Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Crime
"Getting tough" on crime became a popular notion in 1970's America. Since that time, America has increasingly jailed/imprisoned offenders at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars. Though some people strongly believe in "getting tough," there are now serious questions about the cost effectiveness and wisdom of that harsh approach. Several experts believe that "getting tough" is not the answer and that a more scientific, comprehensive approach is needed to effectively deal with our high crime rate.
The "get tough" approach to crime is sometimes thought to mean a more severe approach to crime, including more arrests and more jail sentences (Barkan, 2011, p. 5.4). This approach has been a popular approach in America since the 1970's and the United States has increased its jail population to 5 times the jail population we had in the 1970's (Barkan, 2011, p. 5.4). With more than 2.3 million incarcerated people as of 2011, America has spent hundreds of billions of dollars on this "get tough" approach (Barkan, 2011, p. 5.4).
People who support this "get tough" approach believe that the United States must use it: to fight the alarming increase in crime by an approach that is effective because crime decreased when incarceration rose in the 1990's; and because government should be seen to be tough on crime (Barkan, 2011, p. 5.4). However, people who are against the "get tough" approach believe that: it is not cost-effective, because spending hundreds of billions of dollars...
5.4); after incarcerating these people, we release approximately 700,000 of them per year, creating many problems for the areas in which they are released and live (Barkan, 2011, p. 5.4); and several experts seem to agree that the nation's well-being and the offender's well-being are really 2 sides of the same coin, because dealing with the offender's problems will reduce crimes related to those problems without costing hundreds of billions of dollars.
The anti-"get tough" arguments appear to be more sensible. For example, the alcohol/substance abuse problem in the United States has a great impact on the Criminal Justice System: every day, the Criminal Justice System must deal with either alcohol/substance abuse charges or related problems such as thefts to obtain drug money, domestic abuse and probation violations by failed alcohol/drug tests (Dressel, 2011). Through decades of dealing with the problems of alcohol/substance abuse and seeing that these problems are not being solved by simply throwing people in jail for selling or using, Criminal Justice experts are increasingly acting on the belief that the well-being of the community and the well-being of the offender go hand-in-hand. By bringing together experts from several fields, the System is focusing on breaking the cycle of alcohol/substance…
Works Cited
Barkan, S.E. (2011). Sociology: Understanding and changing the social world, brief edition, v. 1.1. Retrieved on October 2, 2012 from flatworldknowledge.com Web site: http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/reader/4306?e=barkbrief-1.1-ch05_s04
Dressel, W.F. (2011, November 8). Creating institutional change in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved on October 2, 2012 from www.whitehouse.gov Web site: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/11/08/creating-institutional-change-criminal-justice-system
Philosophy Crime Punishment Shifted Social Context and the Justification of Punishment Punishment is an authoritative exercise aimed to impose a negative or unwanted response to a behavior considered wrong or unjust by an individual or group. Philosophies surrounding crime and their punishment have changed between centuries, and even decades, to reflect the societies in which they occur. The legal mandate of punishment enforces a source of pain or deprivation to place
When Gorbachev launched perestroika (Gorbachev's policy of social, economic and political restructuring), the above mentioned "shadow" sector of society actually got amnesty and hence were offered a kind of "legitimacy," Khokhriakov writes on page 13. During the first part of perestroika, the Soviets developed cooperatives, which "only strengthened the destructive model of the 'shadow' market economy, Khokhriakov explains on page 14. But the Soviets' transition was short of capital so
Preventing Crime Will Be More Effective Than Rehabilitation Pennsylvania Preventing Crime May Be More Effective Than Rehabilitation This paper reviews Pennsylvania policymakers approach to crime. In particular the researcher explores the idea that it is better to prevent crime than merely rehabilitate criminals. Once released, most criminals return to a life of crime. Recent research in Pennsylvania State however, reveals that crime may be prevented if rehabilitative measures begin at the juvenile level. If at-risk
Juvenile Justice Policy regarding juvenile crime and justice has moved to the center of public attention and political debate in recent years. Increases in youth crime, stories of frustrated parents seeking help for their troubled children, and criticisms of juvenile justice programs have led to demands for change in the way young offenders are charged, punished, and treated (Howell, Krisberg, & Jones, 1995). Public concern about violent juvenile crime is also
Evolution of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 Most Americans regard the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 as the most comprehensive and far-reaching anti-crime bill in the country's history. The Act, which took up more than 1000 pages and an approximate $30 billion in costs, covered an overwhelming array of areas ranging from funding for late-night youth basketball programs to a ban on
American Corrections System Prisons are so overcrowded within the states that typically "only one criminal is jailed for every one hundred violent crimes committed" (Economist, 1996). Many violent criminal offenders do not even serve out their entire terms; many serve half of their term and are released on an appeal or probation (Economist, 1996). These prisoners are often released to society only to commit another crime at a later date. Statistics validate