Code Of Hammurabi Hammurabi, The King Of Research Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
885
Cite

Code of Hammurabi Hammurabi, the king of Babylonia in the eighteenth century B.C., developed an extensive legal system that came to be known as the Code of Hammurabi. The code covered topics such as military service, family life, and commercial and criminal law ("Hammurabi" 1). The King stated that the laws had been given to him by the Sun God and the God of Justice, Shamash, for him to carry out. It was a series of legal decisions that he referred to as "verdicts of the just order" ("The Code" 506). The code was most often inscribed on 8-foot high stone slabs of black diorite and placed in public view to serve as an aid for any citizen in search of legal advice.

King Hammurabi ruled Babylonia for 43 years. Scholars estimate his reign to be between 1850 and 1750 B.C. ("Hammurabi" 1). He was noted as being an efficient king who carefully orchestrated order throughout his kingdom. In addition to standardizing legal matters, the Code of Hammurabi serves as testament to the ruler's impressive language skills. He reformed the Akadian language in which the code was written, providing a model for the future writers in Mesopotamia ("The Code" 506). In fact, the Code of Hammurabi was based on older collections of Sumerian and Akkadian laws, which Hammurabi modified and expanded.

The Code influenced all Near Eastern countries...

...

The most widely referenced subject matter included false accusation, witchcraft, land and business regulations, tariffs, wages, trade, loans and debts. Marriage and divorce were also covered as well as criminal actions like burglary, assault, kidnapping, and murder. The Code marked a change in thinking on several issues concerning sanctions.
Penalties for violations varied according to the status of the offenders and the circumstances of the offenses. For instance, a judge who blundered in a law case was to be expelled from his judgeship forever, and heavily fined. The witness who testified falsely was to be slain. If a man built a house poorly, and it fell and killed the owner, the builder was to be slain. If the owner's son was killed, then the builder's son is slain. Indeed, more serious crimes were punishable by death ("The Code" 506). It is thought that this became the Hebrews basis for the "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" philosophy of retribution found in the Bible (Farkas 159).

Interestingly, Hammurabi is never mentioned in the first edition of the Bible. Hammurabi is widely recognized to have been the dominant political power in his era -- a period that coincides somewhat with the lifespan of Abraham, who the Bible describes as having numerous diplomatic activities…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Farkas, David S. "In Search Of the Biblical Hammurabi." Jewish Bible Quarterly 39.3 (2011): 159-164. Academic Search Premier. Web. 4 Sept. 2012.

"Hammurabi." Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6Th Edition (2011): 1. Academic Search Premier. Web. 4 Sept. 2012.

"The Code of Hammurabi." Harvard Law Review 17.7 (1904): 506. Academic Search Premier. Web. 4 Sept. 2012.


Cite this Document:

"Code Of Hammurabi Hammurabi The King Of" (2012, September 04) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/code-of-hammurabi-hammurabi-the-king-of-81971

"Code Of Hammurabi Hammurabi The King Of" 04 September 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/code-of-hammurabi-hammurabi-the-king-of-81971>

"Code Of Hammurabi Hammurabi The King Of", 04 September 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/code-of-hammurabi-hammurabi-the-king-of-81971

Related Documents

One of the largest sections of Hammurabi's Code focuses on the family and the best ways that a family can protect and maintain itself. Another large section of the code deals with commerce and from this, the code looks into such issues as debt, interest, and default. What we learn from these sections is that the Babylonian society was one that was somewhat sophisticated and it attempted to deal with

Hammurabi Comparing the Code of Hammurabi with U.S. Law The Code of Hammurabi dates back to the second millennium BC (approximately 1772 BC). Consisting of 282 laws, Hammurabi's Code became the rule for ancient Babylonians, just like today's Americans look to the Constitution for their rule. Although separated by thousands of years, Hammurabi's Code and the laws of the United States actually have some similarities. They are also, of course, different in

Hammurabi's Code of Laws
PAGES 6 WORDS 2060

Hammurabi's Code Of Laws Hammurabi, King of Babylonia (from: 1795- 1750 BC ), was the greatest ruler of the Babylonian dynasty. During his reign, he extended his empire northward from the Persian Gulf through the Tigris and Euphrates river valleys (the present day Iraq) and westward to the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. Apart from his considerable achievements as a military leader and administrator, he is primarily remembered for his codification of

A rich accuser was more likely to escape with a fine when a poorer person committing the same crime could be put to death. Ownership was considered sacrosanct. Even if a person lost his property because he was part of a losing battle, on return his property would be restored, failing that, it would be restored to his progeny. Loss in battle in interestingly described in the literal translation as

Code of Hammurabi -- exodus A Comparison/contrast Between the codes of hammurabi & THE BOOK OF EXODUS Sometime in the early fourth millennium B.C.E. In Mesopotamia (currently Iran, Iraq and formerly Persia), a very critical event occurred which changed the face of civilization, namely the settlement of the great river valley bounded by the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. It was after this pivotal event that writing, art, architecture and new political forms were

Hammurabi A modern day reader of the Hammurabi Law Code would immediately be stricken by the one primary punishment offered in a majority of the laws as being death. One could perceive from that fact that the Hammurabi society was one where death was a frequent occurrence. Comparing that society and its fixation on death with today's modern society and its abhorrence of death (at least as a punishment) leads one