Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … dual-court system and explain the three-Tier nature of the U.S. federal judiciary.
Dual Court System The latter have to stem from a breach of constitutional rights, or of U.S. treaties or of law, or in case the nation is involved in the suit. Cases that involve different states' residents and maritime cases are tried in U.S. district courts as well. In case of criminal lawsuits, jurisdiction for hearing a case only occurs if the U.S. brings on the prosecution, or is a party in it (The 3 Levels of the Federal Court System: Structure and Organization - Video & Lesson Transcript -- Study.com, n.d). Judges decide law-related issues and juries (or even a judge) decide fact findings, in both criminal and civil cases. America has 94 District Courts; there are two or more District courts in each state. District Courts comprise of anywhere between 2 and 28 judges. District courts lack appellate jurisdiction, that is, they are not authorized to hear appeals from lower courts. The United States vs. Jose Hernandez case was only tried in Miami's Southern Florida District Court, owing to the fact that the U.S. was one party in the suit. Hernandez was accused, by the U.S., of borrowing several thousand dollars as educational loans, while failing to repay debts. American federal circuit courts…
Dual-court system represents a legal structure supporting 2 coexistent court systems, at local and national levels. Two among the world's oldest and most highly recognized dual-court systems can be found in Australia and the U.S. In both nations, state courts enforce local laws, while federal courts concurrently enforce national law. An extent of overlap exists, between the breadth and scope of nation and state laws; however, typically, the two court systems are completely independent of one another (What is a Dual Court System? (with pictures), n.d). The U.S. and Australian constitutions outline the standard federal law applicable to the nation overall. Federal courts largely aim at upholding and implementing constitutional mandates. Individual state governments are authorized to create their respective local laws applicable to state residents. While federal laws are invariably a minimum requirement, states can, under most circumstances, alter laws as they deem appropriate. Whereas laws of different states are often different, federal regulation is universally constant in all parts of the nation.
Three-Level Characteristic Federal Judiciary
References
(n.d.). Study.com -- Take Online Courses. Earn College Credit. Research Schools, Degrees & Careers. The 3 Levels of the Federal Court System: Structure and Organization - Video & Lesson Transcript -- Study.com. Retrieved March 24, 2016, from http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-3-levels-of-the-federal-court-system-structure-and-organization.html
(n.d.). WiseGEEK: clear answers for common questions. What is a Dual Court System? (with pictures). Retrieved March 24, 2016, from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-dual-court-system.htm
Court System The basic structure of the United States legal system comes from the Constitution. Constitutions are living documents that lay down principles and rules, as well as overall functions of how law should be used within society. Constitutions tend to be macro in scope, in that they define responsibilities between the three organs of U.S. Government (Judicial, Legislature and Executive). Laws are individual (micro) edicts that are made to define
offices in the judicial system, e.g. prosecutor, private attorney, public defender, and comparatively discuss the origin, development, behavior and relatedness of each to the other person would be considered till such a time, innocent of a crime, in the U.S. judicial system when he or she would be proved found guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers or common citizens. On the functioning of the
Partisan Politics At the time the U.S. Constitution was ratified, the new America of the 19th century saw its indigenes with varied political opinions. Those in favor of a powerful central government and therefore, a restraint of the powers the states possessed were part of the Federalist Party; those with the belief that interpretation should be given to the Constitution in order to reduce the powers the national government wields, which
prison system. This discussion is carried out in line with the observed cases of ethical, legal, and standards of practice considerations.The other issues addressed are the social and cultural composition of the population served and culturally sensitive practices, a theoretical framework that reflects the professional ethical codes of your field. Issues of informed consent and acknowledgement of client and patient rights, strategies to ensure confidentiality and potential problems that
(Restructuring California's School Finance System) The requirement of funds that the schools necessitate is also a matter of controversy attracting the attention of courts in California. The ACLU filed a writ petition of Williams et al. Vs. State of California et al. emphasizing that the state fails to meet the obligations in providing all students with basic educational necessities. The local school districts appearing the law suit of ACLU were
Smilla's Sense Of Snow: An icy reflection of the prejudice of the Danes against native Greenlanders The protagonist of Peter Hoeg's thriller Smilla's Sense of Snow is a product of a union between a native 'Greenlander' or indigenous person and a wealthy Danish doctor. Although the plot of the book is ostensibly a murder mystery it is just as much about Smilla's struggle for her identity. Smilla embarks upon her detective 'quest'