¶ … Oil Hinder Democracy?
The problem entails whether oil has a detrimental effect on democracy. Specifically, the author investigates whether a country that is rich in oil tends to be "poor" democracy. As reason for this inquiry, the author notes a number of examples of countries that are rich in oil but not in democracy. Oil exporters like Nigeria, Indonesia, Venzeula, and states in Central Asia are mentioned as particular examples of countries that are rich in oil resources but that have nonetheless not become democratic.
The author identifies three areas to position the main research question, which is whether oil impedes democracy. The first aspect regards the validity of the claim and asks "is it true?" As part of this question, the author asks whether the negative influence of oil on democracy is consistent even once certain variables are taken into account. The second question regards the generality of the claim along the geographic and the sectoral dimensions. Specifically, the question regards whether all oil-rich countries have a poor democracy record, and whether other minerals than oil have the same effect in these countries.
3.
The author notes that most literature of the past has focused on the Middle East and North Africa when investigating the inverse effects of oil and democracy on each other. While he does not outright deny the validity of the claims being investigated, he notes that more investigation is necessary before the literature and its claims can be taken at face value.
4.
The author appears to lean towards the hypothesis that oil indeed does have an...
To prove this, he investigates three potential causal mechanisms, including the rentier effect, the repression effect, and the modernization effect. The author appears of the intention to use these effects as an explanation of the apparent link between rich oil exports and authoritarian rule in the states in question.
5.
In order to investigate the hypothesis, the author has created a numerical model in order to determine the various effects of five causal variables that have been robust determinants of democracy in previous studies. Variables that determine the oil and mineral wealth of states are also included in the equation.
6.
Data include a pooled time-series cross-national data set. Data from all sovereign states that have a population of more than one hundred thousand persons between 1971 and 1997 were collected. To fit into the model equation being used, the data were numerical.
7.
The first, and most important, main finding is that the author proves the hypothesis that oil hurts democracy. After applying the model and investigating the data, the author finds that the data prove both valid and statistically robust in terms of the claim. It is also found that the damage created by oil is greater in poor countries than in rich ones in terms of hurting the democracy. The second main finding is that the harm created by oil is not only apparent in the Middle East; all countries with rich oil resources suffer in terms of democracy. Third, the authors have found that not only oil, but other mineral wealth is also detrimental to democracy. Fourth, the…
Combat and Substance Abuse Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as a consequence of combat experience, is believed to be a significant risk factor for substance abuse. This theory has been undermined to some extent by recent findings which suggest mental illness, apart from PTSD, may be a stronger predictor. Although combat-related PTSD may significantly contribute to the prevalence of substance abuse among veterans, the dominant substance abuse risks are the same for
Integration - Causal Chains and Strategy SLP The balanced scorecard approach is a useful tool, applicable to most organizations for identifying strategic action plans. One of the most important advantages for a balanced scorecard is that it is able to provide information in a synthetic manner, making it easy to digest for decision makers, who often don't have the time to analyze all the deeper details, especially when the decision sometimes
Hume and the Lack of a Causal Link Between Our Known Experiences and the Existence of a Supreme Being The "here and now": That is what concerns David Hume. There is simply no value in discussing such amorphous intangibles as one can infer from "the course of nature." More precisely, humans -- of them, philosophers -- cannot and should not be enticed to "regulate" their "conduct" by parameters such as the
Balanced Scorecard Integration - Causal Chains and Strategy-case The Balanced Scorecard in Technology Organizations The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a tactical performance management approach, which allows organizations to manage and determine the delivery of their strategy. The objective of the BSC was to show that the assessment of the organization should not be restricted to traditional evaluation methods, but supplement the organization with measures about customer satisfaction, internal process, innovation, and overall strategic
Montefiore Medical Center (MMC): A Case Study This study reviews a Harvard Business School case on Montefoire Care Centers. The Balanced Scorecard is chosen for the strategic management initiative at Montefoire and the reasons and results of such a choice is reviewed in this case study. The objective of this study is to answer the question of what were the underlying reasons for the development of a new strategy at Montefiore Medical
Hume and Experience In morals, politics, religion and science, Hume was a conservative empiricist who emphatically rejected all theories he thought of as metaphysical or not based on actual experience and sense perceptions. He did not regard religious and metaphysical theories as scientific, but more like idle speculation, superstition and prejudice. No ultimate original principles existed outside of the mind and perceptions, and this certainly included the concept of cause and