Criminal Justice System Normally Refers To The Essay

Criminal justice system normally refers to the compilation of the prevailing federal; state accompanied by the local public agencies those pacts with the crime problem. These corresponding agencies procedure suspects, defendants accompanied by the convicted offenders and are normally mutually dependent insofar as the prevailing decisions of the single agency influence other supplementary agencies (Cole & Smith, 2009). The fundamental framework of the underlying system is normally granted through the lawmaking, judicial and the executive twigs of the government. The major significant advancements within the criminal justice system within the past decade has been the widespread execution of the corresponding initiatives designed that pertain to the diverting of the populace with mental sickness accompanied by the addictions away from the prevailing imprisonment and their treatments (David, 2008). The development of the existing jail distraction programs, mental health courts and drug courts has been promoted through the belief that these prevailing programs addresses a pressing policy issue and subsequently save money. The underlying programs claim to have resulted to the production of the significant reduction within the recidivism accompanied by its economical value that pertains to saving lots of money during its process of implementation. The approximation of the cost savings to the underlying justice system particularly the corresponding jails ranges from hundreds of thousands dollars to millions of dollars. Hitherto transversely the country, sheriffs have managed to execute the programs in perpetual in order to realize suitable jail budgets in long-lasting to develop (Cole & Smith, 2009). A court is normally considered as the law enforcement that is the initial stage of the corresponding criminal justice procedures. The populaces who are normally arrested are prosecuted in order to decide whether to either prosecute or drop the prevailing case accompanied by the judges decides the terms of the bail (David, 2008). In case the prosecution process take place then the prevailing prosecutor ought to make a decision on the charges. The underlying defendant ought to select to either importune guilty or not culpable, juries are normally selected and thus in case the culpable, and the prevailing judge ought to make decision on the appropriate penalty. There exist three levels of courts namely the trial courts of the limited jurisdiction, general jurisdiction and the appellate courts....

...

It could be called magistrate court, civic court, police force court, district justice court, petite claims court accompanied by the city court (David, 2008). The next level in the system of the courts is normally general jurisdiction that is also known with diverse names such as circuit court, higher court, accompanied by the court of universal sessions, district court, and the court of ordinary pleas. The prevailing twenty three states possess intermediate appellate courts that ought to be called as Supreme Court, courtyard of appeals, and the corresponding appellate separation of Supreme Court. The final level within the court system is normally Supreme Court which is considered as the last resort.Moreover, the lowest level courtyard normally deals with minor cases, while the subsequent level possess authority over the entire felony cases. The corresponding Federal courts normally operates in ensuring enforcement of the prevailing federal law accompanied by the trying of the constitutionality of central and country legislation, and lower court judgments (Cole & Smith, 2009).
The corrections within the criminal system refers to the prevailing system of the probation, jails, parole accompanied by the prisons (David, 2008). Within the existing America justice system, crime problem is reflected as a conservative model that is charged with the responsibility of emphasizing on the building of the addition prisons accompanied obligatory sentencing. The prevailing policies and the corresponding rhetoric normally possess often and promise to eradicate taxes. The correction system is normally charged with rehabilitation model that was replaced penology (David, 2008).

Police is also the fundamental system of the criminal justice that is normally formalization of the policing that has risen from the corresponding urbanization and industrialization within the Western world (Cole & Smith, 2009). The system is mainly composed of the selected constables accompanied by the sheriffs that are established to enforce laws. The police positions are frequently attained through the scheduled time by the political bosses (David, 2008). The diversity of the existing law enforcement agencies is normally contrasted to most of the prevailing which much of the larger federal control that pertains to policing. The…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

May, D.C. (2008). Corrections and the criminal justice system. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Pub.

Cole, George F., & Smith, Christopher. (2009). The American System of Criminal Justice.

Gardners Books.

Dantzker, M.L. (2009). Police organization and management: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.


Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice System Normally Refers To The" (2012, September 23) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-system-normally-refers-82219

"Criminal Justice System Normally Refers To The" 23 September 2012. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-system-normally-refers-82219>

"Criminal Justice System Normally Refers To The", 23 September 2012, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-system-normally-refers-82219

Related Documents

In the experimental community, the researchers instituted a media campaign to increase seat-belt usage, followed by increased police enforcement of the seat-belt law. It was found that the percentage of drivers using seat belts increased in the experimental community but remained stable or declined slightly in the comparison community (Piquero and Piquero, 2002). An example of the before-and-after design would be the analysis of the impact of the Massachusetts Bartley-Fox

This combination has brought about greater political support for crime victims' rights legislation and increased funding for crime victim services (Victimology Theory, 2003) There are many important questions that need to be looked at when studying victims of crime. Some of these questions include: Why was a particular person targeted for a crime? How were they targeted, or were they a victim of opportunity? What are the chances of that person becoming a

Criminal Justice The role of a judge includes interpretation and enforcement of the law. The judiciary is responsible for upholding and applying laws as made by the legislature. Such laws require interpretation and application by the judicial rules to diverse cases. The concept is inclusive of guidelines that promote appropriate sentencing (Gibson & Cavadino, 2008). Where the jury finds defendants guilty, the judges decide on appropriate sentencing. Magistrates find defendants guilty

However, as criminals become more aware of undercover tactics, the covert officer is required to provide more and more proof that he is indeed a criminal- which leads to the officer committing acts that compromise his or her integrity for the sake of maintaining cover. By understanding the often conflicting nature of these goals, deception and integrity, we can see how an undercover officer can become confused, lost, and

Baker reviewed three landmark Supreme Court decisions on capital punishment and concluded that the death penalty is capriciously imposed on Black defendants and thus serves the extra-legal function of preserving majority group interests. He viewed discrimination in capital sentencing as deliberate and identified the primary reasons why Black defendants with white victims have been denied fairness in capital sentencing. These are prosecutorial discretion in the selective prosecution of capital

The problem of determining the right approach is compounded by the effects of the culture of violence to which many young offenders are exposed. In some cases, it is possible to reform their behavior but in other cases, juvenile offenders already take on the hardened attitude normally associated with adult offenders. As a result, some juveniles are too far gone to reach through non-punitive methods by the time they reach