Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Appointment of Judges to Canada's Supreme Court
The current democratic governance system in Canada permits the federal Cabinet and the Prime Minister to appoint judges to the country's Supreme Court.[footnoteRef:2] As the appointments are formalized through the Governor General, the Supreme Court is the final and highest court in the Canadian justice system. Based on the current system, Canada's general parliament, provincial legislatures, and citizens do not participate in the process of appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. Actually, the Governor General makes final appointment of these judges on behalf of the cabinet and advice of the Prime Minister. This process of appointment of judges to Canada's highest court is based on the Supreme Court Act, which was enacted by the federal government in line with its constitutional authority. [2: Wendy Tso, "Judicial Appointments and Independence," Centre for Constitutional Studies -- University of Alberta, accessed February 24, 2016, http://ualawccsprod.srv.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/issues/judicialappointmentsandindependence.php]
The current process of appointment of judges to Canada's Supreme Court has attracted criticisms given confusion on who actually appoints the judges. Even though it's the entire Cabinet involved in this process, there are suggestions that the Prime Minister is solely responsible...
Since the current process does not involve the participation of the general cabinet, provincial legislatures and citizens, it has been criticized for lack of transparency. The other issue that has characterized this process is concerns that there is increased likelihood of the appointments to be partisan and politicized in order to conform to the ruling party's agenda. These issues are exacerbated by the lack of formal constraints and seeming lack of judicial independence. The lack of judicial independence is attributable to the likelihood of the Prime Minister to appoint judges who lean towards the political philosophy of his/her party. Actually, the process of appointing Supreme Court judges in Canada is sometimes considered as an opportunity to give jobs to political friends.
In light of this discussion, there is an increased need to reform this process in order to enhance civic participation and judicial independence. The inconsistencies of the process have not only been historical issues but have also attracted considerable attention in the recent past as evidenced in political debate and public scrutiny. Reforming this process of appointment will help Canada to stop utilizing a closed and discretionary process for appointing judges to its highest court. Moreover, reforms would help the country maintain its high regard among the…
Bibliography
British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. "Judicial Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada." The Law Foundation of British Columbia, last modified June 10, 2004. https://bccla.org/our_work/judicial-appointments-to-the-supreme-court-of-canada/
Tso, Wendy. "Judicial Appointments and Independence." Centre for Constitutional Studies-
University of Alberta, accessed February 24, 2016. http://ualawccsprod.srv.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/issues/judicialappointmentsandindependence.php
" The bill then goes on a calendar, so it can be debated, discussed, or amended. The bill then goes to the floor of the house where it is read, discussed, and voted on. If it passes by a two-thirds margin, it goes on to the Senate, where it goes through the same process. If it makes it this far, it is "enrolled," signed by the Speaker of the House
Meech Lake Accords In order to properly examine the Meech Lake Accords and their significance, we must look first at why the Accords were necessary and what led up to them. Until 1982, Canada had been governed by the British North America Act, passed by the British Parliament in 1867. This act provided for the unification of the Canadian provinces into the Dominion of Canada, and set out the powers
Corruption Anti-Corruption No one is immune from the power of corruption. Of course there are orders of magnitude and people can be corrupted in little ways that do not seem to matter, but many times the people that are corrupted are the very ones who are supposed to be manning the public trust. The very people citizens hope are the most incorruptible are, unfortunately, the most susceptible. Lord Acton said that "Power
Infanticide in Australia Infanticide is the act or practice of killing newborns or infants. It has been committed or performed in every continent and in every level of culture from the poorest hunters and gatherers to the richest and most advanced classes of people and from the time of our ancestors to modern age (Milner 1998). The act or practice has been so rampant that there is enough evidence on record
Political Science: First InitialQuestion 2The interest groups try to affect the judicial system in three ways: lobbying on judicial confirmations, filing amicus curiae briefs, and sponsoring litigation[footnoteRef:1]. Lobbying on the judicial confirmations includes knowing who would become the court judge to influence the court case and their decisions could be made. Appointing a suitable judge on this position costs millions of dollars to those who want to have their judge
Layne', in December 1994, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner received a compliant that the Vancouver Police Department had taken a decision to block out the faces of those person who were being interviewed by the police in the program, "To Serve and to Protect." The complainant was KF Media Inc., of Vancouver B.C. KF Media Inc. who was the producer of the program, and it generally