Criminology M3D1: Crime Trends And Discussion Chapter

PAGES
2
WORDS
897
Cite
Related Topics:

The high level of homicide in Chicago is a result of lack of social control. Population heterogeneity also contributes to the high level of homicide in the neighbourhoods (Rafter 1990). The two theories complement each other in that they both support the idea behind the high levels of homicide in Chicago. Social disorder brings disunity in society, and this makes people commit criminal behaviours. Social learning theory states that people will develop the motivation to commit crime if they associate with people who commit crime. Social control will enable people to practise social order and help them from associating with criminals who might influence them negatively. It is crucial for people to have self-control in order for them to refrain from committing criminal behaviours. Factors such as lack of self-control make people engage in criminal behaviour to achieve institutional goals. These institutional goals include earning money and making a good life for them and their families. Sampton, Raundenbush, and Earls state that factors such as race ca make people engage in criminal behaviours. Race is a sensitive issue that makes the discriminated race to take actions that will make them succeed in the contemporary society. Racial discrimination makes capable people not able to provide for themselves and their families.

Another version would be that the high level of homicide in Chicago compared to collective...

...

Poor economic conditions and residential instability hinder community cohesion (Maxfield, 1999). This happens because social networks in the community weaken and people decline to exercise social control. This explains the high level of homicide because neighbourhoods in Chicago have no cohesion.
These two theories complement each other. The two theories agree that the reason behind the high level of homicide in Chicago is a social disorder. This makes people commit crimes such as homicides. The two theories also agree that social control is a necessity that people should embrace to bring cohesion. This will lower level of homicide in Chicago and raise the level of collective efficacy. The two theories show how much people will do to ensure that they have a means of getting income. Money is important and people will always do everything to ensure that they get it. Some people d not follow the institutional means of achieving success they use crime as a shortcut to get it. This increases the level of crime in society.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Maxfield, Michael G. (1999). The National Incident-Based Reporting System: Research and Policy Applications. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15, 119-149.

Rafter, Nicole Hahn. (1990). The Social Construction of Crime and Crime Control. Journal on Research in Crime and Delinquency 27: 376-389.


Cite this Document:

"Criminology M3D1 Crime Trends And" (2013, March 16) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminology-m3d1-crime-trends-and-86743

"Criminology M3D1 Crime Trends And" 16 March 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminology-m3d1-crime-trends-and-86743>

"Criminology M3D1 Crime Trends And", 16 March 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminology-m3d1-crime-trends-and-86743

Related Documents

Criminology What was the "rational choice theory" of crime causation? The "rational choice theory" of crime causation holds that crime is consciously committed out of an intellectual desire to improve one's situation. Accordingly, the theory does not believe that delinquents are motivated through unconscious urges, but instead contends that people are goal-oriented. Another implication of the theory is that everyone, regardless of their neurological profile, has the ability to act in a

This is a form of punishment that is incremental in application, and establishes what the public perceives as unbreakable pattern of individual criminal recidivism (Siegel, p. 110). However, there is no evidence to support incarceration itself as a deterrent to crime (pp. 110-111). Many criminologists disagree with public opinion on the topic of three strikes incarceration (p. 110), which is, in brief, when a person commits a felony, that

All students would be responsible for monitoring the halls at all times and for telling their fellow students when they were violating one of the rules. To give them an incentive to engage in such monitoring, students would be responsible for certain duties, such as picking up litter, removing graffiti, and straightening the lunchroom when students violated school rules. A violation of the rules of the school would be

Though the Positivist thinking does not contradict the beliefs toward human nature, it does argue that the majority of crimes that are of a serious degree are attributed to people whom have failed to the civilized norms of modern society (PSC, 2004). In sum, the beliefs that invoked by criminal behavior have differed throughout time as much as the varying degree of crimes that we have seen through history. Sociologically

Criminology Theories Biological Theory of Crime The biological or bio-physiological theory of crime regards human behavior in general and of deviance and criminality in particular as mainly the result of internal states of mind (Schmalleger, 2009). More specifically, the biological perspective, as it was originally detailed in the 19th century by Cesare Lombroso, emphasized the role of heredity in conjunction with the (then) new concept of Darwinian Evolution also in conjunction with

That is, in understanding an issue or phenomenon, it is vital for the observer or the sociologist to put it into context in order to create the right "picture" of what is happening. For example, the structural functionalist perspective of criminology posits that crime occurs because of deviant behavior, and that deviance is but an inevitable part of the society. From this perspective, crime is the counterpart of society's