Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Aristotle and the Six Modes of Causation
In Book II, Part 3 of Aristotle's "Physics," the Greek philosopher Aristotle discusses different definitions or notions of causation, which form a four-tiered taxonomy of different, though somewhat overlapping types of causes. The first kind of cause is the cause of a thing's source. Next, is the cause of a thing's essence. Third and fourthly, there is that what gives something motion and also what gives it rest.
Aristotle also notes that although "the modes of causation are many" when brought under heads they too can be reduced in number to "six." Modes of causation are ways that things are caused, as opposed to the definition or taxonomy of the causes themselves. Of the first of these six modes of causation, the first is how one thing that may be prior to another, such as a doctor that is the cause of health. The second, contrasting mode of causation is the nature of a sculptor and a statue, which is caused by the maker.
The distinction between these two modes is quite evident -- for without a doctor, there may be 'health,' although the doctor may cause health in a sick...
However, without a sculptor, by definition, there would be no sculptor.
Then there are also "the classes in which the incidental attribute is included; thus a man could be said to be the cause of a statue or, generally, a living creature." Aristotle, in the third and fourth modes of causation thus discusses the different ways that modifications or adjectival descriptions of the modes of causation may be addressed. Thirdly, an incidental attribute too may be more or less remote to the subject-as-cause. For instance, "a pale man" or "a musical man" may be the cause of the statue. These adjectives may describe the cause, namely the man, but have nothing to do with his role as a sculptor or the construction of the end product of the statue. The specificity of how the cause is defined by the describer. However, some of these adjectival modifications about the sculptor may be incidental (significant) as remote (insignificant) in attribute. For instance, a sculptor who is "well-trained" could also make the statue, as well as a "pale man." The adjectival descriptions of significant and remote modifications thus, forms the third…
While the judges can be considered responsible for hamartia, Socrates himself is also accountable for hamartia when considering that he plays an important role in influencing the judges in wanting to put him to death. He actually has a choice, but he is reluctant to adopt an attitude that would induce feelings related to mercy. Ethos is also a dominant concept across Socrates' discourse, as he apparently believed that by influencing
It is therefore important to understand first off Aristotle's thoughts on human nature in order to understand his opinions on ethics and virtue. That human beings are social beings is something familiar to us nowadays as it was in Aristotle's time. Consequently, ethics and virtue were part of human nature and so every living being was supposed to live by what is righteous. This is another characteristic separating us from
Aristotle thought happiness was longer in coming, it was the manner of being actualized and fulfilling one's true potential using their own individual gifts: Again, if the virtues are concerned with actions and passions, and every passion and every action is accompanied by pleasure and pain, for this reason also virtue will be concerned with pleasures and pains. This is indicated also by the fact that punishment is indicated by
Likewise, a bronze statute is created by the 'being' in the world as a piece of metal, or the matter of the raw material. It is also dependent upon the sculptor's art, which is itself a product of the artist's ability: his human intelligence, craft, and ability to use his hands. However, although a dog may be bred to look a certain way, and to be a certain size, it
3. Aristotle's Theory of Change In his Theory of Change, Aristotle attempts to explore the nature of how ad why things evolve, or change in form from one object or concept to another. One of the greatest wonders of man, which is still even debates today, is he process of how things evolve to be. Well, Aristotle presented his Theory of Change to account for how and why objects develop into
slavery and citizenship in Aristotle's Politic: Aristotle believes that most people in the world can be enslaved devoid of injustice as they are born to be slaves. At the same time some are born to be free and dominate as masters. Most modern critics have smeared these concepts of Aristotle. In this paper the writer evaluates the concepts of citizenship and slavery in light of Aristotle's politic to reveal not