To further its leading place in this vital segment, the profile as the brand delivered the ideal fit for women. The goal was to propose pioneering women's footwear, apparel and accessories across the sports and lifestyle category, in order to enable women to convey their uniqueness.
With both stylish and useful products, emotional promotion concepts and partnerships with the best athletes (e.g. Amelie Mauresmo, Carolina Kluft, Nicole Vaidisova) and other celebrities (e.g. Scarlett Johansson), the corporation showed that Reebok was a product that fully understood the requirements of the female customer. But such niche segments ignored the male and children's market section, incurring a large amount of lost opportunity in these segments. For this reason, Adidas took steps to diversify the market positioning of the company (Annual Report 2006: Adidas, 2006).
And this was a necessary step that Reebok could not quite accomplish by itself. According to Terry Lefton (2009), the Reebok brand struggled with direction at the time of acquisition. Indeed, while it catered mostly to women, the company recognized the need to cater to the rest of the market in order to be able to compete with recognized giants such as Nike. With the latter also being a rival of Adidas, the merger made sense from the Reebok point-of-view.
Once again, a better sense of focus and leadership was required in order to bring more focus to the Reebok brand. The merger appears to be an attempt to remedy a deeper-lying problem rather than being a truly mutually beneficial deal for both parties involved.
3. A lack of proper direction/leadership in the company after the death of Mr. Adi Dassler: Mr. Dassler has been a very good leader and the pivot of the company. In his life the company was able to obtain 700 patents. He had very good leadership skills to make the company grow. But on the death of Mr. Dassler, the company itself was parallelized. Because...
Recent revolutionary change and restructuring in the company are the only solution to handle this problem.
The poor leadership issue is substantiated by an article on the Streetball and Hip-Hop Website (2008). One manifestation of the lack of direction is the Adidas logo. According to the article, the first Adidas logo was the trefoil. This was replaced by the performance logo in 1991. The use of the logo was however not consistent. In addition to a sudden change of color from green to black, the equipment logo was first used only on equipment products, but later also on products that were not from the equipment line.
Such a strategy would doubtlessly confuse the public and the customer base. Changing well-known logos at apparently random is a very inconsistent way of maintaining customer relationships.
4. Acquisition led to cross-cultural issues and inter-organisational change management issues: Few acquisitions raised the issue of cross-cultural problems and led to strong change management. The company faced problems at both times when acquiring Salomon SA and Reebok.
When acquiring Reebok, the latter was suffering from poor reputation for quality, innovation and styling: however, the deal seemed to present a profitable model for Adidas. Innovation and styling are the key of the industry, and Adidas was suffering from a decided lack of both. This lack translated into the partnership itself, and the joint efforts did not prove as profitable as anticipated.
While it was a logical deal in theory, the practical fact was that it did not prove to be as successful as it could have been. In terms of closing the gap between Adidas and Nike, however, the deal did prove helpful. It gave the German shoemaker about 22% of the U.S. shoe market, for example, compared with Nike's 36%.
The deal allowed Adidas to focus on premium products of excellent design and innovation -- the kind of shoes people with a large amount of money liked to buy. Reebok would fill the middle market, catering to the traditional ladies' aerobics and jazzercise categories. This included fashion shoes worn by suburban children who do not necessarily take part in sports. And had to keep up the successful hip-hop strategy.
Adidas might make little
This is based on both historical precedent and the fact that the firm has started to see year-over-year revenue declines. The company remains highly leveraged and although they are expected to remain liquid, this reality will place some constraints on Adidas. The company is likely to remain in a holding pattern for the next year, awaiting both economic recovery and the two major marketing events in 2010 -- the
Leading Adidas has a solid performance as a sustainability leader -- economic, environmental, and social. This despite accusations of slave-labor in China, which proved to be less than accurate. The company actively engages its stakeholders in key day-to-day operational issues that involve the environment, along with leading the market in advanced supply chain efforts to promote stability (Adidas, 2009). Controlling Adidas' strategy is to "be the leading sports brand in the world." To
WorldCom (CEO Bernard Ebbers) supported by years of profitability arising from the deregulation of phone companies was a fast moving stock that was highly toted by stock specialists as a must buy, even while it was seriously hemorrhaging from bad and fraudulent business deals and its own shoddy accounting, cover ups and bad investment deals. WorldCom quickly supplanted at&T as the favorite of many investors, based heavily on Grubman's recommendations.
Product Placement in Console Games A growing body of research confirms that one of the best ways to reach male consumers aged 18 to 34 years is to place products in console games. Originally, game developers paid advertisers to include their products in games to lend them authenticity and realism, but advertisers are now paying game developers to have their products placed in popular console games. The introduction of online gaming
Nike and Adidas both compete in the athletic apparel and footwear industries. Both companies offer roughly the same lineup of goods, so therefore are good corollaries for one another. Nike is based outside of Portland, Oregon while Adidas is based outside of Erlangen in Bavaria. The industry is worth approximately $126.3 billion worldwide, according to Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (2011). Nike's sales of $19.0 billion indicate that it has an
International Marketing of the Winter Olympics Properly planned and executed, hosts of the Winter Olympic Games stand to gain a great deal in terms of investments in infrastructure, the multiplier effect of travel and tourism, and the enhanced prestige on the global stage that goes hand in hand with hosting these international games. Improperly administered, though, hosts and corporate sponsors of the Winter Olympic Games are faced with some staggering economic