The Armin Meiwes Cannibalism Case Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1019
Cite
Related Topics:

One of the fundamental taboos that has characterized the human condition since time immemorial is eating human flesh. Although some primitive societies have engaged in the practice – and some purportedly still do – the proscription against cannibalism is so ubiquitous and powerful that national governments have not felt compelled to enact legislation outlawing the practice because existing laws concerning murder and the longstanding natural prohibitions against eating other people are regarded as being sufficient. Indeed, even in extreme cases such as the stranded Donner party where survival was at stake, cannibalism is universally regarded as morally and legally wrong. It was against this backdrop that the gruesome circumstances that involved Armin Meiwes, a middle-aged German man was convicted by German courts of recruiting a consensual volunteer on a fetish Web site strictly for the purposes of butchering and eating him. To gain some insights into this event, this paper examines the facts about this case to determine why and what happened as well as how it happened and what occurred afterwards. Finally, a summary of the research and key findings about the Meiwes cannibalism case are presented in the conclusion. Review and Discussion

The facts of this case are not in dispute. The legal record shows that Armin Meiwes was a quiet, otherwise-pleasant 42-year-old German man from Rotenburg described by local residents who knew him casually as “the perfect neighbor” who, in 2001, located an individual, a 43-year-old engineer...

...

While this mutually agreed upon arrangement seems truly bizarre on its face (and it was), the grisly story does not end there. As part of their mutual agreement, Brandes also agreed to be butchered and eaten by Meiwes, which the latter proceeded to do, freezing part of the body for later consumption (Harding, 2003).
Following a period of several months, Meiwes was subsequently arrested by German police and was charged and convicted for manslaughter, despite the absence of German laws against cannibalism per se (Cannibalism overview, 2018) At the prosecutor’s request, Meiwes received a retrial at which point he was convicted of murder for “the purposes of sexual pleasure and fro disturbing the peace of the dead” (Harding, 2003). In his explanation for this gruesome series of events, Meiewes simply advised that court on the first day of his murder trial that after the death of his mother in 1999, eating a person became an obsession. In this regard, Meiwes stated that, “I always had the fantasy and in the end I fulfilled it” (as cited in Harding, 2003, para. 3).

While these details are sufficiently abhorrent to shock even jaded observers, the actual events that transpired following the recruitment of a willing subject were even more bizarre and blood-curdling. For example, according to Harding, “In March 2001 Meiwes advertised on the internet for…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Cannibalism overview. (2018). Cornell Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/cannibalism.

Harding, L. (2003, December 3). Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding.

Sheinman, H. (2011). Promises and agreements: Philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.



Cite this Document:

"The Armin Meiwes Cannibalism Case" (2018, February 23) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/armin-meiwes-cannibalism-case-essay-2167039

"The Armin Meiwes Cannibalism Case" 23 February 2018. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/armin-meiwes-cannibalism-case-essay-2167039>

"The Armin Meiwes Cannibalism Case", 23 February 2018, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/armin-meiwes-cannibalism-case-essay-2167039

Related Documents

Question 5: Since the events of September 11th, terrorism has been a crucial concern for Americans specifically, and the global society in general. As Wilkins (2005) notes, although it is generally agreed to be justifiable to commit violence in the act of self-defense against aggressors, many of the victims of terrorism are innocent of any crime, and that the question of "collective guilt" must come into play when determining the justification for

Although the circularity of the logic of insanity as demonstrated by the very fact that a man desires to be eaten (because he is insane, because he wants to be eaten, because he is insane…) loses credibility due to the redundancy of such thinking, the implicit conclusion that the author comes to regarding this matter, "if every person with emotional problems were denied the right to determine what is