Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The very structure of Apartheid was corrosive and thus led to the demise of the South African economy.
What is Apartheid?
Dutch and English Settlement. (Kahn)
Governmental Policies on Segregation ("Apartheid")
The structure of Apartheid
What affects did apartheid have on South Africa's economy?
Denial of Healthcare
Current and Future Economic Indicators
The apartheid in South Africa has been at the forefront of global issues for decades. The purpose of this discussion is to define the system of apartheid. We will review the history, structure and key players of the South African system of apartheid.
We will then explore the affects of apartheid on South Africa's economy. Our research will confirm that; the very structure of Apartheid was corrosive and thus led to the demise of the South African economy.
What is Apartheid
In the Afrikaans language the word apartheid actually means "apartness." (Eades) In South Africa, this system of apartness was based on skin color and geographic location. The definition of Apartheid is explained best in the book The Political Economy of Sanctions Against Apartheid. The author defines apartheid saying;
First, it is the hierarchical ordering of the whole social, economic and political structure of South African society on the basis of statutorily defined race.... Secondly, apartheid involves systematic political and economic discrimination against all blacks, but particularly against Africans. Thirdly, it involves segregation of the races not only politically and economically but also socially, particularly in housing and social services, including education and health care. Fourthly, apartheid is the legalization and institutionalization of this hierarchical, discriminatory and segregated system." (Kahn)
Long before Apartheid became the official political system of South Africa, the nation struggled with animosity among the races. Much of this animosity could be attributed to the settlement of the Dutchmen and Englishmen. Many of these settlers acquired their land through conquest and for that reason they feared the black majority. Thus the Europeans began to segregate themselves from the Africans. (Kahn)
Governmental policies of segregation began in 1910 when Blacks were prohibited from becoming members of parliament. ("Apartheid") The African National Congress was created in 1912 to confront the unfair treatment of Blacks. However, there was little that the ANC could do in 1913 when the government instituted a policy of allowing blacks to own only 13% of the land in South Africa. ("Apartheid")
The official practice of Apartheid in South Africa began in 1948 under the direction of The National Party and over time it grew into one of the cruelest political systems of the twentieth century. Many historians believe that the system was developed because of the conflicts that various migrating groups had with the native people of South Africa. The following paragraphs will actually explain the system of apartheid in greater detail.
The Structure of Apartheid
Within South Africa there are four different racial groups; Whites, Coloreds, Indians, and Blacks. Under Apartheid, the race of an individual determined the education that they could receive, who they had social contact with and where they could live. Whites (Europeans) had supremacy over all the other races -- they were first class citizens. Whites had access to the best neighborhoods, schools, social programs, healthcare...etc.
Coloreds, who were the second class of citizens, consisted of "indigenous Khoisan people and slaves imported from Madagascar, Indonesia, and tropical Africa." (Eades) Historically the Coloreds lived in the western section of the nation and most were farm laborers. They were very segregated from black Africans. They were also denied formal education unless they were educated at missions. After the apartheid began coloreds had more privileges than blacks and were actually allies with the National Party. (Eades)
The third class of citizens was the Indians. Some Indians were people whose Asian descendents were indentured servants who came to South Africa between 1860 and 1911 to work the sugar plantations. There were also Indians who flooded into the country in the 1870's as British subjects. Indians were recognized as citizens in the 1960's and were forced to move to crowded townships. Indians were treated worse than coloreds but a little better than blacks. It seems that Indians did not pose much of a threat to whites because they only made up 3% of the population. During apartheid Indians often allied with blacks but there was also animosity between the races.
The fourth class of citizens under apartheid was Africans. Under this system blacks were the most oppressed group even though they made up the largest segment of the population. Under apartheid blacks were forced from their home to live in townships, denied education, denied healthcare and were subjected to a great deal of brutality. Africans were seen as a great threat to White South Africa because they made up 70% of the population. This perceived threat caused the National Party to create a system of apartheid that would ensure that blacks could not have access to the same resources as whites. Over time this system made blacks a poor and destitute group within the nation of South Africa.
The end of Apartheid came in 1991 with the release of Nelson Mandela. Mandela was elected president in the nations first democratically held election. Today the affects of apartheid still linger with the people of South Africa. The next section of this report will deal with the economic effect of apartheid.
The affects of Apartheid on South Africa's Economy
The apartheid in South Africa had a devastating effect on the economy of South Africa. Many of the economic problems that exist in the nation today were created by the residue of the apartheid. Most notably is the large income disparity between whites and blacks.
The large income disparity was due in part to the government's creation of Bantu Homelands or townships. The government allotted these lands to Africans in an effort to further alienate them from white South Africans. A book entitled The End of Apartheid in South Africa explains,
The South African police forcibly removed people and destroyed their homes, the South African government gave them no compensation, and the new site of settlement often had no accommodations except sometimes tents, with inadequate water supplies and sanitation, and no basic social institutions. Forced removal became a major feature of African daily life, and the threat of resettlement affected almost every African in South Africa." (Eades)
These townships were on undeveloped land and thus there were no jobs for Blacks. At one point in the 1980's the unemployment rate for black was at 50%. Townships were extremely poor and plagued by disease because of poor sanitation and dirty drinking water. In addition, 70% of those that resided in townships lived below the poverty line.
Denial of Healthcare
The fact that blacks were denied good healthcare has also contributed greatly to the demise of the economy. Many in South Africa contracted deadly diseases under the apartheid which make it difficult or impossible for them to work. Additionally Black South Africans have been ravished by the AIDS virus. Much of this is due to the fact that they are uneducated about the disease and never get tested. (Ferreira and Kinsella) There is also a stigma attached to the disease which prevents some individuals with the disease from getting a job because they fear that they will be discriminated against by an employer.
The dehumanization that Africans endured as a result of apartheid also maimed their mentality. Many Africans have a difficult time integrating into society now that apartheid has ended. Apartheid created a nation that is still deeply divided and as you can see the very structure of apartheid was corrosive and the "apartness" that the system created led to the demise of the South African economy.
The apartheid created a nation of highly educated whites and a large percentage of poorly educated blacks. Large gaps in education also contribute to large income disparities. The lack of education among the majority of the people makes it very difficult for South Africa to compete in the global economy because there is a lack of skilled workers.
Another affect of apartheid on South Africa's economy has been crime. Crime is rampant in South Africa because so many are unemployed and they blame their white oppressors. This resentment of white South Africans has led to an increased number of car hijackings and robberies. In addition, black African's have killed white farmers and destroyed many of their farms.
Crime has also deterred foreign investors from engaging in business in South Africa. Some investors believe that the nation lacks the stability that is needed to have successful business. Many see an investment in the region as risky and extremely uncertain. (Fielding)
Current and Future Economic Indicators
The table below depicts some of the key economic indicators of the nation's economy. (Stals) As you can see this analyst predicts that South Africa's economy should slowly grow in the future. Whatever the future may hold it is with all certainty that we can…[continue]
"What Is Apartheid What Affects Did It Have On South Africa's Economy " (2003, April 14) Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/what-is-apartheid-affects-did-it-have-146671
"What Is Apartheid What Affects Did It Have On South Africa's Economy " 14 April 2003. Web.2 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/what-is-apartheid-affects-did-it-have-146671>
"What Is Apartheid What Affects Did It Have On South Africa's Economy ", 14 April 2003, Accessed.2 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/what-is-apartheid-affects-did-it-have-146671
South Africa consequently had to arrange for a down payment of $600 million at a rate perceived to be extraordinarily high. It was too late for the country to induce any negotiations of the deal. Serious agreements ensued thus maneuvering South Africa to pay back much of the nation's hard currency debt in a short period. This led to the emergence of a new democratic regime stemming from an
In 1990, Africa had 2% of the world's telephones, but in 2000 it had only 0.8%. (These data, taken from International Telecommunications Union tables, represent fixed lines, not wireless, and there are now more mobile telephone subscribers in Africa than fixed-line subscribers. 3 Nevertheless, with about 12% of the world's population, Africa is far behind in per capita telephone subscribers.) (Hundley, Anderson, Bikson & Neu, 2003, p. 126) More specifically, even
Investment in South Africa In your judgment, were the possible utilitarian benefits of building the Caltex plant in 1977 more important than the possible violations of moral rights and of justice that may be involved? Justify your answer fully by identifying the possible benefits and the possible violations of rights and justice that you believe may be associated with the building of the plant, and explaining which you think are more
Since they had so much invested in South Africa, they were in a position of power, and they could have used that power much more effectively. They might even have been able to bring change about sooner than it occurred. While they did not take their responsibility seriously, companies do have a moral and ethical responsibility to themselves, their communities, and their shareholders. The companies that do not recognize
SAB Miller In the 1990s, South Africa was undergoing a major transformation. This was in response to: the sudden social, economic and political changes in the post-apartheid environment. SAB Miller was able to use this change as a way to solidify their home market and expand to other regions. This is helped the firm to become the second largest beer producer in the world. However, like many multi-national corporations, the
Cultural Perceptions of Time in Africa Time is a foundational factor in every culture. The perception of time is different for most cultures and the determining factor to those differences is often based on the means of production. "Most cultures have some concept of time, although the way they deal with time may differ fundamentally." (Kokole 1994, 35) Tracing the perception of the concept of time in Africa can be seen
During the 1980s, to help spotlight international concern regarding the unprecedented nuclear arms race, India joined the Six-Nation Five-Continent joint. Amidst India's resolve to maintain its commitment to nuclear disarmament, it consistently opposed discriminatory treaties like the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT); holding its nuclear options while other countries hold their nuclear weapons/options (India's Foreign Policy… 2010). Another contemporary concern involves the fact that different departments report different