Apparantely in good health, need to investigate insurance and other issues, get medical report.
Married, one-4-year-old son
Appears happily married with young child, no indication of turmoil in marriage; check.
Colleagues say victim was "very organized," and kept to himself, did not make friends nor enemies
Mr. T. appears to be inoffensive, not prone to situations that would engender violence.
Profession: Attorney; normal office hours 8am-5pm; known to work late on cases as necessary
Q: What type of attorney? What are recent cases? Are any controversial or involving something or someone who has a vested interest in keeping information private.
Mr. T. was wearing black pants, a shirt and tie and a wedding ring. The clothing was intact; wallet appeared to be in order, no missing money or credit cards.
Suggests this was not a crime of passion (victim killed not brutalized and left intact); no money or credit cards taken, likely no motive of theft.
Mr. T. was found in the middle of the floor of his office, between the desk and the door.
Suggests that Mr. A was not at his desk when murder occurred, likely he heard someone approach and was investigating or startled.
Mr. T. was found with what initially appear to be stab wounds, 13 to the chest. No other wounds were found, and not defensive wounds noted
Does not appear Mr. T. had the chance to fight back; Q: was he drugged with ether or chloroform before murder? Why did he not resist? Wounds definitely not self inflicted.
Table 2 - Initial crime scenario -- location & physical details
Office is 3rd story, First National Bank Building, total 20 stories
3rd story approachable from street? Q -- What side of the building does window opent towards?
Office located adjacent to Medical Doctor's office
Check with MD personnel; usually their hours are longer than 8am-5pm, check to see if anyone heard or saw anything suspicious
Building cameras did not capture any unusual people leaving first floor of building
Despite this, best to review any person's activity coming onto the 3rd floor after 5pm; did anyone enter or leave the building between 5pm-7am?
The door to Mr. T.'s office was intact, no evidence of forcing or tampering.
Posit: Either perpetrator was known to Mr. T. And came in through the door, or did not use the door at all.
No murder weapon was found; e.g. no knife or other sharp object that could be linked to the scene.
Suggests intent to conceal weapon, leaving no fingerprints, etc.
Overall office is neat and tidy; there is a sofa and fish tank in the office (undamaged), modern art pieces on the walls; light is dim; unblemished photo of the Mr. T.'s wife and child on the desk.
With most of office left intact and neat and tidy, suggest that the perpetrator was focused on something in files or desk; not a safe or wall art. Again, points against motivation of theft.
Floor is carpeted (taupe color), bloodstains noticable; there is only one door leading out into the shared hallway.
Perpetrator would have had to leave the building one of two ways; door or window; camera check will narrow down door.
The file cabinet drawers are open; numerous office papers are strewn all over the floor.
Suggests that it was case information that was the target; Q: are there computer backups of data? Might Assistant...
The computer is on the floor (CPU, monitor, keyboard, mouse); the clock stopped at 630; ostentibly the cord was pulled when the computer was thrown on the floor.
Suggests cutting cord in the event of potential alarm; or to stop any uploads or downloads of data. Computer thrown on the floor: Q: was hard drive intact or taken? Zip or jump drives? Manual or automatic backup?
The one window in the office suite is open, there is only one window
Suggests entrance or egress from window. Tapes and counts of people before 630pm should verify.
No strange aromas (perfume, coffee, food, etc.) with the exception of the corpse exposed to direct light (from open window) for 12 hours.
Lack of perfume suggest not a woman (on the surface), also suggests that Mr. T. was not intending to stay late (no coffee or food smells apparent).
Table 3 - Initial crime scenario -- witnesses and ancillary details
Mr. T.'s assistant was out of town on vaction for 2-weeks.
Q: Find out and verify location of Assistant; also quiz Assistant as soon as possible regarding details of current cases.
Mr. T. had a late lunch with an old college friend; lunch began at 2pm.
Q: Verify colleague/friend, was Mr. T. working with this person on a case? Did Mr. T. have anything in files that was incriminating or controversial about this person. WHO WAS THIS PERSON?
Custodian left the building around 5pm; no one interviewed heard any signs of struggle or other sounds.
Suggests that any sign of struggle occurred after 5pm, and close to 630pm.
The Janitor, who arrives prior to 8am in the mornings, found the body.
Again, sets TOD prior to Janitor's arrival.
Table 4 - Initial crime scenario -- preliminary timeline
Mr. T. is working alone in his office, Assistant out of town. He breaks for lunch with an old friend.
Estimated lunch with colleage; need to verify timing with restaurant and/or credit card receipts.
Mr. T. returns to office; check cameras to see if he returned alone.
Office is quiet, no one hears or notices anything out of the ordinary
Janitor leaves the building
Janitor arrives, finds body, phones police
Police arrive and secure the scene
Helfgott, J. (2008). Criminal Behavior: Theories, Typologies, and Criminal Justice. Thosand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Houck and Siegel. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic Science. Elsiver.
Koblinsky, L., et.al. (2004). DNA: Forensic and Legal Applications. Wiley-Interscience.
Myers, D. (2004). Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
Quinche and Margot. (2010). A Precursor in the history of Fingermark Detection and their Potential Uses. Journal of Forensic Identification, 60(2), 129-134.
Tues. 630pm- Wed. 730am
Use phone and camera records to find out Mr. T.'s exact time of arrival at office
Where was the 2pm lunch? Get name of colleague.
Verify return to office, if alone, phone or appointment records..
630 PM Likely TOD
Office of Tort, PC
File Cabinet & Strewn Files
Doors into Offices
Window to Outside
Window to Outside
Mr. T.'s desk and computer station…
In other words, there is a preoccupation with repeat offenders and the first time offenders seem to get less severe penalties. As crime levels continue to rise although the media tends to report the opposite, citizens seem more dedicated to getting even first time offenders off of the streets. References Carlsmith, Kevin J., Darley, John M., & Robinson, Paul H. (2002). Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives
Crime Scene Analysis The case study presents a homicide incident, which occurred at 9170 Old Annapolis Road Columbia. The victim was Ashley Nicole Smith, and the investigations identified two suspects who were Scott Jory Jones, and Frederick James Johnson. This case involves a series of events in the efforts to bring the involved into justice. This case study presents an actual case, but the case study does not use the actual
" Giannelli (2003) stresses that advantages and reliability of scientific and technical evidence depend on whether a scientific culture exists. For reliability of DNA and other scientific evidence, there have to be sufficient written protocols and "an empirical basis for the most basic procedures." (Giannelli, 2003) Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer (cited by Giannelli, 2003) conclude that their investigations revealed that a third of the criminal convictions of 62
In fact, and quite surprisingly, one of the key findings of the Rand Report was that 50% of the nation's detectives could be eliminated without having a significant effect on clearance rates in the country (O'Connor). This conclusion flies in the face of conventional wisdom on police work, yet was fully supported by the exhaustive study. The study was funded by the National Institute of Justice and was designed
The second is the methods of work that must follow a quality certified system. Overall System Design Since the work relates to scientific study, a scientific temperament and better equipped laboratory is a must. For each section of the system dealing with major and minor investigations, appropriate equipments, modern electronic gadgets and data processing systems must be provided and they must also be upgraded frequently. The personnel must be trained in
Hair is also in contact with chemicals in shampoos, and any dyes, gels, sprays or other cosmetics that may be placed on the hair (11). Since there is no standardized method for cleaning these external contaminants off of the hair prior to analysis, the potential for inaccurate results from external contamination is widespread. There is no way to tell in the laboratory if a chemical is contained within the hair,