U S Sanctions Economic Sanctions Are an Important Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

U.S. Sanctions

Economic sanctions are an important tool of U.S. foreign policy. They are used for a variety of reasons and often have substantial repercussions for countries on the receiving ends. Sanctions are used as a way to stop objectionable actions of foreign governments such as: to stop military adventures, arms proliferation, support of terrorism and drug trafficking, and human rights abuses among others. (Department of the Treasury website, 2002) "In conjunction with diplomacy and other measures, sanctions seek to demonstrate U.S. resolve and express outrage, change the behavior of the target country, and deter other countries from resorting to similar actions in the future." (Carter, 1988)

"Sanctions provide a middle road response between diplomacy and military action." (Day, 1992) Ineffective sanctions have led to U.S. military intervention in Panama, Haiti, Somalia, and Iraq, just to name a few places, and the consequences have been quite harsh. Not to mention the fact that they have not succeeded in changing the policies as they were intended for. "In Iraq, President Bush deemed the rapid deployment of troops necessary to counter Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait; but in the other cases, the U.S. armed forces have intervened after sanctions made a bad situation worse." (ENGAGE, 2002)

In recent times, sanctions have served various purposes, including warning states that their behavior is unacceptable, influencing a modification of that behavior, and threatening stronger action should the offending state refuse to comply. Not until the end of World War I did states begin to explore the notion of employing economic sanctions as a substitute to a purely military response. The end of World War II ushered in a critical new element to sanctioning: the establishment of an instrument to provide for the collective security of all states. (Hufbauer, 1997)

Types of Sanctions

The federal government has discretion under a multitude of statutes to prohibit or otherwise restrict commercial relations, private and government-assisted commerce, and financing between the United States and other countries. When needed, the Congress can provide additional authority. Within those broad categories of commerce, seven major types of sanctions are possible under current laws: restrictions on international transport, personal travel, and communication; on current exports; on current imports; on foreign aid; on trade promotion activities by the government; on lending by international financial institutions, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund; and on private financing of trade and investment. In many cases, sanctions against a particular country or sanctions to promote a particular policy include a collection of government actions to restrict different aspects of commerce, based on various statutes and regulations. (Carter, 1988)

At any time, the President can take a variety of diplomatic actions that affect all types of trade and investment by altering the basic environment for commercial relations. Those actions include changing the rules of special programs -- some of which were part of bilateral agreements -- that establish the rights of foreigners to dock their ships in U.S. ports or land their aircraft on U.S. soil. In addition, the government can impede the ability of businesses to communicate and make deals by prohibiting foreigners from visiting the United States and discouraging U.S. citizens from traveling abroad. (Department of the Treasury website, 2002)

Restrictions on the sale of U.S. goods and services abroad generally have one of two objectives. In some cases, the goal is to limit some or all trade with specific countries. In others, it is to limit trade in the technologies that underlie those goods and services -- technologies that could be used to the detriment of national security.

The President's control over imports is not as sweeping or direct as his control over exports. Authority exists to restrict the imports of certain goods through quotas and to raise tariffs on imports from certain countries. Import quotas are generally a tool of commercial policy, imposed to protect domestic industries by specifying maximum levels of imports. In the past, however, the government has revised quotas for various commodities to achieve foreign policy and national security goals. The same is true for tariffs, which are fees levied on imports from a particular country. Tariffs are also instruments of commercial or sometimes economic development policy that lawmakers can alter to pursue foreign policy ends. (Carter, 1988)

The government can directly influence trade and foreign investment through its spending on foreign aid and trade promotion, including its support of lending activities by international financial institutions. Restrictions on such spending do not constitute sanctions in some people's view because they withdraw a benefit rather than impose a cost. Access to government assistance is not a right, the argument goes. But many studies of sanctions do include actions to restrict government assistance, and some mistakenly identify those restrictions as a cost to the nation.

Actions that restrict government assistance are a particular concern for some supporters of the agriculture industry. The reason is that the United States sends a large dollar amount of agricultural products abroad as food aid or with the benefit of federal export subsidies. In 1997, for example, U.S. exports of food, feed, and beverages totaled over $50 billion. Foreign assistance paid for $0.8 billion of that as food aid, and new federally guaranteed loans helped finance another $2.4 billion of those agricultural exports. (Hufbauer, 1997)

Much of the United States' foreign assistance is bilateral -- provided directly to other countries. That assistance takes the form of supplying less developed countries with in-kind aid, grants to pay for the purchase of U.S. goods and services, and technical support. The U.S. government also funds the development activities of international organizations such as the United Nations. In all, the government spent nearly $11.2 billion on development, humanitarian, and security assistance in 1997. (Hufbauer, 1997)

The Effects of U.S. Sanctions

Sanctions impact on households by limiting families' access to foodstuffs and other essential supplies. Unemployment and inflation reduce a family's purchasing power, forcing them into debt and deprivation. Destitution increases household reliance on social assistance and government handouts. Meanwhile, economic hardship caused by sanctions reduces government revenues, forcing bureaucracies to cut back on social programs, including health, education, food subsidies and support for the destitute. The result is a drastic decline in the standard of living of most households, and exhaustion of pre-existing coping strategies. The poorest households are affected first, and their children affected most.

In both Iraq and Haiti, sanctions resulted in dramatic increases in the price of staple foods. In Iraq, 1995 market prices had increased to more than 1,000 times their pre-sanctions levels. More costly food directly contributed to rising rates of malnutrition. In Iraq, from 1991 to 1995, wasting among under-5's quadrupled to 12%, while stunting doubled to 28% Meanwhile, in Haiti, one study demonstrated a rise in child malnutrition from 7 to 35% in the two years following the introduction of sanctions. (Hufbauer, 1997)

Sanctions also affect food production and agriculture. In both Haiti and Iraq, agricultural inputs - including spare parts, seeds, fertilizers and pesticides - were either restricted or in short supply. The high cost of scarcely available cooking fuel led to increased use of charcoal and firewood, contributing to deforestation and environmental degradation. In Haiti, charcoal consumption increased by 19% during the first year of the embargo, equivalent to cutting an additional 220,000 tons of wood. (Hufbauer, 1997)

In sanctioned countries, medicines and medical supplies, despite their general exemption, frequently remain in short supply. In Haiti, essential drugs were often unavailable at public facilities. In Yugoslavia, it was estimated that the availability of medicines under sanctions declined by more than 50%. In Iraq, the shortfall of medicines was closer to 90% - and included antibiotics, anesthetics, X-ray films, intravenous fluids and surgical supplies. (Hufbauer, 1997)

The immunization of children also suffers in countries affected by sanctions. In Haiti, problems with vaccine supply and the cold chain were cited as having contributed to lower vaccination rates. National measles coverage declined from 40 to 24% during the first year of the Haiti crisis. A deadly measles epidemic during 1992/93 was directly attributed to the breakdown of immunization coverage. In Iraq, vaccination programs were suspended in late 1990 due to shortages of syringes and other consumables, and vaccine coverage did not regain pre-sanctions levels until late-1991. The incidence of vaccine-preventible diseases, including pertussis, measles, diphtheria and polio all increased in Iraq during 1991/92. (Hufbauer, 1997)

Furthermore, the increase in infectious diseases uniformly observed in all sanctioned countries has been partly attributed to the deterioration of water and sanitation services, made worse by long delays in obtaining Security Council approval for spare parts and shortages of purification chemicals.

The above impacts have been associated with measurable increases in infant and child deaths. Child mortality rates increased under sanctions in Haiti, Yugoslavia and Iraq. In Iraq, under-5 mortality rates had tripled by late 1991, due to the combined influences of sanctions and war. The lack of reliable data, as well as methodological difficulties, have greatly complicated measurement of the precise contribution of sanctions,…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"U S Sanctions Economic Sanctions Are An Important" (2002, February 23) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-sanctions-economic-anctions-are-an-important-55809

"U S Sanctions Economic Sanctions Are An Important" 23 February 2002. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-sanctions-economic-anctions-are-an-important-55809>

"U S Sanctions Economic Sanctions Are An Important", 23 February 2002, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/us-sanctions-economic-anctions-are-an-important-55809

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • U S Foreign Policy and the

    They however fail to see the strategic linkage in the U.S. foreign policy. Israel is the most trusted ally of United States in the region. It has the same strategic interest as the United States and has a firm foundation of democratic support. The Arab governments on the other hand are unpopular, non-democratic and are in power due to the western interest in maintaining the status quo. Overthrow of the

  • U S Military Assistance Funding to

    On November 8, 2001, the U.S. Senate passed several new conditions before direct 'military-to-military relations can be restored with Indonesia including the punishment of the individuals who murdered three humanitarian aid workers in West Timor, establishing a civilian audit of armed forces expenditures, and granting humanitarian workers access to Aceh, West Timor, West Papua, and the Moluccas." Following are two very recent bills and rulings by the U.S. Congress concerning

  • U S Department of Treasury

    Department of Treasury The primary aim of the U.S. Department of the Treasury is the maintenance of a strong economy and the creation of job opportunities for the American people (U.S. Treasury, 2010). The Department achieves this through three key focuses. The first focus is the promotion of conditions that enable prolific economic stability and growth both within the U.S. As well as abroad. The second focus is on strengthening national

  • U S Approach to Terrorism Post 2001

    U.S. Approach to Terrorism U.S Approach to Terrorism Post 2001 The incidence of September 11, 2001 led to an anti-terrorism campaign by the government of U.S. And was called the war or terror. Since 2001, U.S. government has taken several steps to maintain security and counter terrorism by implementing certain strategies at national and international level. These approaches and steps, whether useful or not have been discussed in this paper. President Bush's Justifications

  • U S Securities and Exchange Commission

    Nevertheless such mandatory disclosures presume that people can and will cognitively appraise such disclosures as against to higher noise trading. In the light of realities of emotional regulating, the SEC in general and its compulsory disclosure regime is particular might perform more harm than good and yet stay because of the emotional appeal rationales and considerations. (Parisi; Smith, 2005) The history of U.S. federal securities regulation from the very beginning

  • U S cuba Relations and the Potential

    S., become attracted to the U.S. And flee the country. Cuba certainly needs to prevent a brain drain at all costs. It could do so by encouraging the U.S. To invest in its infrastructure and for U.S. doctors to train and learn at Cuban facilities, which, by all accounts, have some of the highest standards of excellence in the world (Schoultz, 2010, 8). By helping to build up the Cuban

  • U S Iran Diplomatic Pre and

    S. foreign policy. Under this new approach, Carter would directly meet with only government officials that had favorable human rights records. The problem was that the United States' relationship with the Shah was the key for maintaining control in the region. This meant that he had to make official trips to the country, even though he did not support this policy. As a result, Carter was indirectly endorsing activities of the

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved