Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Teachers can raise issues related to race, class, gender, religion, and power in a sensitive, culturally competent manner and then perhaps create lessons that encourage students to explore their own backgrounds and identities. However, when individual students or a group of students are unaware of some aspects of their identity, teachers have a tougher job.
In many cases, those aspects of a student's identity that he or she does not recognize will not be related to race, class, gender, or power. They may be personality traits or biases. In other cases, students might echo the prejudicial beliefs of their parents. Teachers have a responsibility to expose prejudice and bias for what they are, but in a way that does not offend students. As students mature and reach puberty, issues related to sexual identity and gender orientation will come up, further complicating teachers' responsibilities to their students.
3. What might be the ramifications of a teacher not recognizing aspects of his or her own identity?
The ramifications of a teacher not recognizing aspects of his or her own identity are often insignificant: such as personality quirks or eccentricities. Students and coworkers might whisper behind that teacher's back because of the hidden aspects of identity,...
The teacher might dress funny or say certain things that betray their identities even though those quirks are ironically hidden from the teacher.
However, aspects of a teacher's identity that are repressed or denied can emerge in more serious ways such as in biases in lessons and curricula. The teacher could select material that reflected his or her subconscious identity without knowing. That part of the teacher's identity might coincide with prejudices or biases. The teacher might unconsciously omit lessons on areas that betray their identity but not realize they are doing so.
The teacher might even treat students differently because of those objective facets of identity that the teacher is yet to be aware of. Much of the racism and prejudice against other cultures or sexual orientations extant today are due to aspects of identity that are apparent to outsiders but not to the individual. Regardless of whether they are malicious or not, parts of the teacher's identity that are hidden from him or her are bound to affect the way that professional communicates and acts. If the teacher is experiencing an identity crisis, then the ramifications of not recognizing aspects of identity could require some time off from teaching.
Deception A) How are the contexts and deceptions different? In the two articles, "Lying for Love in the Modern Age, Deception in Online Dating" and "Exoneration of Serious Wrongdoing via Confession to a Lesser Offense," the two authors describe different ways in which people lie to one another in the modern world. The major difference between the two presented categories of deception is the way in which it affects others. "Lying for
If an individual is cognizant of their actions and demonstrate a level of regret directed toward their behavior or its implications, does this suggest the individual is truly aware of their behavior (i.e. The theoretical "information" defined earlier) and therefore incapable of engaging in "self-deception" at this point? This is a deeply philosophical question to answer, one that escapes the confines of what is analyzed here; however in addressing this
Benefits could also be perceived on a more individual level, in that participants receive financial compensation for their involvement in the study. III. DECEPTION in RESEARCH Laura Stark (2005, p. 2) recognizes that there has been tension in psychology research between the moral abhorrence associated with deception in research, and the perception of its necessity. According to Stark (p. 3), the federal government realized the necessity of regulation in terms of
He quotes the claims that they customarily begin with the demand "If you know what's good for you, you'll confess," and cites various experts in criminal law enforcement who state that police "con" and "bull*****" their suspects, that they use coercion, deception and are not willing to change. He counters this last assertion by claiming that historically, American police have made radical changes in their tactics and must certainly
Benedick pretended not to know who Benedick was but he was apparently unsuccessful since Beatrice insulted him by calling him 'the prince's jester' among many other insults. Benedick's conversations with Claudio and Don Pedro indicated that he had been very hurt by Beatrice's comments. This provided another clue to his real feelings for Beatrice and his reasons for trying to hide his true from her identity behind the mask.
Deception has been utilized as one of the most valuable tools in investigative processes by law enforcement officers. This tool has been utilized in the criminal justice field for more than a century because of the view that its useful in helping investigative officers in uncovering the truth. As a result, investigative officers commonly utilize deception to conduct investigations, interrogations and in the testimonial process to help uncover the truth