¶ … Darwinists Must Be Crazy
Imagine the possibilities of learning about Charles Darwin, and studying many forms that exist, such as social, economic and political. However, does this apply to every situation based off his theory? Is survival of the fittest applicable in statistics? How about natural selection? One will investigate further the theory of evolution by discussing probability and many other factors involved.
Every person who believes in evolution thinks that the earth is four billion years old sometimes more or less depending on his or her viewpoint. In order for anything to appear true, species and the origin of everything has to go from simple to complex organisms. Charles Darwin mentions that all life came out of former existence (Darwin, 2003). Is this really true, though?
Instead of using five billion years, let us use 13 billion instead. One can assume that all of these days were good. Furthermore, one needs to discuss statistics to see how this may or may not work with the concepts of evolution (Darwin, 2003). What are the actual chances that if somone tosses a coin, he or she will get heads? This is usually 1/2 or 50%. In regards to a die, a person has a 1/6 possibility. Now if one combines the coin and the die, the probability is a 1/12 likelihood. Additionally, when an individual throws either, this does not mean that a head will always occur and a six with the die. This does mean that if anyone throws for a certain period of time, that both of these possiblities will occur (Nielsen, 2005).
Now one can make...
In biology, a warm pond is where amino acids and that they were all of what is needed to make life. Each of them replicate as if they were Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). Through this, the goal is to get them in the right sequence, and if any of them are not, then it will not work. In reality, not one person can manipulate it through natural selection or any other method in which to make it work correctly (Nielsen, 2005). The odds of making this actually happen is 1 x 1064,489. Furthermore, life is complex. For example, a human DNA has at least three billion acids and basis embedded in it. One is not counting the proteins, enzymes and so forth. This demonstrates that odds are impossible, and that evolution is not the source of how life began (Nielsen, 2005).
Fred Hoyle stated this: "Two thousand different and very complex enzymes are required for a living organism to exist. And random shuffling processes could not form a single one of these even in 20 billion years" (Hoyle, 1997). This indicates that the chances of evolution occurring is improbable. For one organism to get formed from a complex entity is not possible. Charles Darwin wanted this to happen but statistics says otherwise.
Natural selection does not apply to statistics. Charles Darwin claims that each animal will adapt to his or her community; however, he further notes that "what natural selection cannot do, is to modify the structure of one species, without giving it any advantage, for the good of another species" (Darwin, 2003). He goes on to say that nothing is found in…
