Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Blindness in King Lear
In William Shakespeare's play King Lear, common notions of sight and blindness are complicated and subverted the story of the Earl of Gloucester, who has his eyes gouged out following his betrayal at the hands of his illegitimate son Edmund. When he is able to physically see, Gloucester is blinded by the machinations of Edmund, Goneril, and Regan, and it is only when he is blinded does he come to understand the reality of the situation. By examining the first scene of Edmund's scheming against Gloucester and Edgar, Cornwall's gouging of Gloucester's eyes, and Gloucester's eventual death at the climax of the play, one may see how the play warns against the illusory nature of appearances and the unreliability of sight, a warning made implicitly in the central plot through Goneril and Regan's false proclamations of love for Lear but demonstrated explicitly in the parallel story of Gloucester and his sons.
The centrality of sight and blindness in Gloucester's story comes when Edmund forges a letter supposedly in Edgar's handwriting professing a desire to murder Gloucester and divide his property. Edmund plays at hiding the letter from Gloucester in order to appear reluctant to incriminate his brother Edgar, but Gloucester insists on seeing it, telling Edmund "Let's see: come / if it be nothing, I shall not need spectacles" (1.2.34-5). Thus, Gloucester reveals his weakness by insinuating that truth, or at least information worth knowing, is centrally obtained through sight.
Edmund uses this to his advantage by playing on Gloucester's reliance on vision as the primary means of...
Of course, Gloucester's reliance on sight is immediately shown to be useless, as he is unable to tell that the letter is a forgery and must rely on Edmund to determine whether or not it is actually written in Edgar's handwriting (1.2.64). Even the subsequent contrasting conceptions of Nature expressed by Gloucester and Edmund reveal Gloucester's weakness for vision, because he believes the obscuration of light in the form of lunar and solar eclipses are the cause of the recent treachery and injustice seen in the play (1.2.106-7).
Ironically, Gloucester's overreliance on sight leads to his blinding; his utter credulity regarding Edmund's forgery and performances leads him straight into the hands of Regan and Cornwall. However, this scene also foreshadows Gloucester's eventual triumph, because although he is physically blinded this scene marks the beginning of Gloucester truly "seeing" the truth, and when considered alongside a later scene demonstrates Gloucester's evolution from one who favors sight but is blind to the truth to a character who is physically blind but blessed with the light of truth (another of the paradoxical dichotomies in the play, such as the Fool's wisdom or Lear's reasonable madness).
With the reality of Regan and Cornwall's treachery revealed to him, Gloucester states that "I shall see / The…
Work Cited
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. The Play's the Thing. 2009. Web. 18 Jul 2011.
For that reason, going mad is the perfect punishment. He led his mind into falsehoods through anger, and his mind essentially rebelled. In this light, it is somewhat ironic when Cordelia -- whose banishment was the source for Lear's madness, in this reading -- exclaims "he was met even now / As mad as the vexed sea" (IV, iv, 1-2). His madness brings her compassion, and ultimately his salvation. Just
Because justice is not administered according to moral arguments -- Lear also argues that since laws are made by the same people, they cannot be moral ones -- it is reduced to who holds power at a given moment in time. Similarly, the death of Lear's daughter, Cordelia, at the end of the play suggests that not even the gods or the divine powers which rule the universe have
King Lear stands as an excellent example of one Shakespeare's tragedies, and in certain senses it is the most obviously "classical" in its sense of tragedy. The basic plot of the play involves Lear, who is the aging King, deciding to step down and divide his kingdom between his daughters, Regan, Goneril, and Cordelia according to their willingness to declare their love for him. While Regan and Goneril willingly
Shakespeare spent much of his literary career writing wonderfully descriptive plays that not only entertained in his time, as well as ours, but also managed to teach lessons or morals to the audience. King Lear is no exception - there is meaningless violence that strips the world of justice and good, and the foolish (King Lear and Gloucester) are left with the realization of what they have done, and the
Edward bond's lear vs. shakespeare's king lear Political Potential Influenced by Betrolt Brecht Plot: Beginning of Transformation Marxism in Lear Governments into Power Christike Political Figure Governmental Autocratic Attitudes Epic Theatre: Political Effect on Audience Patriarchal Constraints Cultural Power Political Repercussions edward bond's lear Vs. shakespeare's king lear Lear was a play that was produced back in 1971 and it was not just any play. Lear had three-act and it was created by the British dramatist Edward Bond. Many considered it to be
Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King Lear Adapting Lear for modern audiences: Edward Bond's Lear vs. Shakespeare's King Lear Shakespeare's King Lear is considered one of the greatest tragedies of human literature, as it grapples with the question of the nature of humanity, human goodness, and the purpose of life. Lear is envisioned as an existentialist hero in some modern adaptations of the play, although for many years the mad king and his