Bae Systems Financial Analysis As Thesis

58 ROA. On ROE the transition from 20.22 in 2005, to 47.16 in 2006, 17.78 in 2007, and 26.19 in 2008 also illustrates how the overall performance of cost efficiency measures based on process performance significantly improved the performance of the company over time. Finally on ROI, the company increased most consistently on this metric. From 6.57 in 2005, to 7.84 in 2006, 10.38 in 2007, to 13.79 in 2008, the ROI performance has been one of the most consistent over time for the company. This has been anchored in the asset utilization strategies the company continues to pursue and the decision to become an outsource provider on selected processes and systems that are routine and easily controlled for variation (Feeny, Lacity, Willcocks, 2005). When all of these factors are taken into account it is clear to see how BAE Systems has continually excelled across competitive product categories and also in very competitive geographies as well. Conclusion

Based on the high level of internal process efficiencies, alignment of R&D to core defense markets globally and dominance of the American aerospace and defense market, it is recommended that £.1B be invested in BAE Systems. There are several factors that contribute to this decision. First, the company is attaining performance levels that are exceptional compared to the industry. They have attained this by concentrating on making lean production and Six Sigma engrained into their culture. As the assessment of competitive strengths indicates in this analysis, the company also has a defensible advantage in the market given its level of R&D investment and financial strength in terms of profitability as asset utilization. Further, the ROE and ROI analyses indicate upward trending of asset utilization and indicate Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is also increasing given the increasing ROI levels as well. Finally the company is well positioned to take advantage of strategic acquisitions and the rising level of global defense spending occurring it is most dominant segments of the market. Finally the quality assurance and ECQM initiatives have given the company the ability to withstand competitive threats in their most critical key accounts. This has become a contributor to the stabilization of their services annuity revenue streams. With all these factors considered and the analysis presented in this report, it is recommended that an investment be made in BAE Systems.

References

John Addey. 2001. Quality management system design: A visionary approach. Total Quality Management 12, no. 7,8, (December 1): 849-854.

Botta, R., and A. Bahill. 2007. A Prioritization Process. Engineering Management Journal 19, no. 4, (December 1): 20-27.

Card, D., K. Domzalski, and G. Davies. 2008. Making Statistics Part of Decision Making in an Engineering Organization. IEEE Software 25, no. 3, (May 1): 37-47.

David Feeny, Mary Lacity, and Leslie P. Willcocks. 2005. Taking the Measure of Outsourcing Providers. MIT Sloan Management Review 46, no. 3, (April 1): 41-48.

BAE looks to fighter jets for growth. 2009. FT.com, November 8, 2009/

Mostafa Jazayeri and Robert W. Scapens. 2008. The Business Values Scorecard within BAE Systems: The evolution of a performance measurement system. The British Accounting Review 40, no. 1, (March 1): 48-70.

Appendix A

2007-2009 Comparative Analysis

Quick Ratio

Current Ratio

Earnings Before Tax Margin %

EBITDA Margin %

Gross Margin %

Inventory Turnover

Net Profit Margin %

Operating Margin %

ROA % (Net)

ROE % (Net)

ROI % (Operating)

Revenue per Employee

Year: 2009

Peer Avg: 0.73

Peer Avg: 1.15

Peer Avg: 10.57

Peer Avg: 14.04

Peer Avg: 16.35

Peer Avg: 21.10

Peer Avg: 6.51

Peer Avg: 8.61

Peer Avg: 5.87

Peer Avg: 24.16

Peer Avg: 22.73

Peer Avg: 293957.33

BAE Systems Plc

0.84

1.09

20.73

28.54

29.78

15.25

11.22

11.04

38.16

20.1

EADS N.V. (France)

0.48

1.53

23.78

3.15

5.08

7.67

2.89

18.04

19.67

General Dynamics Corp.

0.91

1.15

12.3

14.55

12.47

16.01

8.39

12.47

9.06

22.48

25.44

$316,576

Lockheed Martin Corp.

0.71

1.01

10.33

11.61

10.88

23.54

7.53

12.01

10.29

50.64

49.01

$291,878

Northrop Grumman Corp

0.73

0.97

...

(France)
0.48

1.53

23.78

3.15

5.08

7.67

2.89

18.04

19.67

General Dynamics Corp.

0.91

1.15

12.3

14.55

12.47

16.01

8.39

12.47

9.06

22.48

25.44

$316,576

Lockheed Martin Corp.

0.71

1.01

10.33

11.61

10.88

23.54

7.53

12.01

10.29

50.64

49.01

$291,878

Northrop Grumman Corp

0.73

0.97

-1.09

1.47

18.26

33

-3.72

-0.33

-3.96

-8.5

-0.59

$273,418

Quick Ratio

Current Ratio

Earnings Before Tax Margin %

EBITDA Margin %

Gross Margin %

Inventory Turnover

Net Profit Margin %

Operating Margin %

ROA % (Net)

ROE % (Net)

ROI % (Operating)

Revenue per Employee

Year: 2007

Peer Avg: 0.87

Peer Avg: 1.33

Peer Avg: 11.70

Peer Avg: 16.15

Peer Avg: 14.30

Peer Avg: 25.34

Peer Avg: 6.28

Peer Avg: 8.19

Peer Avg: 6.64

Peer Avg: 19.32

Peer Avg: 17.77

Peer Avg: 295466.67

BAE Systems Plc

1.21

1.49

17.29

29.21

52.31

12.61

11.44

9.4

35.62

20.79

EADS N.V. (France)

0.53

1.66

16.25

3.22

-1.68

-2.11

-0.89

-4.99

-4.48

General Dynamics Corp.

1.1

1.34

11.19

13.53

11.43

17.55

7.61

11.43

8.61

19.19

22.92

$326,228

Lockheed Martin Corp.

0.77

1.11

9.95

10.69

10.11

24.81

7.25

10.81

10.61

36.35

35.46

$299,014

Northrop Grumman Corp

0.74

1.05

8.39

11.16

19.41

28.81

5.59

9.39

5.48

10.44

14.14

$261,158

Appendix B

BAE Systems PLC Ratio Analysis (1999-2008)

Profitability Ratios

12/31/2008

12/31/2007

12/31/2006

12/31/2005

12/31/2004

12/31/2003

12/31/2002

12/31/2001

12/31/2000

12/31/1999

ROA % (Net)

7.58

4.69

8.52

3.03

0.04

-4.18

-0.77

-0.07

2.45

ROE % (Net)

26.19

17.78

47.16

20.22

0.11

-11.14

-1.94

-0.18

6.91

ROI % (Operating)

13.79

10.38

7.84

6.57

3.08

-4.18

4.1

1.78

7.52

EBITDA Margin %

19.58

14.58

10.39

11.02

11.15

Calculated Tax Rate %

25.43

27.13

24.8

16.24

26.88

EBT

Cite this Document:

"Bae Systems Financial Analysis As" (2009, November 23) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bae-systems-financial-analysis-as-17139

"Bae Systems Financial Analysis As" 23 November 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bae-systems-financial-analysis-as-17139>

"Bae Systems Financial Analysis As", 23 November 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bae-systems-financial-analysis-as-17139

Related Documents

BSC Analysis BAE Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Implementation Facing the daunting challenge of staying competitive in rapidly consolidating industry segments of aerospace, defense and commercial aircraft components and assembly manufacturing and service, senior management at BAE Systems chose to completely re-architect the company. The comprehensive change programme included dismantling the global conglomerate and replacing its structure with a series of interlocking businesses that would strengthen and support each other, generating greater competitive

market capitalization of 23.011 billion, Boeing is the nation's largest producer of commercial aircraft and the world's leading aerospace company. It operates in four principal segments: Commercial Airplanes, Military Aircraft and Missile Systems, Space and Communications, and Boeing Capital Corporation. As the world's market for air travel fluctuates with the risk of war, so do Boeing's revenues. However, as the United States moves towards a footing that may include

For example, there are many SEC registered companies, and they are not all American companies. Many of them are actually headquartered in foreign countries. In the past they had to change their accounting and financial information over to GAAP requirements, but changes are allowing companies to continue to use IFRS instead. Some of the U.S. based companies are also going to be allowed to use IFRS in order to

These stakeholders are also vital in the promotion of the application of standards-based technology. This is critical as it enhances the safety and security of the citizens as they pursue low-cost health care services and products within the context of the United States. The federal and state governments have also been influential in the development and implementation of policies towards addressing security and privacy issues in relation to the utilization

Lessons Learned From the Balanced Scorecard Implementation at BAE BAE Systems competes in several of the most complex, capital- and knowledge-intensive areas of the aerospace and defense industry making each of their product lines and divisions highly dependent on accuracy, efficiency and quality management. For BAE Systems, ensuring exceptional orchestration of each aspect of a project is essential for their growth and continued viability as a business. From their aerospace product

The company conducts research and development on several programs such as on-site warfare testing, and laboratory research for the next generation aircrafts. The company also conducts R&D on the application of new technologies to build aircraft and submarines as well as implementing effective R&D on mechanical and electrical system for the new equipment. Despite the competitive strategic advantages that the company is enjoying, there are external environment affecting the business