decision in the Pollock v Farmers' Loan and Trust Company (Fonder and Shaffrey 2002). Congress previously passed an income tax law in 1894, which the Supreme Court found to be unconstitutional, not being divided among the states by population. Before the 16th Amendment,
This as an important moment in the history of the Cold War because it marked the start of a new series of talks between the Palestinians and the Israeli side. This moment also proved the importance of the State Secretary in relation to the issues of foreign policy and the international community. At this moment, some of the most important cabinets in the executive concern issues such as internal affairs
A long passage is quoted here by way of showing what all these various writers are concerned about: (Kane, 2003)May 2002 brought the odd spectacle of ex-President Jimmy Carter standing shoulder to shoulder in Havana with one of the U.S. government's oldest enemies, Cuban president Fidel Castro. Carter, on a mission to convey a message of friendship to the Cuban people and to seek some common ground between Cuba
According to the U.S. Department of Justice there are now 1.5 million individuals in prison facilities in the U.S. For the following types of offenses: Drug Offense 59.6% Robbery 9.8% Property Offenses 5.5% Extortion, Fraud, Bribery 6.8% Violent Offenses 2.7% Firearms, Explosives, Arson 8.6% White Collar 1.0% Immigration 2.8% Courts or Corrections 0.8% National Security 0.1% Continuing Criminal Enterprise 0.8% Miscellaneous 1.5% Source Bureau Justice Statistics online at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ The following table labeled Table 1.0 shows the drug arrested for each year running from 1986 to 2002, the drug categories and the number of arrested in
So who is an American and what an America can or cannot do are questions which are critical to the issue of legalizing immigrants. Does being an American mean you cannot show allegiance to any other country? The images of people raising and waving Mexican flag had enraged many but it need not have. It should be accepted that people who come from different countries would forever hold in their
heard in the U.S. Supreme Court -- Washington v. Harper -- will be the focus of the first part of this paper. The second part reviews prison conditions in Texas. Washington v. Harper -- Part One This was a case resulting from the unstable mental condition of Walter Harper, who has been incarcerated in the Washington state prison system since a robbery conviction in 1976. Harper has been administered antipsychotic drugs