Court Martial Of Billy Mitchell. Research Proposal

" The position is on the Western Front, near Verdun in France, and it is a gripping look at the trench warfare tactics of the war. The French soldiers are clearly unready for an attack, but the crazy General makes them attack in spite of their worthiness, because of his own selfish needs and wants. Ultimately, it is no surprise that the attack fails, the men simply were not ready, and some of them will not even leave the trenches because they know it is hopeless. The General is enraged because of this, and he convinces his commander that he must discipline the men because of their "mutiny." He chooses three men to court-martial as an example to the other soldiers. The General is front and center in the courtroom, which ultimately threatens the judge, who finds the men guilty, even though they are defended with great skill by Colonel Dax, a commander in the regiment who understand just how crazy the General really is. Dax tries to get the judge to change his mind, but the men are shot for their crimes anyway. At the end, a jaded Dax turns down a promotion, but it seems that another man will accuse the General of ordering his men to fire on the men who refused to leave the trenches, so it seems as if justice may still be done to the General. Like the other video, this film is a look at military leadership and how it can become corrupt and ineffectual. The General is power hungry and perhaps even crazy, and he should not be leading men.

The film also shows the violence and insanity of war, and what trench warfare was like to a degree, showing the hardships the men had to face, the conditions, and the brutality of war and the battlefield. Some of the most memorable moments are not in the courtroom, but on the battlefield as the men attempt to take the "Ant Hill," knowing it is an impossible,...

...

It shows the military as inherently flawed, and there is little to make me think that has changed in modern history.
The film also shows that ordinary men can become extraordinary in the heat of battle and in the defense of their own. Dax is somewhat of a hero, just like Mitchell was, in his attempt to clear the men and save their lives, and he is heroic on the battlefield, as well. While the film shows the horror of war, it also celebrates the ordinary people that step up to do battle, and that really relates to modern history, as well. The same kind of people are fighting today in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they do not receive enough credit, either. The truth is, they could be fighting under similar conditions, with poor leadership, and again, that shows that we have not learned from history. We still send men to die in battle in foreign countries, we still promote leaders who are not really leaders at all, and we still fight wars and kill people for any number of reasons and objectives.

What is most memorable about this film are the battle scenes, which are realistic and frightening at the same time. The men faced up to the enemy, even when they knew they could not reach their objective, and it all seems so senseless. The men who tried to take the Ant Hill did not have to die. The attack was flawed, and most of the men went anyway, which shows they were brave and resilient even under shoddy leadership. Most of all, this film made me wonder how many men in how many wars have died for the same reason, and it made me think about war and the futility of war.

Cite this Document:

"Court Martial Of Billy Mitchell " (2009, January 20) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-martial-of-billy-mitchell-25378

"Court Martial Of Billy Mitchell " 20 January 2009. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-martial-of-billy-mitchell-25378>

"Court Martial Of Billy Mitchell ", 20 January 2009, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/court-martial-of-billy-mitchell-25378

Related Documents

Billy Mitchell and Airpower During the interwar period a number people advocated major changes in military doctrine and organizations, particularly in the use of airpower. Three important airpower advocates were Giulio Douhet, Hugh Trenchard, and Billy Mitchell, who all insisted that the air arm should be independent of the army and navy. Trenchard in fact was the commander of the first independent air force in the world, the Royal Air Force

He used his skills of persuasion to convince U.S. Commander-in-Chief Jack Pershing that his ideas for a U.S. Air Force deserved attention. Mitchell then personally trained and organized the first pilots of the newly created air force, earning him the title as its "father." In addition, during the St. Mihiel offensive in 1918, he led the largest air fleet of the time, consisting of nearly 1500 allied aircraft. Perhaps

Some of the best military leaders of the time ignored him, and that is a pretty sad statement about our country's military. Mitchell was a war hero, but he was a real hero too, because of the way he stood up to the military and made matters public. This film is based on the true story of Billy Mitchell, and it is well acted and very dramatic at times. I

William Mitchell William Over the years, different types of leadership styles have been continually examined to determine the best approaches for working with others and motivating everyone to do more. For future generations, these attributes help them to decide how and when to reach out to stakeholders. In the case William (Billy) Mitchell, he is the classic example of embracing these attributes. To fully understand which characteristics he exhibited requires examining his

Person in Aviation
PAGES 4 WORDS 1385

Aviation Brigadier General William "Billy" Mitchell Brigadier General William "Billy" Mitchell It may seem that aviation has a long and storied history because it seems now to have been a part of the national landscape forever. But, the reality is that the history of flying is very short even considering the many different types of vehicles that have been used. When it comes to actual powered airplanes, that history is even shorter, but