The hypothesis that certain black persons viewed racism as an all round phenomenon that occurs in many forms was tested. Other black persons viewed and experienced racism in many other different ways. This suggested that the act of racism is more in the mind of the specific victim than the actual fact in the objective reality. This highlighted out the fact that if white individuals were in the same environment with blacks, then the feeling of discrimination would be randomly experienced by the black persons. This and the fact that most of the reported racist cases are usually ambiguous highlights the fact that the opponents of the illegal immigration law of Arizona might be blinded by the fear in their minds that the actual reality on the ground which of course prompted the state to adopt the controversial piece of legislation. If a policeman would stop an individual on one of the Arizonian streets, it could be due to a variety of reasons. Of course one of them could be that he or she is not a member of your race! Certain foreign nations have already expressing their discontentment with the piece of legislation. It is therefore crucial for the federal government through the Supreme Court to come up with alternative techniques that are well researched and tested to deal with the issue of illegal immigrants.
A poll conducted by Gallup shown that more that three-quarters of the population in America were aware of the controversial Arizona immigration law with about 51% of them supporting its various draconian measures while about 39% being opposed to it (USAToday,2010).This is a very clear indication of the sort of problem the issue of illegal immigration is nationwide. While it is entirely normal for each and every American to enjoy their membership of particular states, it is important that structures be put in place to curtail the problems that are caused by racism.
United Sates of America is considered a model of democracy by various countries of the world. It is crucial for this image to remain this way. Otherwise its fame would quickly fade away as a result of pieces of legislations that apparently reflect a high level of lack of democracy. It actual appears that statutes contained in controversial legislations such as the illegal immigrants law are a direct opposite of the ideals that the U.S. government preaches to the rest of the world. The obvious reaction would be poor international relations which would then result in lowered ratings in terms of level of both diplomacy and democracy. T is important for the U.S. To ensure that ...
The statement by the Mexican President Calderon regarding the issue of illegal immigration and how they are improperly treated by the U.S. authorities show how much criticism the illegal immigration law has attracted. He reiterated the common views of the opponents of the law that it is a bad legislation and a terrible idea. He mainly focused his discernment on the fact that racial profiling was the main basis used in the enactment of the law. Another example of bad foreign relations between the U.S. And other countries are the various travel advisories that have been activated as a result of the bill. This is just an example of how this issue is sensitive in regard to the international relations between the United States of America and the rest of the world. It is therefore crucial that suitable amendments be made to the bill in order to accommodate views that are workable for both the nation and the illegal immigrants themselves
Alternative to the Arizonian Illegal immigration law
In order to decrease the public outcry on the issue of the illegal immigrants, it is essential for the U.S. government to come up with workable plans which involve no form of harassment and the violation of individual's rights. The plan should be based on a policy that involves non-prosecution. In case the illegal immigrants have been identified, it is appropriate for them to be processed and then either be absorbed or deported on the ground of their productivity and criminal history. It is worthwhile to ensure that the deportees are handed to their countries of origin in a coordinated exercise. When coining a more socially acceptable alternative to the Arizona immigration law, it is important to remember the theories of contradiction and containments of public administration as postulated by Box (2003). This is essential in order to capture the interest and fears of both the antagonists and protagonist of the immigration law.
Box, R (2003).Contradiction, Utopia and Public Administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis. Vol 25.No.2 -243-260
Gersen, K.J (1999). An Invitation to Social Construction. Sage Guhname (2010).The social construction of racism http://inductivist.blogspot.com/2010/05/social-construction-of-racism.html
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.(2007)Law Enforcement Policy on Racial Profiling
USAToday (2010).Poll: 51% of public supports Arizona immigration law .
Certain foreign nations have already expressing their discontentment with the piece of legislation. It is therefore crucial for the federal government through the Supreme Court to come up with alternative techniques that are well researched and tested to deal with the issue of illegal immigrants.
Arizona Immigration Law SB1070 This work in writing examines Arizona's SB1070 Immigration Law and how this law has impacted the state of Arizona, the citizens of Arizona, and the U.S. In its entirety as well as the conflicting views on SB1070 and seeks to determine is SB1070 is adherent to the tenants of federal immigration law. Arizona Immigration Law SB1070 The objective of this work in writing is to briefly explain Arizona's SB1070
Arizona SB 1070 On January 13, 2010 Senator Russell Pearce, representative of District 18 in Mesa, introduced Senate Bill 1070 which stated as it's intent to make attrition through enforcement the public policy of the state of Arizona. In support of this goal, the state would seek to enforce all federal immigration laws in an effort to deter "the unlawful entry and presence of illegal aliens and economic activity by illegal
Arizona's new immigration law is a fundamental violation of the principles of the Civil Rights Act of 1994, and existing federal non-discrimination legislation. The law enables police to randomly stop and demand proof of citizenship from people who the authorities think are illegal aliens. This law will obviously have a disproportionate impact upon individuals of non-white heritage, particularly Hispanics. The law "would make the failure to carry immigration documents a
They point out that neither the Constitution nor the Supreme Court has precluded the States or localities from enforcing the criminal provisions of immigration law. Because the enforcement of the criminal provisions of Federal Law has not been expressly prohibited by the Constitution, it would be reserved to the states respectively. According to the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
Arizona illegal immigrant law a good idea? The Support Our Police force and Safe Neighbourhood Act (enacted as Arizona Senate Bill 1070 and therefore is associated basically as Arizona SB 1070) is really a legal Act within the U.S. Arizona State. This law is currently the widest and most stringent anti-illegal immigration in recent American history (CNN, 2010). This law has acquired considerable local and also global criticism and it
Immigration Political Issue The United States have long battle immigration issues over the years with immigrants who take whatever measures necessary to make it to the United States. They take boats, hike across the border at night, are smuggled across the border in vehicles and are stow away on vessels and trains. This paper will present a discussion on the current laws regarding immigration with a particular focus on the role