Vietnam War has gone down in history as one of the worst war efforts made by the United States for its sheer cost in human capital and the collective sanity of the nation. While many social and psychological issues can be cited as bearing the blame for the atrocity that was this war, one major challenge was the basic lack of communication and consistency among the levels of command. Individual soldiers, for example, were given commands and rules of engagement without really being informed of the rationale behind these (Close Air Support, 2014). Furthermore, there was no debate among the various levels of command regarding the best way forward in terms of rules of engagement. Those in the midst of battle were not free to proceed according to the demands of the situation; they were basically bound by the theories and ideals of those in command, including those in the White House.
The most challenging level of ROE is probably at the individual...
In the case of Vietnam, the lack of consistent policy created significant difficulty for soldiers in the field, who were required to respond to specific situations at a moment's notice. At the receiving end of the chain of command, soldiers in the field knew little about the political agenda behind the ROE and were only given commands on an as-needed basis. This created great confusion and difficulty in the field, which also resulted in a lack of morale (Close Air Support, 2014). The main difficulty in this lack of consistency was that each individual soldier in the field experienced a large amount of disconnection in terms of understanding and interpreting the ROE being handed down from superiors.
From the perspective of battalion commanders, the ROE was a little more complicated than simply being confused during field operations. They needed to interpret rules of engagement with an enemy that was far beyond what had been experienced thus far. It was, in fact, a new way of warfare. Hence, any learned military procedure was reduced to next to nothing as a result of the environment and types of warfare encountered (Close Air Support, 2014).
General William C. Westmoreland
The challenge faced by General William C. Westmoreland was that he was subject to binding rules of engagement from the president. The Marines were authorized to only protect the airbase. A further challenge he emerged from the Commander of the First Corps Tactical Zone, General Nguyen Chanh Thi, who distrusted the marines (Close Air Support, 2014).
On the other hand, Westmoreland was also significantly concerned with the Vietnamese and their sentiments. In other words, Westmoreland emphasized cooperation, which necessarily included a lack of operational control when it…
Chain command links uniformed service senior junior, junior ranks President United States. There great levels In some ways, the individual soldiers in the field have the greatest amount of responsibility in terms of understanding and actually actuating the rules of engagement (ROE) within the limited war ideology of Vietnam. The others in the chain of command are responsible for determining their actions, as well as the overall military action of the
Chain of Command In Vietnam, the rules of engagement were designed to limit the impact of operations in select areas (most notably: North Vietnam). This is because there were concerns that the conflict could escalate. If this were to happen, it was believed that the Soviet Union or China could be drawn into the war. To prevent this and destroy the North's ability to fight, the policy concentrated on: annihilating their
Introduction to the Incident Command System (ICS) The Incident Command System (ICS) is a standardized organization model or method for incident response and management during disasters. The system is made up of standard management and leadership hierarchy procedures, including processes meant to support various types of incidents. It does not just respect jurisdictional and agency authority, but also supports synchronized efforts among different disaster response and management teams and agencies. ICS
command system (ICS) as defined by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is 'a standardized, on-scene, all-hazards incident management approach' used by all governmental levels in any type of incident however complex. Features of an Incident command system ICS integrates a number of management features that add up to the efficiency and strength of the system as a whole. The incident commander creates needed sections and delegates operations to other personnel. Features
Chain of Command and ROE Levels of the Chain of Command The objective of this study is to discuss the views of the six levels in the chain of command from the perspective of each during the Vietnam War. The six levels of the chain of command includes: (1) the individual soldiers in the field; (2) battalion commanders; (3) division commanders; (4) General William Westmoreland; Secretary Of Defense Robert McNamara; and
U.S. Military Chain of Command The traditional wars that have followed the Europeans models developed by Napoleon basically incorporate the leadership in writing and training troops for rules of engagement. Rules of Engagement (ROE) is described as a management tool that help in keeping soldiers within control and aligned with the specific mission. This management tool has contributed to benefits and costs in which training ROE in each leadership level down