Berger's "Sacred Canopy," And Freud's "The Future Term Paper

Berger's "Sacred Canopy," and Freud's "The Future of an illusion" are both secular theories of religion. Berger's theory is based on a sociological understanding of human nature, while Freud's analysis is based largely upon his psychoanalytical theories. Both theories feel that the human fear of the terror of nature and death are at the root of the phenomenon of religion. In "The Sacred canopy: elements of a sociological theory of religion," Berger seeks to understand religion through a sociological framework. His theory of religion is based on the premise that "every human society is an enterprise of world-building" (Berger). As such, Berger explains that our perceived world is constantly being created through what he refers to as a dialectical process. This process has three key aspects: externalization, objectivation, and internalization. In externalization, our thoughts become translated into the products we make and the actions that we take. When the products of our thoughts appear in the outside world (are externalized) they then influence us by shaping our behaviors and future thoughts (internalization).

In simpler terms, Berger argues that we have an internal representation of reality. Our actions and the objects that we create reflect this internal world. What we create then feeds back to us, and we ultimately become the passive subjects of what we have created (or externalized). We generally lack awareness of this process because it is a collective undertaking. World building occurs at the societal and social level, and is so complex that it is difficult to discern or interpret from the point-of-view of a single individual.

In short,...

...

He argues that humans have created religion and sacredness in order to protect against the harsh realities of the natural world. As such, he sees religion as a sort of shield against existential terrors, or a sacred canopy.
This sacred canopy is maintained by the human social order, an objectification. This social order, with the church as the key institution, then serves to justify our internal beliefs about the external world.

Berger then delves into the phenomenon of secularization. He argues that the rational, mechanistic world that we live in has reduced the social plausibility of the sacred, and of religion. In other words, as our external world and our institutions have changed, this has caused our internal reality to change as well. In our day-to-day lives, we now think in secular terms, and the sacred canopy is now disintegrating. We no longer have religion to protect us against the harsh realities of the external world.

In "The Future of an illusion" Freud placed religion in the larger context of human culture and made it accessible to scientific investigation as any other human behavior or phenomenon. Freud felt that religion was essentially based in the human need to reduce the feeling of helplessness when man confronted the cruelties of nature, including death. " Religious ideas have sprung from the same need as all the other achievements of culture: from the necessity for defending itself against the crushing supremacy of nature" (Freud).…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Berger, Peter L. The Sacred canopy: elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1967.

Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an illusion. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1964.


Cite this Document:

"Berger's Sacred Canopy And Freud's The Future" (2002, October 18) Retrieved May 1, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/berger-sacred-canopy-and-freud-the-future-136897

"Berger's Sacred Canopy And Freud's The Future" 18 October 2002. Web.1 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/berger-sacred-canopy-and-freud-the-future-136897>

"Berger's Sacred Canopy And Freud's The Future", 18 October 2002, Accessed.1 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/berger-sacred-canopy-and-freud-the-future-136897

Related Documents

Freud Civilization and Its Discontents Humankind strives for happiness, but according to Sigmund Freud, the creation of civilization as a means to further this goal has instead generated unhappiness. In his book Civilization and its Discontents, Freud asserts the happiness of the individual is often sublimated to the need for civilization to establish law and order. People have an instinctual desire for absolute freedom which includes a need to be sexually

Sigmund Freud I have chosen to write my I-search paper about Sigmund Freud, known today as the father of psychoanalysis. He has impacted our society a great deal and this is obvious when you simply open up a psychology textbook. This semester I am taking a psychology course and we talk about him a lot. I have learned, not only through my psychology course, but also through my dad who majored

And moreover, the virtues that had been "automatically" accorded to Freud over the years -- "clinical acumen, wisdom in human affairs, dedication to his patients and to the truth" -- are now obscured by the skepticism that has come due to the deep questioning and investigation over time (Kramer, 1998, pp. 199-200). That skepticism among scholars has also been brought on by a lack of "accord" between what Freud

Freud's invention, 'psychoanalysis', wherein the patient would be encouraged by the doctor to talk freely about his varied memories and dreams and associations and thoughts, which became an important part of the psychiatric treatment of patients suffering from mental illnesses, in later years, was, when first introduced in the Vienna of the end of the century, openly ridiculed. When Freud's 'Interpretation of Dreams' was released, there was a commotion as

The personal and scientific environments within which Freud grew up therefore represent his primary influences. A further influence came in the form of physics. The second half of the nineteenth century, during which Freud did most of his important work, saw great advances in physics. According to Thornton, the discovery mostly responsible for this was Helmholz's principle of conservation energy. Helmholz held that the total amount of energy in a

116). By defining these elements, he constructs a safe model that only applies to his people. Still it was this premise of the potential illness found in the Jewish male that shaped "the discourse of psychoanalysis concerning gender and identity. The next step in his revolutionary study came with defining his style of psychology. He believed in determination as a construct. This was defined; as one's action is causally determined